Well, I hate to do this, as EzDay has been speaking for me (somewhat), but on top of Fatal's interpretation, I noticed this:


Those who have played before when EzDay was mafia should know that he usually manages to escape any suspicion. These are two interpretations (mine and Fatal's) that I see as about as close to reliable as a clue interpretation ever will be. However, I am reluctant to throw EzDay under the bus, as I've already said. I'm going to keep searching.

That's a really stupid interpretation. Comon, you can do better than that. I highly doubt that Moose would write a clue about a person's agenda this early into the game.

I almost want to thank you for bringing up a clue against me that kinda makes sense, after being twice voted for practically without reason, although I suppose it could just as easily point to DTBK... especially considering the game in which I was mafia with him, and he managed to off both of Dan's bodyguards.
Also, for the lulz:

Except that it's not even "garbled". Hell, if anything, let's all vote for Reindeer Breeder! Atleast the "Eskimo = Greenland/Alaska" isn't logically flawed, only sensibly.
History shows that the most reasonable interpretations we could come up with would be based on the threads, maps, and mods people have made.

Um, it's actually not stupid? Moose didn't write the clues, Dan did. And thinking about it, that would make sense for Dan to bring the thing about avoiding suspicion up for DTBK, since it was him that DTBK totally fooled (everyone else too, but Dan gave away his bodyguards and got raped).

Why not?

Look at all of moose's clues from last game, and you'll see why. I'm pretty sure that DapperDan only does clues on hard facts, too.

That's speculation. I think you're wrong ;o

What you're saying is also speculation, and not hard fact.

I don't think you realize that the clues will be on whatever the fuck Moose and Dapperdan want.

I like your interpretation here.. it is convincing.

Quote

I could have sworn the name of the wasn't SEN MAFIA IX: Abstain. Maybe I'm mistaken. I remember the days when people didn't use to abstain . . . good times.

There were also days where clues were written with a grain of sanity and they could be deciphered. Last game's clues were ridiculous.

This.

I just figured out something. If the innocent thing is a clue.. And if Greo said back on page 10 makes sense.. Then last game holds clues.

Who, all of last game, strove to prove their innocence? I vote DTBK.

But Greo said thinking like that is stupid, and why would there be a clue like that?

DTBK was not just trying to keep himself alive, but take out NerdyTerdy too.
Usually anyone who is blamed to be mafia will try to prove otherwise.

Maybe "FRAGILE" is backwards to show that its the opposite of FRAGILE?

Who gets hard when they think of Mafia? Or Dapperdan?

...

Well, DTBK has been known to disapprove of me chasing after females. Maybe it's him ;o

In all seriousness though, it could mean it has something to do with the opposite of FRAGILE. Take Long cats enemy, Tactrohs for example (really long black cat). Or the evil "Ogel" guy from Lego.

Both are opposites of what they spell forwards (Lego=fun Ogel=No fun btw.)

Post has been edited 1 time(s), last time on Oct 20 2008, 1:13 am by Hug A Zergling.