Why disable fun...its so...so fun...
The more minerals you have, the bigger your penis.
Seriously now, whats the point? If something is useful, why make people accumulate minerals for it? If something is not useful, why code for it at all?
None.
Moogle's minerals are.
Um i have 19 posts and i still have -200 minerals. (yes i posted after minerals were set up)
EDIT:Nevermind, this post did the trick
None.
Houston we have a problem avatars can't be over 15kb mening gif's
.
None.
Houston we have a problem avatars can't be over 15kb mening gif's
.
If you said that in english, im guessing its something about not uploading big animated gifs, in which I say, its a good thing.
None.
Well I said it in english but,I was just being funny geez.Anyways you still got the point.
None.
Quote from Mini Moose 2707
Hence we'll never see a top posters function anywhere. But seriously, we should just ban everyone with over 200 posts.
What about me? I've only posted about 4 times in the Null forum!
Besides, most of the people with over 200 posts are still very low in minerals, as you only get them for posts over one line, and most spammers don't post much more than 1 line.
None.
Actually.... most of the people with over 200 posts had a lot to say before minerals were implemented. Boy, they sure missed out on a lot of cash.
Quote from Mini Moose 2707
Hence we'll never see a top posters function anywhere. But seriously, we should just ban everyone with over 200 posts.
What about me? I've only posted about 4 times in the Null forum!
Besides, most of the people with over 200 posts are still very low in minerals, as you only get them for posts over one line, and most spammers don't post much more than 1 line.
Oh man I was gonna post earlier about how the serious discussion forum was just as bad as null in quality and your posts are some of the worst. So now that you've posted I feel I can now express my opinion. An example is the Homosexuality topic. Pages 2 to 6 disgust me.
Serious discussion is like null, except the posts there are longer, because there's more meaningless crap to "discuss".
Actually.... most of the people with over 200 posts had a lot to say before minerals were implemented. Boy, they sure missed out on a lot of cash.
Yea you bastard
My dozen topics in map showcase that I wasted on the first day
None.
Are there any consequences to having negative minerals? If not, then disabling fun wouldnt really matter, since its the equivalent of post count (aka e-penis) anyway.
At least its a little more refined that before. Hopefully, the shop items will be cooler this time around.
edit: Also, I mightve missed it, but what are anti-minerals?
None.
gonna take bare long to get to 0 minerals lol.
None.
Bah. You have no sense of wordage, then. In fact, I am capable of making a post with the same amount of information last at least three times as long with the help of a decent vocabulary and some creative writing skills.
EDIT: And actually yesterday I wrote a 200-word poetry response in one sentence.
EDIT2: And it was for English.
None.
Cnl.Fatso, you are just asking for a mineral nuke, aren't you...
None.
No, I'm not. I'm flaunting my talent for excess verbiage. There's a subtle difference.
Is there anything particularly wrong with that?
None.
Not everyone may be cognizant of the vernacular used in your bombast, but it's fine by me.
Responsible for my own happiness? I can't even be responsible for my own breakfast
Question: are we supposed to get minerals for editing our posts? Because I tried editing, making no changes and then posting and got minerals for it every time.
Quote from Mini Moose 2707
Not everyone may be cognizant of the vernacular used in your bombast, but it's fine by me.
Your lexicon perusing adroitness is meritorious, and I acquiesce with your lulz.
None.