| Xx.Doom.xX | Sep 7 2007, 12:04 am | Post #42 |
|
They aren't. |
||
![]() |
| AntiSleep | Sep 7 2007, 2:04 am | Post #44 |
|
The more minerals you have, the bigger your penis.
Seriously now, whats the point? If something is useful, why make people accumulate minerals for it? If something is not useful, why code for it at all? |
||
![]() I do not respect your beliefs, and I implore you not to respect mine. To ask respect of beliefs held without evidence, is to burn the books of progress and hope. - The Village IconoClast |
| Nintendo_Confed | Sep 7 2007, 2:35 am | Post #45 |
|
Full time WoW, for now...
|
Moogle's minerals are. Um i have 19 posts and i still have -200 minerals. (yes i posted after minerals were set up) EDIT:Nevermind, this post did the trick
|
||
| Oo.Twitch.oO | Sep 7 2007, 4:23 am | Post #46 |
|
Person Of All Kinds
|
Houston we have a problem avatars can't be over 15kb mening gif's
.
|
||
| |
Sep 7 2007, 4:26 am | Post #47 |
|
.If you said that in english, im guessing its something about not uploading big animated gifs, in which I say, its a good thing. |
||
| Oo.Twitch.oO | Sep 7 2007, 4:47 am | Post #48 |
|
Person Of All Kinds
|
Well I said it in english but,I was just being funny geez.Anyways you still got the point.
|
||
| Falkoner | Sep 7 2007, 4:55 am | Post #49 |
|
Taking StarCraft Map Making to the Limit!
|
Hence we'll never see a top posters function anywhere. But seriously, we should just ban everyone with over 200 posts. What about me? I've only posted about 4 times in the Null forum! Besides, most of the people with over 200 posts are still very low in minerals, as you only get them for posts over one line, and most spammers don't post much more than 1 line. |
||
| |
Sep 7 2007, 5:01 am | Post #50 |
|
Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?
|
Actually.... most of the people with over 200 posts had a lot to say before minerals were implemented. Boy, they sure missed out on a lot of cash.
|
||
![]() [11:59:05] devilesk: make some allusions to literature [11:59:48] devilesk: make it subtle [12:02:13] Moose: I don't need or want to be told how to make clues. [12:02:19] devilesk: im not telling [12:02:21] devilesk: i'm suggesting [12:05:11] devilesk: it doesn't look like a command [12:05:12] devilesk: sound like one |
| (U)devilesk | Sep 7 2007, 5:03 am | Post #51 |
|
Classic
|
Hence we'll never see a top posters function anywhere. But seriously, we should just ban everyone with over 200 posts. What about me? I've only posted about 4 times in the Null forum! Besides, most of the people with over 200 posts are still very low in minerals, as you only get them for posts over one line, and most spammers don't post much more than 1 line. Oh man I was gonna post earlier about how the serious discussion forum was just as bad as null in quality and your posts are some of the worst. So now that you've posted I feel I can now express my opinion. An example is the Homosexuality topic. Pages 2 to 6 disgust me. Serious discussion is like null, except the posts there are longer, because there's more meaningless crap to "discuss". Yea you bastard My dozen topics in map showcase that I wasted on the first day
|
||
![]() Re: Will Maphack be allowed in SC2? for LAST TIME MAPHACK IS NOT CHEAT. is ROCKET BOOSTER INTO SPACE CHEAT? ROCKET BOOSTER INTO SPACE MAKE SPACE TRAVEL EASIER BUT NOT CHEAT. THEREFORE, MAPHACK IS NOT CHEAT. WOW YOU PEOPLE ARE STUPIDS!!!! While playing Soldat: Bravo Team Member: staying two seconds at one place is not camping.. Alpha Team Member: ya.. and putting ur cock into a vag is not sex |
| Gillette | Sep 7 2007, 8:16 am | Post #52 |
|
Are there any consequences to having negative minerals? If not, then disabling fun wouldnt really matter, since its the equivalent of post count (aka e-penis) anyway.
At least its a little more refined that before. Hopefully, the shop items will be cooler this time around. edit: Also, I mightve missed it, but what are anti-minerals? |
||
![]() |
| Cnl.Fatso | Sep 7 2007, 3:43 pm | Post #54 |
|
Not just here for the pie
|
Bah. You have no sense of wordage, then. In fact, I am capable of making a post with the same amount of information last at least three times as long with the help of a decent vocabulary and some creative writing skills.
EDIT: And actually yesterday I wrote a 200-word poetry response in one sentence. EDIT2: And it was for English. |
||
![]() Seems to you the thing to do would be to isolate the winner. Unless it doesn't, in which case never mind. |
| |
Sep 7 2007, 3:52 pm | Post #55 |
|
and she's STILL hawt
|
Cnl.Fatso, you are just asking for a mineral nuke, aren't you...
|
||
![]() Things to know: The squeaky wheel gets the grease Working on: Forums & polls. Should be done tonight. Next in line: DLDB tools for dldb managers, Message center, Mod night... |
| Cnl.Fatso | Sep 7 2007, 10:24 pm | Post #56 |
|
Not just here for the pie
|
No, I'm not. I'm flaunting my talent for excess verbiage. There's a subtle difference.
Is there anything particularly wrong with that? |
||
![]() Seems to you the thing to do would be to isolate the winner. Unless it doesn't, in which case never mind. |
| |
Sep 7 2007, 10:42 pm | Post #57 |
|
Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?
|
Not everyone may be cognizant of the vernacular used in your bombast, but it's fine by me.
|
||
![]() [11:59:05] devilesk: make some allusions to literature [11:59:48] devilesk: make it subtle [12:02:13] Moose: I don't need or want to be told how to make clues. [12:02:19] devilesk: im not telling [12:02:21] devilesk: i'm suggesting [12:05:11] devilesk: it doesn't look like a command [12:05:12] devilesk: sound like one |
| Money | Sep 7 2007, 11:03 pm | Post #58 |
|
i has title
|
They aren't. I enabled again.
|
||
| Voyager7456[MM] | Sep 8 2007, 1:53 pm | Post #59 |
|
<3
|
Question: are we supposed to get minerals for editing our posts? Because I tried editing, making no changes and then posting and got minerals for it every time.
|
||
![]() They will see us waving from such great heights "Come down now," they'll say But everything looks perfect from far away "Come down now," but we'll stay |
| Syphon[MM] | Sep 8 2007, 3:27 pm | Post #60 |
|
Your lexicon perusing adroitness is meritorious, and I acquiesce with your lulz. |
||
![]() |