Maps, try randomized trigger generation.
Be sure that you are executing actions for normal users AND hack users within the same memory region.

But don't give up. I want to see the evolution of this little battle between you two.

but actually this little battle will must my defeat.
i'm trying to method hardly, but Zyn just download my attachments and check how it work, and just patch.

He only patches the specific cases, there are still many other methods remaining.

not yet.

Zynastor doesn't make speific cases patch. more useful algorithm.

Algorithms are made to be broken.

Posted hacks violate the rules and would be deleted.

Would it be useful to make a few hundred EUD triggers that might be the the anti-hack, just to give anyone trying to figure out what it does a headache? I don't know enough to know if StarCraft can be traced in order to figure out which trigger is actually running. If not, let Zynastor show how much he's willing to work in order to piss off people who want to play games fairly.

Maps, how about you stop posting your antihacks publicly and release it only to all the pro clans who you no are against hacking. What you really need to do is make it harder for Zynastor to get his hands on your work. I'm sure he isn't willing to lurk in obs matches hoping to download your newest release.

Too bad EUD actions (or similar) still don't exist... I've thought out a whole headache of an issue for blocking anti-hacking.
Somehow make it so if the anti-hack is blocked, then they drop too.

This would only work once for each anti-hack, because as soon as someone who is used to hacking gets his hands on the map, Zynastor gets a copy.

A miss is as good as a mile.
(is it right expression?)

Clans, I think that entirely defeats the anti-hack on another front: Usage.

What good is working on an anti-hack if it isn't as available to those that want to use it as the hack is to the people that want to hack?

If the method isn't good enough to be made public, it shouldn't be used at all.

What about v1.0.6g?

some users send PM me, 'don't post it publicy.'
i think it's more effective method rather than 'a little war of attrition'.

i'm thinking and thinking.
v.1.0.6g trigger is already patch, but i think its realease.

It's a chance for people who seriously want to play a game without hacking to get organized.

Scenario A: zyn downloads the antihack directly in a matter of seconds and updates his hack.

Scenario B: zyn eventually gets an email from some kid, that he probably doesn't really know, and checks the antihack to fix his hack. The kid is a acker so he is probably dumb, and might have just given him an old version that he already fixed a while back. Suddenly zynastor is spening all his time sorting through his mailbox trying to find the newest antihack, while wasting who knows how much time on false-positives. He publicly posts his hack, and then Maps creates his antihack for it. Maps doesn't have to go through any hassle like zynastor does, and has the advantage in the war of attrition, not to mention his antihack is valid for longer amounts of time than in scenario A, which was only at the most.

I'll go with scenario B.

I Agree with Clans

Sorry for the inconvenience, I realized what I posted could be considered Trolling or outright flaming [not of any member, but of the US policies in general]. I figured I might as well apologize before my post gets deleted anyways.

So basically we have people making hacks and anti-hacks constantly. yay. so much for people playing Starcraft just for fun...

Post has been edited 1 time(s), last time on Jan 18 2009, 7:38 pm by poison_us.

Iccup+antihack? Seems reasonably easy to pull off.

Some of us play games other than melee at high levels of competition.