Why would he automatically want TiKels dead? TiKels rarely affects the game at all. Demon at least can crybaby his way to a favorable lynch if he tries hard enough, so I suppose that makes sense. And I vaguely remember a third person last game, and two sets aren't the same if one contains two numbers and one contains three, but what do I know?

I don't know why, but every game he and TiKels have played he's tried, and often succeeded, to kill TiKels.

I vote for Aristocrat. I'm not going to give up like every person whenever they're up for lynching like in the last game. If you guys want to lose your only killing power and once again allow Aristocrat to single-handedly ruin the town's chances of winning, go ahead and vote for me.

Except I'm the Vigilante, so the town wouldn't lose any killing power whatsoever.

Evidence please.

Preferably in the form of a subtitled video.

I also define "town" as being a town-aligned role. I'm saying that if one of them is the Vigilante, and the other is a non-Vigilante town aligned role, it wouldn't make sense for the non-Vigilante town-aligned role to claim Vig.

I vote No Lynch for now.

Post has been edited 1 time(s), last time on Nov 29 2012, 2:47 am by rayNimagi.

I vote NO LYNCH.

i vote no linch

linch spelled wrong
second letter = i
second letter in vigilante = i

lil confirmed for vigilante.

Roy did you vote?

No evidence either way, really.. Sigh. This is going to be a "fun" game.
No Lynch

The numbers are Devlin's bar code's (avatar).

Someone other than the Vigilante claimed Vigilante. No sane townie would do this. What more proof do you need? Holy shit.

Two competing claims for Vigilante: Aristocrat and Demon.

Case 1: Demon is Mafia
Then Aristocrat is most likely Vigilante.

Case 2: Demon is the Vigilante
Then Aristocrat is most likely Mafia.

Case 3: Demon is not Vigilante, but he is a town-aligned role.
Then Dem0n is a poor player.

Conclusion: If Demon dies, we learn something no matter what role he is.

I vote for Dem0n.

Just a passing note: it's funny how three consecutive posts switch the vote from a player to no lynch. Make of it what you will.

It does make sense, because I am a townie and am working together with other townies to save each other and defeat the Mafia.

Proposed policy:
If at any point in time, somebody claims to be mafia, assume that they are indeed mafia and lynch/incapacitate them. Claiming mafia does nothing for the town and the only reason why someone would do this would be to disorient and confuse the town intentionally.

Where's case 4?

Case 4: Aristocrat is not Vigilante, but he is a town-aligned role.
Then Aristocrat is a poor player.

Why do you automatically exclude that possibility? What has Aristocrat ever done in any game to make his word more trustworthy than mine?

I received a PM from Demon asking me to not vote for him. While I was considering his argument, I switched my vote to No Lynch. Then I decided that it would be in the town's best interest (for reasons stated above) to lynch Demon.

Sorry, Demon, nothing personal. I don't exactly trust Aristocrat either, but this way we get some information about him.