Quote
Public trackers:
-Widely used and open, high user count
-Widely used and open, high user count
Quote
-Can be used as long as you have a BT client, anonymous download
Quote
-infected/corrupt files easily detected by reading comments
Quote
-Resilient existence, not trivial to shut down by law enforcement
Quote
-Popular venue to distribute content
Quote
-Simple to create a new torrent
Quote
Private trackers:
-Invite-only or requiring registration, sometimes "sold" via a mandatory donation
-Invite-only or requiring registration, sometimes "sold" via a mandatory donation
Quote
-Client blocking (Not reasonable client bans like BitThief, but rather blockage of clients that the administration simply doesn't like such as Azureus)
Quote
-Strictly enforced UL/DL ratio quotas that lock you out
Quote
-Negligible download speed advantage
Quote
-Requires a shitton of port forwarding for you to get uploading credit (and you will get autobanned if you forget to do this)
Quote
-"Donator" advantages that equate to "buying" data
Quote
-Shitty sadistic administration that can get you blacklisted from all of its affiliates for no reason whatsoever
Quote
-Elitist douchebaggery from "established" community members
Quote
-Almost exclusively used for copyright infringement purposes
Quote
-Very high potential to be shut down if found by law enforcement (lifetime unstable and may be very short)
Honestly, I don't understand many of your points. It's your view to think public trackers are worth the risk, and mine to like private trackers more for their increased safety, speed, and ability to get torrents up quickly.
EDIT:
Public Trackers:
Increased risk
More users
More content
Occasionally lower speed
Content can be uploaded by anyone
Private Trackers:
Lowered risk
Higher speeds
Less users
Less content
More exclusive content
None.