Quote from name:Azrael.Wrath
Also, please post the download link when you're finished.
Regardless, in the Western hemisphere at least nothing of this sort exists and probably never will (that will gain a user base)
When did I ever mention that I was going to make it? Last time I checked this wasn't an ideal hypothetical world. Maybe some hint of ideality exists in the community from which OP came from, however.
Quote from name:Azrael.Wrath
It can do all that, but I doubt anyone will care, it just needs to be able to process EUD actions. A launcher which does not allow for EUD actions is inferior to a launcher that does.
I have yet to see a scrap of logic provided that explains how a launcher which doesn't allow for EUD actions would be better than an identical launcher which does. You might say it's the same difference and not worth the trouble, but I have a folder full of maps which utilize EUD actions that begs to differ.
Next person who reads this post, please kindly reply, without fail, which you think is more easier to make, if you're trying to set a unit's HP to 100.
Player(1)
Always()
SetDeaths(Player 19027, Marine, SetTo, 100)
Player(1)
Always()
SetUnitHP(Index 0,100)
Based on that reply, that gives reason to care.
Also, when did I mention that a launcher couldn't run the extensions I was talking about and the EUD action plugin at the same time?
Quote from name:Azrael.Wrath
The bottom line is this. This topic is about how EUD actions will change everything. This "let's talk about how a theoretical launcher that no one plans to make which cannot utilize EUD actions might be somehow better" discussion is totally pointless, nonconstructive, illogical, off-topic, and disrespectful to the thread creator.
What makes EUD actions better? If I say using EUD actions is totally pointless, nonconstructive, illogical does that make me right? By the way OP even hinted towards extensions outside of EUD actions. I guess that's some points for me in terms of on-topicness?
The only thing you've said towards EUD actions is of existing maps, tools, and user/developer base.
Otherwise what I've mentioned is superior in any way,shape,or form. If nobody's going to implement it, fine. Chances are nobody's gonna implement anything you say that's new either.
Let it serve as what we should aim for in terms of future development, pretending that people still care.Quote from name:Azrael.Wrath
On topic, I would fully support a program similar to wLauncher in functionality for English servers. There is certainly some demand to be able to use EUD actions again in a public environment, so having something which makes it possible to do that would be great.
In English servers, no. Battle.net (and other places) is dead in terms of intelligence.
Bring on more blind persistence please. religiondebate gogo
Post has been edited 5 time(s), last time on Nov 21 2011, 7:48 am by yoonkwun.
None.