The Puzzling 2
Jul 15 2008, 10:48 pm
By: payne  

Jul 15 2008, 10:48 pm payne Post #1

:payne:

Well, some weeks ago, when WoodenFire restarted to play a bit on Starcraft, I've heard him talking to someone about a "The Puzzling 2"...
Anyone know anything about this? :O
The Puzzling 1 was pretty damn interesting!!



None.

Jul 15 2008, 11:01 pm Moose Post #2

We live in a society.

I have The Puzzling 1. I have not heard of such a sequel.




Jul 16 2008, 12:54 am Roy Post #3

An artist's depiction of an Extended Unit Death

I've known of a few people trying to make The Puzzling 2. Everyone I've known stopped after the first puzzle or two and gave up, though. There was a map similar to The Puzzling (the name currently eludes me) but that isn't as popular now because one of the puzzles halfway through isn't possible (something to do with Blizzard's patch on stacking zerg units in-game).

Anyhow, shouldn't this topic be closed, or at least moved? :P




Jul 16 2008, 4:27 am FoxWolf1 Post #4



I'd be interested in a new puzzle map under a few conditions:
1. More focus on thought, less on precise motion. The first Puzzling was far too much about getting everyone on your team to move their stuff at the right time rather than figuring out what the right time was.
2. Lots of randomization, so that it's about figuring out how to solve the puzzles rather than simply memorizing the solution. Puzzles would still work in rule-driven ways, but what those rules would be for a given puzzle, and what spaces on the board are related to what actions, would both be randomized.
3. Limited tries per puzzle. This would only work in combination with point #1; it'd have to be fairly straightforward to implement a solution once one is discovered, or else people will use up their lives despite knowing what to do. The idea behind this point is to prevent the way I see many puzzles in the first Puzzling getting solved: trial and error.



None.

Jul 16 2008, 2:27 pm Falkoner Post #5



Quote
3. Limited tries per puzzle. This would only work in combination with point #1; it'd have to be fairly straightforward to implement a solution once one is discovered, or else people will use up their lives despite knowing what to do. The idea behind this point is to prevent the way I see many puzzles in the first Puzzling getting solved: trial and error.

I donno about this one, it's SC, it takes about 10 seconds to RM, so having limited tries is just more annoyance.



None.

Jul 16 2008, 6:27 pm FoxWolf1 Post #6



Quote from Falkoner
Quote
3. Limited tries per puzzle. This would only work in combination with point #1; it'd have to be fairly straightforward to implement a solution once one is discovered, or else people will use up their lives despite knowing what to do. The idea behind this point is to prevent the way I see many puzzles in the first Puzzling getting solved: trial and error.

I donno about this one, it's SC, it takes about 10 seconds to RM, so having limited tries is just more annoyance.

Yeah, but it would re-randomize them when you RM'd, so you'd be back to square one with regards to figuring out the puzzle.



None.

Jul 16 2008, 7:39 pm Ultraviolet Post #7



Quote from FoxWolf1
Quote from Falkoner
Quote
3. Limited tries per puzzle. This would only work in combination with point #1; it'd have to be fairly straightforward to implement a solution once one is discovered, or else people will use up their lives despite knowing what to do. The idea behind this point is to prevent the way I see many puzzles in the first Puzzling getting solved: trial and error.

I donno about this one, it's SC, it takes about 10 seconds to RM, so having limited tries is just more annoyance.

Yeah, but it would re-randomize them when you RM'd, so you'd be back to square one with regards to figuring out the puzzle.

If it worked based on the same mechanics then you could still get a general idea of how to beat it.




Jul 18 2008, 8:34 pm Madroc Post #8



Could I get a link to Puzzling 1?



None.

Jul 19 2008, 4:30 pm payne Post #9

:payne:

There ya go: http://www.staredit.net/files/584/
Btw, Fox, these are good recommendations for the maker of v2 :P



None.

Options
  Back to forum
Please log in to reply to this topic or to report it.
Members in this topic: None.
[01:53 am]
Ultraviolet -- :lol:
[06:51 pm]
Vrael -- It is, and I could definitely use a company with a commitment to flexibility, quality, and customer satisfaction to provide effective solutions to dampness and humidity in my urban environment.
[06:50 pm]
NudeRaider -- Vrael
Vrael shouted: Idk, I was looking more for a dehumidifer company which maybe stands out as a beacon of relief amidst damp and unpredictable climates of bustling metropolises. Not sure Amazon qualifies
sounds like moisture control is often a pressing concern in your city
[06:50 pm]
Vrael -- Maybe here on the StarEdit Network I could look through the Forums for some Introductions to people who care about the Topics of Dehumidifiers and Carpet Cleaning?
[06:49 pm]
Vrael -- Perhaps even here I on the StarEdit Network I could look for some Introductions.
[06:48 pm]
Vrael -- On this Topic, I could definitely use some Introductions.
[06:48 pm]
Vrael -- Perhaps that utilizes cutting-edge technology and eco-friendly cleaning products?
[06:47 pm]
Vrael -- Do you know anyone with a deep understanding of the unique characteristics of your carpets, ensuring they receive the specialized care they deserve?
[06:45 pm]
NudeRaider -- Vrael
Vrael shouted: I've also recently becoming interested in Carpet Cleaning, but I'd like to find someone with a reputation for unparalleled quality and attention to detail.
beats me, but I'd make sure to pick the epitome of excellence and nothing less.
[06:41 pm]
Vrael -- It seems like I may need Introductions to multiple companies for the Topics that I care deeply about, even as early as Today, 6:03 am.
Please log in to shout.


Members Online: Roy, IlyaSnopchenko