An artist's depiction of an Extended Unit Death
So eager to let me decide to kill someone, even after what happened after last time? The only players who would be confident enough to let me just do that are the ones who know that I didn't constrain anyone from their team.
Are you actually suggesting that you are not going to kill a single person? Rogue Engineer is the Town's only killing role. You make an educated guess, constrain someone, and then execute them during the day to prove your role. How hard is that?
No, that is not what I'm suggesting.
Though now that you mention it, it would be way smarter to not kill anyone until the Theoretical Physicist can use his ability, so we could undo the mistakes and keep the victories, assuming the town is satisfied with evidence of absence to prove my role.
After the first person dies, you can start constraining people and keeping them alive to keep them in line, but it makes no sense to not verify your role when you have the easiest role to verify and you can also not be killed.
Did you see the rest of my post, or are you just intentionally skewing this statement?
I like how it took you guys almost a full day to make this suggestion; is your role-call a little slow?
Excuse me? I stated in the shoutbox
at least once that this is what you should do. I expected that you would have already known as much. I didn't think I needed to give you a play-by-play on the best course of action to take to ensure the Town's victory.
If you were serious about it, it doesn't belong in the shoutbox; this tells me you were concerned with who I might choose.
Edit:
Random killings are the only way to win, weren't you the one who pointed that out before? Now you are backing out of that statement in being afraid to kill someone?
Not random killings, no. It should be an informed decision based on your own behavioral analysis.
The Rogue Engineer should not claim. If the Rogue Engineer claims, then mafia knows who he is, and Roy made a valiant sacrifice. If someone was constrained, they should speak up, but probably won't. If mafia was constrained, they won't speak up. If someone was constrained, then the real Rogue Engineer should just kill them. If Rogue Engineer kills whoever they constrained, then we know Roy is fake and mafia still don't know who the real Rogue Engineer is.
The victim not speaking up would be a dumb move, just like the mafia fake-claiming as a victim would be a dumb move.
You base your lynch on Aristocrat off of nothing. I'll admit we don't have much, but we do know who voted for who in the mayor election. A logical selection of lynching would be DevliN, or even Wing Zero, as they had the next highest followings after you. DevliN claims he is a veteran who was hit, but logically, what mafia would try to kill DevliN? He would obviously be a good selection for lynching as he had a large following in the mayor election, so why would mafia waste a hit? But this could also be meaningless as most mafia hits are just randomly selected.
I'm basing it on nothing
that I have stated because I want some reactions first; I'm not here to spoonfeed you, and if I'm making a decision you don't agree with, you should be outspoken about it, like you and Azrael are. The players that concern me the most are the sheep.
And Roy, stop being so secretive, you are suppose to be a hub. If you didn't get a constrain in, at least tell us who you attempted to constrain.
You.
Post has been edited 1 time(s), last time on Sep 15 2012, 6:19 pm by Roy.