1.6 planets DAMN! you guys seem wasteful

1.6 planets
DAMN! you guys seem wasteful

2.8, but to be honest, that's bullshit, i re did it to the best of my ability, if I change like 2 things im at 1.0 planets...

2.8, but to be honest, that's bullshit, i re did it to the best of my ability, if I change like 2 things im at 1.0 planets...

2.9, most notably from my shelter and food.

2.9, most notably from my shelter and food.

[QUOTE]2.8, but to be honest, that's bullshit, i re did it to the best of my ability, if I change like 2 things im at 1.0 planets...[/QUOTE] I know, they want us to live in a less than 500 meter apartment with 7 other people :/

Quote

2.8, but to be honest, that's bullshit, i re did it to the best of my ability, if I change like 2 things im at 1.0 planets...

I know, they want us to live in a less than 500 meter apartment with 7 other people :/

4.5, i bet thats pretty accurate too. However, you should keep in mind the way were brought into this society, there isn't much we can do to keep it low. Widespread change will happen from change in government. Until then, individual companies will make futile efforts to keep emissions low.

4.5, i bet thats pretty accurate too.
However, you should keep in mind the way were brought into this society, there isn't much we can do to keep it low. Widespread change will happen from change in government. Until then, individual companies will make futile efforts to keep emissions low.

[size=8]FOOD | 4 MOBILITY | 0.2 SHELTER | 4.7 GOODS/SERVICES | 4.4[/size] If everyone lived like you, we would need 3 planets. [size=8]FOOD | 2.5 MOBILITY | 0 SHELTER | 2.7 GOODS/SERVICES | 1.7[/size] If everyone lived like you, we would need 1.6 planets. For the appropriate extremes of wasteful/conservative living ( since, obviously, none of the answers match perfectly, and I really don't know too well for some of them ) .

FOOD | 4
MOBILITY | 0.2
SHELTER | 4.7
GOODS/SERVICES | 4.4
If everyone lived like you, we would need 3 planets.
FOOD | 2.5
MOBILITY | 0
SHELTER | 2.7
GOODS/SERVICES | 1.7
If everyone lived like you, we would need 1.6 planets.

For the appropriate extremes of wasteful/conservative living ( since, obviously, none of the answers match perfectly, and I really don't know too well for some of them ) .

IF EVERYONE LIVED LIKE YOU, WE WOULD NEED 3.9 PLANETS. Funny, I changed my country selection at the start to Nigeria and it dropped to 1.6 planets.

IF EVERYONE LIVED LIKE YOU, WE WOULD NEED 3.9 PLANETS.

Funny, I changed my country selection at the start to Nigeria and it dropped to 1.6 planets.

IF EVERYONE LIVED LIKE YOU, WE WOULD NEED 4.7 PLANETS.

IF EVERYONE LIVED LIKE YOU, WE WOULD NEED 4.7 PLANETS.

I think I hold the record low of 1.2.

I think I hold the record low of 1.2.

[quote=Akar]I think I hold the record low of 1.2.[/quote] I THINKS YOUS NEEDS TO READS THE THREADS.

Quote from Akar

I think I hold the record low of 1.2.

I THINKS YOUS NEEDS TO READS THE THREADS.

FOOD 5.4 MOBILITY 1.7 SHELTER 3.7 GOODS/SERVICES 4.9 TOTAL FOOTPRINT 16 IN COMPARISON, THE AVERAGE ECOLOGICAL FOOTPRINT IN YOUR COUNTRY IS 24 ACRES PER PERSON. WORLDWIDE, THERE EXIST 4.5 BIOLOGICALLY PRODUCTIVE ACRES PER PERSON. IF EVERYONE LIVED LIKE YOU, WE WOULD NEED 3.6 PLANETS. Oh noez?

FOOD 5.4
MOBILITY 1.7
SHELTER 3.7
GOODS/SERVICES 4.9
TOTAL FOOTPRINT 16

IN COMPARISON, THE AVERAGE ECOLOGICAL FOOTPRINT IN YOUR COUNTRY IS 24 ACRES PER PERSON.

WORLDWIDE, THERE EXIST 4.5 BIOLOGICALLY PRODUCTIVE ACRES PER PERSON.

IF EVERYONE LIVED LIKE YOU, WE WOULD NEED 3.6 PLANETS.

Oh noez?

I got 'apple' :|

I got 'apple'

3.2! o_O;

3.2! o_O;

FOOD 5.2 MOBILITY 4 SHELTER 10.1 GOODS/SERVICES 9.6 TOTAL FOOTPRINT 29 IN COMPARISON, THE AVERAGE ECOLOGICAL FOOTPRINT IN YOUR COUNTRY IS 24 ACRES PER PERSON. WORLDWIDE, THERE EXIST 4.5 BIOLOGICALLY PRODUCTIVE ACRES PER PERSON. IF EVERYONE LIVED LIKE YOU, WE WOULD NEED 6.5 PLANETS. Teehee.

FOOD 5.2
MOBILITY 4
SHELTER 10.1
GOODS/SERVICES 9.6
TOTAL FOOTPRINT 29
IN COMPARISON, THE AVERAGE ECOLOGICAL FOOTPRINT IN YOUR COUNTRY IS 24 ACRES PER PERSON.
WORLDWIDE, THERE EXIST 4.5 BIOLOGICALLY PRODUCTIVE ACRES PER PERSON.
IF EVERYONE LIVED LIKE YOU, WE WOULD NEED 6.5 PLANETS.

Teehee.

3.5 planets. I'm medium-evil. As Corbo would say, "average" evil. :P

3.5 planets. I'm medium-evil. As Corbo would say, "average" evil.

ok ok... Fine... 2nd lowest.

ok ok... Fine... 2nd lowest.

You do realize that devilesk just put the extreme answer on every single one so he could get 1.0 planets, right? That's what he does. :P

You do realize that devilesk just put the extreme answer on every single one so he could get 1.0 planets, right? That's what he does.

I really would like to know what they use to gauge this... What determines how many acres someone would need?

I really would like to know what they use to gauge this... What determines how many acres someone would need?

This test doesn't take enough information... Anyways, 2.4 planets.

This test doesn't take enough information...

Anyways, 2.4 planets.

CATEGORY ACRES FOOD 6.9 MOBILITY 27.9 SHELTER 7.4 GOODS/SERVICES 40 TOTAL FOOTPRINT 82 IN COMPARISON, THE AVERAGE ECOLOGICAL FOOTPRINT IN YOUR COUNTRY IS 24 ACRES PER PERSON. WORLDWIDE, THERE EXIST 4.5 BIOLOGICALLY PRODUCTIVE ACRES PER PERSON. IF EVERYONE LIVED LIKE YOU, WE WOULD NEED 18.5 PLANETS. LAWL

CATEGORY ACRES
FOOD 6.9
MOBILITY 27.9
SHELTER 7.4
GOODS/SERVICES 40
TOTAL FOOTPRINT 82



IN COMPARISON, THE AVERAGE ECOLOGICAL FOOTPRINT IN YOUR COUNTRY IS 24 ACRES PER PERSON.

WORLDWIDE, THERE EXIST 4.5 BIOLOGICALLY PRODUCTIVE ACRES PER PERSON.



IF EVERYONE LIVED LIKE YOU, WE WOULD NEED 18.5 PLANETS.

LAWL