You know nothing.

Ahha! That must be why I can't remember ever making some of the posts that have my username to the left of it!

Well, you know, the opposite of Evolved. Lol.

There's no such thing as an opposite of evolution. If you think there is, you have a flawed idea of what evolution is.

Evolution is not the increasing complexity of a species over time, for example.

But wouldn't we use less energy if we didn't move or something? or produce more energy then normal if an impulse to our brain said "Produce more heat"?

Energy goes into the body, an equal amount of energy comes out.

Yes, but I believe the idea behind that was that we take nutrients and calories and such and act as converters to heat, an energy that the machines are able to use.


How do you know we aren't in the Matrix right now!??!

So it IS possible.

You take the red Mike n Ike, you stay in wonderland...

...Exactly. And that energy comes form no where. There's no sun on Earth, so plants can photosynthesise either. All energy is leaving the system through body heat in the humans, and electric output in the machines, assuming the dead bodies are perfectly recycled (impossible) and there is no actual input, so in the movies the machines are powered by nothing.

Energy can't be created or destroyed, so if no energy is entering, then nothing is leaving either.

Well, I guess it would be possible for people to exist in a virtual reality. If you're refering to the fact that humans were used as batteries, not so much.

Also, if the sun were to be blacked out by the sky, life would probably still go on. Although life as we think of it is based off the sun, there are ecosystems which are based on volcanic vents and would not be adversly effected by it.

The energy breaks down into less useful forms, such as heat energy, which cannot be reconverted into an equal amount of useful energy.

Howard K.
I've seen two posts from you, neither of which made sense.

The answer to this is ... No.
But what if... No.
But if we... No.
Imagine if... No.
Could it be true, if... No.
What if we are in the... No.

No there is not a Matrix and no, there's not going to be a matrix either. Likewise, life is not a dream.

As pointed out, this argument/ debate/ inquiry/ whatever 'this' is. Mirrors that of God vs no God. There isn't any supporting evidence for either case. (No god either BTW)

And /none can be used to power the machines/

Jeez.

With our technology, but this is a futuristic society.


Obviously there was plenty of energy already on the Earth before the sky was blackened, that energy remains there.

Guys, I'm not trying to argue that it's logical, I'm just saying that it's not entirely ridiculous, although admittedly a better idea for the machines would have been to just use the Earth's core to power them, but then we wouldn't have an epic trilogy

It would be wiser to use thermonuclear reactors.

And the sequels sucked hard.

No, this is basic physical principle. Heat is the most chaotic state of energy. You must direct the energy somehow (=convert) to make it useable (drive a machine, etc.). Except if your application is heating, melting substances, or destroying ferromagnetic fields.

No, just soft.

Dead bodies were being used to feed the humans, and the humans provided energy.

How the hell do you know...agent...