Syphon, learn what an exaggeration is.
The point is, it's a pain in the ass to install stuff. Windows can install DII in literally a minute.
(I only know about DII and LoD, I never installed D1 on my comp, but then again, I assume it's shorter, seeing as it's a much more basic game.)
Learn to use sarcasm marks؟
No it's not. Actually, I prefer installing things in Linux than on Windows. Windows, you have to find installers, download, run them if you don't have a disc, and just pop them in and run them if you do. In Linux, installing things is as easy as
sudo apt-get install n if you don't have a disc, and the program is at all common, and
wine media\cdrom0\install.exe if you do have the disc. Pretty much anything you could ever want on Windows is supported by Wine, and those few programs you can't find in the reps, you download and install just like in Windows.
And no, you cannot install Diablo 2 in 1 minute on Windows. It is over a GB. It took me the same amount of time on Windows and Linux, my brother wanted to play with me.
You don't understand what Time Machine is. It' s backup program.
You don't understand anything you're talking about.
No, many Windows apps break if you try to run them at anything but an admin level. In XP, almost all programs run at administrator level. If they don't, they don't work. Actually, I think Vista has so many incopatibilities because it forced programs to run at a non-admin level.
No, they don't. Some old ones do, no new ones do. And this is the fault of programmers, not Microsoft. "I think" = I Actually have no idea, and want to pad my stupid post.
Yes, you can edit system files with a buffer overflow. System files are protected in OS X so this can't happen.
Yes, yes it can happen. You can do anything conceivable with a large enough buffer overflow, on any system, including corrupting an entire installation of OS X. Accourding to Wikipedia, "A buffer overflow occurs when data written to a buffer, due to insufficient bounds checking, corrupts data values in memory addresses adjacent to the allocated buffer. Most commonly this occurs when copying strings of characters from one buffer to another."
All that needs to be done is an overflow large enough within range. It's in the same physical memory = it can be overwritten.
Also, if a Time Machine drive is full, it will not allow data to be overwritten. It will just tell you to get a new drive. No, I'm not a file system designer, but I have done my research an a BTree is much more effecient.
EDIT: Just to be clear, we aren't discussing hardware here. That means no might mice, keyboards, magnetic plugs, etc.
It won't allow data to be overwritten, assuming that Time Machine is still in charge of that drive. If you're not a file system designer, then how do you know what's efficient and what isn't?
Honestly, just give up. Every single thing you've said has been debunked. We don't care if you use Macs. It doesn't threaten us, stop feeling threatened by us using Windows.
None.