Staredit Network > Forums > Technology & Computers > Topic: New iPods!!!
New iPods!!!
Sep 5 2007, 10:11 pm
By: ToA  

Sep 5 2007, 10:11 pm ToA Post #1

Que Sera, Sera.

http://www.apple.com/ipodtouch/

http://www.apple.com/ipodclassic/

http://www.apple.com/ipodnano/

http://www.apple.com/ipodshuffle/

Whoa.

Seriously liek new.




Sep 5 2007, 10:42 pm ~:Deathawk:~ Post #2



I like the iPod Classic the best, especially the fact that it has an all metal enclosure now, no more of the plastic junk.



None.

Sep 5 2007, 10:49 pm Sie_Sayoka Post #3



the nano and shuffle have been out for quite some time. hmm the touch looks just like an iphone D:



None.

Sep 5 2007, 10:56 pm ToA Post #4

Que Sera, Sera.

Quote from ~:Deathawk:~
I like the iPod Classic the best, especially the fact that it has an all metal enclosure now, no more of the plastic junk.


So true, and about the nano is plays VIDEO now and the shuffle has smexy new colors

But uh oh from what i can see it doesnt seem as the new cover flow option is available in the second newest ipod classic O_O

Post has been edited 1 time(s), last time on Sep 5 2007, 11:21 pm by ToA.




Sep 6 2007, 12:46 am AgeNt_ Post #5



i have a nano and i like it the way it is. i dont really want speciel stuff like that. but the classic looks cool



None.

Sep 6 2007, 3:16 am Matt Burch Post #6



I have the old ipod shuffle, the big white thing that looks like a long erasor. I like it though. I just go to computer class, plug this into the back of the computer, and use firefox to bypass the security systems set on IE, and download whatever i want. without it recording anything I was doing. :D



None.

Sep 6 2007, 10:33 am Dr. Shotgun Post #7



iPods are severely overrated.

I'm tired of hearing Apple hype. It's just a fucking mp3 player.

When I see five iPod stories on digg front page, I bury them.



None.

Sep 6 2007, 1:09 pm Falkoner Post #8



Wow, the nano is fat now.

That iPod touched looks like an iPhone with a few functions missing.



None.

Sep 6 2007, 2:08 pm Gerrard2060 Post #9



Touch looks like a computer - mp3 player
Classic looks like a classic.
Nano looks fat and flat like iPod.
Shuffle is my favorite.



None.

Sep 6 2007, 7:30 pm Money Post #10



I like my nano, the square is better than the round.



None.

Sep 6 2007, 11:56 pm ~:Deathawk:~ Post #11



Quote from Falkoner
Wow, the nano is fat now.

That iPod touched looks like an iPhone with a few functions missing.
That's sort of because that's what it basically is.



None.

Sep 7 2007, 12:03 am dumbducky Post #12



All of them are lame. I've got a nearly 3 year old refurbished iPod that is essentially the same as all the new ones, minus color. Like I care.



tits

Sep 7 2007, 11:05 am Voyager7456 Post #13

Responsible for my own happiness? I can't even be responsible for my own breakfast

The 160GB iPod Classic is nice, but nothing that I'd be willing to pay money for so soon. The iPod Touch looks great, but the storage is a bit low...



all i am is a contrary canary
but i'm crazy for you
i watched you cradling a tissue box
sneezing and sniffling, you were still a fox


Modding Resources: The Necromodicon [WIP] | Mod Night
My Projects: SCFC | ARAI | Excision [WIP] | SCFC2 [BETA] | Robots vs. Humans | Leviathan Wakes [BETA]


Sep 7 2007, 12:35 pm Clokr_ Post #14



I have one of the old iPod's nano and I hate that it doesn't support video just because apple programmers were too lazy adapt it. I was thinking about dling that linux software for iPod, but it is a bit scary :/
Still, the could have added video into the iPod nano without changing it's look at all, now it is just too fat...



?????

Sep 7 2007, 10:33 pm ~:Deathawk:~ Post #15



At least now watching videos on the Nano wouldn't he horrible. I wouldn't want to watch a video on a screen that small as the first and second generation Nano :\



None.

Sep 7 2007, 10:39 pm Money Post #16



Quote from Voyager7456
The 160GB iPod Classic is nice, but nothing that I'd be willing to pay money for so soon. The iPod Touch looks great, but the storage is a bit low...

It can do this: http://www.apple.com/ipodtouch/features.html?feature=safari



None.

Sep 8 2007, 12:49 am Echo Post #17



Ipods are overrated. I prefer Zune (Pronounced Zun-y). Bigger screen, same space, faster, better and more durable.



None.

Sep 8 2007, 12:53 am dumbducky Post #18



If my iPod ever breaks, I'd go with a Zune. I don't think I have any bought songs from iTunes anyway.



tits

Sep 8 2007, 12:54 am ~:Deathawk:~ Post #19



Bigger screen using the same resolution = worse picture.
Same space..? Uhh, 50 dollars for the Classic now for 166% more space.
Faster, better, more durable? I don't know where you got those. It may be faster.. not sure why you would want an mp3 player that is faster... regardless, iPod classic definitely isn't held back because it's not fast enough... more durable..? Could you explain..?



None.

Sep 8 2007, 1:11 am Praetor Post #20

layin' in the cut

Wow, those are all so damn sexy... I wish the Touch had HD instead of flash though, so you could get a 160GB touch :P



this too shall pass

Options
  Back to forum
Please log in to reply to this topic or to report it.
Members in this topic: None.
[11:52 pm]
UEDCommander -- What else could it be
[11:52 pm]
UEDCommander -- Of course
[11:52 pm]
UEDCommander -- Third
[10:57 pm]
Pr0nogo -- at least the 3rd campaign had voice acting
[10:57 pm]
Pr0nogo -- i streamed every campaign in that disaster and it was truly terrible the whole way through
[10:56 pm]
Pr0nogo -- yeah they did
[04:27 pm]
IlyaSnopchenko -- if they did it was a good way to have your ears AND eyes bleeding at the same time :D
[04:27 pm]
IlyaSnopchenko -- I forgot did VOTF have the voiceovers ripped from that anime
[04:26 pm]
IlyaSnopchenko -- And I forgot who the author pasted Ranma over... Jim Raynor marine unit methinks.
[04:26 pm]
IlyaSnopchenko -- Akane certainly wasn't :)
Please log in to shout.


Members Online: MidNighTime, Roy, C(a)HeK