and.... is it true that this hack will be major hit? so interesting but it will be bad news some users hate any hacks.

Attachments:

All my hacks are big hits, also instead of the screenshot why not post that hack of yours up?

EDIT:

Reason why I ask because it isn't hard to draw the rings around the units and I know how much you love to reverse my hacks so I am interested to see if its my hard work you are using.

Post has been edited 1 time(s), last time on Jan 17 2009, 7:08 pm by zynastor.

You could always do a huge EUD check by checking the fog of war, death counts, and what have you to catch hack users. Text detection isn't the best way to antihack.

Hehe. Zynastor himself, for the face-off. Good luck, have fun.

Anyway, as far as EUD goes, you could always go back and fourth, continue patching, finding new method, repeat; until someone gives up. This is like map Protection/Unprotection. The methods are still out there, but are you creative enough to find them?
Deaths aren't the only available condition too, you know.

Also, Zynastor: do you know anything about Storm.dll names? I'm currently working on a list. I have about 70 semi-named ordinals left.

Haha, it looks like my posting about SeN at BW Hacks actually got Zyn to come and check it out for himself

The main problem with these anti-hacks, is that the hacks get patched tons of times, you only release a map once, and as soon as the hack is updated EUD detections become useless, requiring another map update, IMO, it's pretty futile.

Also, Maps, I think that a good visual multicommand hack would be a lot more appreciated than anti hacks, and more useful too.

If you want to truly beat hackers, what you need to do is make an anti-hack third party tool. Perhaps one that detects, with the option of dropping?

The best anti hack would be reading outside of SC's memory address's, but you can't do that since there is an upper limit to EUDs (unless you find another way, which would be even more difficult).

When hacks stop "adding to the fun" and start detracting from competitive play, it's a problem. I have no issues with people who want to cheat with other cheaters, but many games have been destroyed because hackers like to show off what they can do, and SC is definitely part of the way down that road already.

If anyone is going to stop these cheaters, it's Blizzard. A massive CD key banning would be incredible, and I have hopes that it will come to that.

I'm pretty sure there isn't. The player index for conditions is stored as an unsigned long. You could technically read any part of memory you want, as long as it's after the player resource counts.

I believe Farty said there was an upper limit to EUDs since you can only go to player 255?

Well, earlier in this topic you can see that the triggers Maps posted used players well above 255.

my hack isn't include any security, because i don't feel the necessity.
and this is 'starcraft UMS forum' so i never upload my hack in here.
also i don't upload any sites because i'm korean so i don't feel release other countries people :-)

also i found fragile point.. good luck to improving anti-hack fix.

Post has been edited 1 time(s), last time on Jan 18 2009, 1:22 am by Maps.

Owned.

Farty was wrong. I tested it when someone told me it was read as a byte, because I thought they were drugged.

Lol alright, nice excuses.

Also your new triggers were fixed before I made my first post here, took less than 5 minutes. It was nothing special you just found something I patched outside of the range 0x401000 to 0x4FFFFF.

lol are you think you have done perfect patch? this patch is need to more strong.

No idea what your trying to say, sorry. Also where do I think I done this 'perfect' patch of what?

oh, then this is my 'misunderstand'. SORRY.

this trigger now detect ZynMaphack v1.0.6f

Make that an anti-hack client with auto updater



Does that help, Maps?

DK's word should always surpass mine when it comes to these things. >:O

Different trigger, nice and easy.