Mistake in CHK format for UNIS/UNIx? (Topic)

Staredit Network > Forums > SC1 UMS Mapmaking Assistance > Topic: Mistake in CHK format for UNIS/UNIx?

Mistake in CHK format for UNIS/UNIx?

Mar 22 2019, 1:51 am
By: sethmachine

Pages: 1

Mar 22 2019, 1:51 am sethmachine Post #1

See the spec here: http://www.starcraftai.com/wiki/CHK_Format#.22UNIS.22_-_Unit_Settings

It says that there are 228 u16s for weapon damage / weapon upgrade bonus:

Quote

u16[228]: Base weapon damage the weapon does, in weapon ID order (#List of Unit Weapon IDs)
u16[228]: Upgrade bonus weapon damage, in weapon ID order

However, If I try reading more than 130 u16s for those sections, I run out of bytes to read. I think the format should say this:

Quote

u16[130]: Base weapon damage the weapon does, in weapon ID order (#List of Unit Weapon IDs)
u16[130]: Upgrade bonus weapon damage, in weapon ID order

None.

Mar 22 2019, 1:54 am

O)FaRTy1billion[MM] Post #2

👻 👾 👽 💪

Yes, you are correct. iirc UNIS should have 100 and UNIx should have 130.

TinyMap2 - Latest in map compression! ( 7/09/14 - New build! )
EUD Action Enabler - Lightweight EUD/EPD support! (ChaosLauncher/MPQDraft support!)
EUDDB - topic - Help out by adding your EUDs! Or Submit reference files in the References tab!
MapSketch - New image->map generator!
EUDTrig - topic - Quickly and easily convert offsets to EUDs! (extended players supported)
SC2 Map Texture Mask Importer/Exporter - Edit texture placement in an image editor!
$\:farty\:$ This page has been viewed [img]http://farty1billion.dyndns.org/Clicky.php?img.gif[/img] times!

Mar 22 2019, 2:06 am sethmachine Post #3

Alright, how do we update that page so it's correct?

While a slight mistake, this is a little concerning.

What other mistakes could there be in that CHK specification page?

None.

Mar 22 2019, 6:15 pm

O)FaRTy1billion[MM] Post #4

👻 👾 👽 💪

I think you have to have an account on the wiki to be able to make edits.

I'm not sure why those values were changed to 228, they are correct in the source article linked at the top of the page.

No other mistakes jump out at me, but that doesn't mean there aren't any more. XD

Options

Pages: 1

Back to forum
Please log in to reply to this topic or to report it.
Members in this topic: None.

Global Shoutbox

[06:51 pm]

Vrael -- It is, and I could definitely use a company with a commitment to flexibility, quality, and customer satisfaction to provide effective solutions to dampness and humidity in my urban environment.

[06:50 pm]

NudeRaider -- Vrael

Vrael shouted: Idk, I was looking more for a dehumidifer company which maybe stands out as a beacon of relief amidst damp and unpredictable climates of bustling metropolises. Not sure Amazon qualifies

sounds like moisture control is often a pressing concern in your city

[06:50 pm]

Vrael -- Maybe here on the StarEdit Network I could look through the Forums for some Introductions to people who care about the Topics of Dehumidifiers and Carpet Cleaning?

[06:49 pm]

Vrael -- Perhaps even here I on the StarEdit Network I could look for some Introductions.

[06:48 pm]

Vrael -- On this Topic, I could definitely use some Introductions.

[06:48 pm]

Vrael -- Perhaps that utilizes cutting-edge technology and eco-friendly cleaning products?

[06:47 pm]

Vrael -- Do you know anyone with a deep understanding of the unique characteristics of your carpets, ensuring they receive the specialized care they deserve?

[06:45 pm]

NudeRaider -- Vrael

Vrael shouted: I've also recently becoming interested in Carpet Cleaning, but I'd like to find someone with a reputation for unparalleled quality and attention to detail.

beats me, but I'd make sure to pick the epitome of excellence and nothing less.

[06:41 pm]

Vrael -- It seems like I may need Introductions to multiple companies for the Topics that I care deeply about, even as early as Today, 6:03 am.

[06:38 pm]

Vrael -- I need a go-to solution and someone who understands that Carpets are more than just decorative elements in my home.

Please log in to shout.

Members Online:

Roy