1.6 planets
DAMN! you guys seem wasteful
I am a Mathematician
2.8, but to be honest, that's bullshit, i re did it to the best of my ability, if I change like 2 things im at 1.0 planets...
None.
2.9, most notably from my shelter and food.
None.
2.8, but to be honest, that's bullshit, i re did it to the best of my ability, if I change like 2 things im at 1.0 planets...
I know, they want us to live in a less than 500 meter apartment with 7 other people
None.
4.5, i bet thats pretty accurate too.
However, you should keep in mind the way were brought into this society, there isn't much we can do to keep it low. Widespread change will happen from change in government. Until then, individual companies will make futile efforts to keep emissions low.
None.
FOOD | 4
MOBILITY | 0.2
SHELTER | 4.7
GOODS/SERVICES | 4.4If everyone lived like you, we would need 3 planets.
FOOD | 2.5
MOBILITY | 0
SHELTER | 2.7
GOODS/SERVICES | 1.7If everyone lived like you, we would need 1.6 planets.
For the appropriate extremes of wasteful/conservative living ( since, obviously, none of the answers match perfectly, and I really don't know too well for some of them ) .
None.
IF EVERYONE LIVED LIKE YOU, WE WOULD NEED 3.9 PLANETS.
Funny, I changed my country selection at the start to Nigeria and it dropped to 1.6 planets.
Post has been edited 1 time(s), last time on Nov 13 2007, 5:31 am by Mini Moose 2707.
IF EVERYONE LIVED LIKE YOU, WE WOULD NEED 4.7 PLANETS.
None.
I think I hold the record low of 1.2.
None.
I think I hold the record low of 1.2.
I THINKS YOUS NEEDS TO READS THE THREADS.
None.
FOOD 5.4
MOBILITY 1.7
SHELTER 3.7
GOODS/SERVICES 4.9
TOTAL FOOTPRINT 16
IN COMPARISON, THE AVERAGE ECOLOGICAL FOOTPRINT IN YOUR COUNTRY IS 24 ACRES PER PERSON.
WORLDWIDE, THERE EXIST 4.5 BIOLOGICALLY PRODUCTIVE ACRES PER PERSON.
IF EVERYONE LIVED LIKE YOU, WE WOULD NEED 3.6 PLANETS.
Oh noez?
None.
FOOD 5.2
MOBILITY 4
SHELTER 10.1
GOODS/SERVICES 9.6
TOTAL FOOTPRINT 29
IN COMPARISON, THE AVERAGE ECOLOGICAL FOOTPRINT IN YOUR COUNTRY IS 24 ACRES PER PERSON.
WORLDWIDE, THERE EXIST 4.5 BIOLOGICALLY PRODUCTIVE ACRES PER PERSON.
IF EVERYONE LIVED LIKE YOU, WE WOULD NEED 6.5 PLANETS.
Teehee.
TinyMap2 - Latest in map compression! ( 7/09/14 - New build! )
EUD Action Enabler - Lightweight EUD/EPD support! (ChaosLauncher/MPQDraft support!)
EUDDB -
topic - Help out by adding your EUDs! Or Submit reference files in the References tab!
MapSketch - New image->map generator!
EUDTrig -
topic - Quickly and easily convert offsets to EUDs! (extended players supported)
SC2 Map Texture Mask Importer/Exporter - Edit texture placement in an image editor!
This page has been viewed [img]http://farty1billion.dyndns.org/Clicky.php?img.gif[/img] times!
3.5 planets. I'm medium-evil. As Corbo would say, "average" evil.
None.
ok ok... Fine... 2nd lowest.
None.
You do realize that devilesk just put the extreme answer on every single one so he could get 1.0 planets, right? That's what he does.
None.
I really would like to know what they use to gauge this... What determines how many acres someone would need?
None.
This test doesn't take enough information...
Anyways, 2.4 planets.
None.
CATEGORY ACRES
FOOD 6.9
MOBILITY 27.9
SHELTER 7.4
GOODS/SERVICES 40
TOTAL FOOTPRINT 82
IN COMPARISON, THE AVERAGE ECOLOGICAL FOOTPRINT IN YOUR COUNTRY IS 24 ACRES PER PERSON.
WORLDWIDE, THERE EXIST 4.5 BIOLOGICALLY PRODUCTIVE ACRES PER PERSON.
IF EVERYONE LIVED LIKE YOU, WE WOULD NEED 18.5 PLANETS.
LAWL