How many of you actually have sisters?

I have two, and a brother. ;o
Why?

4 here, worse luck. And I voted no, under any circumstances, because it's morally wrong. Using morals derived from the Bible of course

Since when did you people believe in the bible?

The amount of anything you manage to get away with is right. Right?
Think about that one for a sec.

Do want.

Like I said in the shout box. It was once said "If it's pretty it isn't gay(/wrong)" Which covers incest, traps, and bestiality. Not saying I do any of those but should a day arise when i see something so beautiful i shed a couple of man tears before embracing said sister/brother, trap, or animal then i always have my "as long as it's pretty philosophy.

I mean how many people find animals pretty? Understand?

If it goes to child birth then I demand that if the child would have a lower quality life because of some sort of chromosome mix up then Abortion should be applied. I also support abortion and stem cell research.

Poison's picture is an isolated case. Propaganda even! Open mindedness is close to Godlyness (or something idk)

Post has been edited 1 time(s), last time on Mar 22 2010, 11:26 am by MadZombie.

I did what JCobb suggested and imagined my friends fucking their sisters.
Funnily I discovered that I'd be amazed when he fucked his hot sister but I'd be disgusted when my other friend fucked his ugly sister.
I'm so immoral...

My view on this is that, if you really love your cousin/sister... and she really loves you, then you two should be together.. HOWEVER, you must also take responsibility for what you two could create.. Since you know full well of the consequences, both of you should not indulge in sex.

Srsly... we're being really srs for something that can be easily joked about ...

... Another reason why incest is bad... is wtf is your children going to call your parents or your cousins? And what about your grandchildren? Grandma = Aunty... lol...

The rate of birth defects in an F1 generation of healthy siblings is the same above the normal population as women over age 40 having a child, so I don't really care for ethical reasons.

Though I think in order to better advance ourselves physically (and cut the shit out of racism), people should be breeding with those that look the LEAST like them. Eskimos with Kenyans, Australians with Portugese, Dutch and Korean, etc.

As long as I get an asian we can roll with your plan Syphon.

Well it's definitely less amoral than a father fucking his daughter, which is more common.

Hawt.

I have one but she is so ugly I usually have to cover my eyes when speaking to her.

We'll be the judge of that.

give us something to judge

I'd find it weird, but I don't know if I would consider it wrong. It being ethically and morally wrong is just ingrained into my thinking due to television and peers though. No kids, I guess it'd be okay, but I like genetic diversity though, but I'm not really the judge of that.

For at least two hundred and fifty years, many men in the Roman province of Egypt married their full sisters and raised families with them. During the same era, Roman law firmly banned close-kin marriages and denounced them both as nefas, or sacrilegious, and against the ius gentium, the laws shared by all civilized peoples. In Egypt, however, Roman officials deliberately chose not to enforce the relevant marriage laws among the Greek metic, hybrid, and native Egyptian populations; the bureaucracy also created loopholes within new laws which tolerated the practice. This policy created a gap between the absolute theoretical ban in Roman law and the reality of common incestuous unions in Egypt. Since Roman Egypt was both an important and a dangerous province, Rome needed both to pacify its people and to weaken Egypt’s status with its neighbors. By permitting incestuous marriages among non-Romans in Egypt, the Roman governors simultaneously pleased the local population while causing Jews and North Africans to hold their neighbor in contempt.

Source: "Incest Laws and Absent Taboos in Roman Egypt" (A book)

Also, I forgot where I saw that since it was a long time ago but some king and queens used to marry between cousins in order to keep royalty in their family.

Edit:

When you say morally what does it mean? What is the fundamental of society? Is it only to have pleasure?
Having sex is not an end by itself. The point of libido is to produce children. Without it, men and women would not be attracted by each others.

Post has been edited 2 time(s), last time on Mar 22 2010, 11:09 pm by apos. Reason: Forgot a word that made it contradictory

LESS AMORAL?
Double negative = "More Correct"
So you're either mistakenly double negative'ing or you think that pedophilia > incest morally.

I have two sisters.

From what I've gathered, incest isn't really wrong (in moderation), it's just a taboo left over from previous era? (eras .. era ?)


Same


Rofl you would poison. Btw it wasn't an edit, that's how I wrote the post. Really just shorthand for "Sex isn't marriage."

I support incest 100%, which is funny because I'm an only child. Wish I had a sister, =/

Acceptable as long as the couple uses means of stopping childbirth

Depends on what you believe in, but there are cases where it's definitely alright. (Even if society says otherwise.)