ALL PRAISE YOUR SUPREME LORD CORBO
Quote from name:Dark_Marine
-1
Everyone minus 5 people want the old v4 skin. Make that and you get +9001
I hate when people just say stuff for no reason (sorry dm), so let's do this. Open Poll!
Nothing will change anyway but for future reference...
fuck you all
I don't remember it specifically.
But I don't remember disliking it, so I wouldn't mind it.
I voted 'yes'.
None.
Man, I loved that skin... please bring it back. *pouts*
(Of course, that's if it's the skin I think it was.)
None.
I want all skins except Carbonite deleted.
That, or take carbonite, and instead of having a fixed middle and repeating gutters, have fixed gutters and a stretchy middle.
That or I can make a Falkoner skin for all of us
None.
You mean the option of using it, not forcing it back to that way right?
Stolen from Jamal, I wish we had our names like that still.
None.
Just here for the activity... well not really
yesyesyes
Classic Skin's classic-ness is not enough. We need the full thing.
guy lifting weight (animated smiley):
O-IC
OI-C
"Oh, I see it"
Funny how you've been downgraded Ultimo, whereas I, who didn't show up until 10 months later (or so) am a vet. Also, that pic made me a little sad
.
Also, I voted no. We don't need it. If you want it, classic is pretty close...
the annoying 2 different greens is the only thing that bothers me about the default.
"Parliamentary inquiry, Mr. Chairman - do we have to call the Gentleman a gentleman if he's not one?"
I want the promised v5 with the customized personal background posts.
None.
v4 was great, and the skin has a lot of nostalgic value but I don't think SEN should live on the past like that, especially not with SC2 coming.
None.
ALL PRAISE YOUR SUPREME LORD CORBO
I want the promised v5 with the customized personal background posts.
OH GOD!
I remember that! I had this nice moon background.
fuck you all
OH GOD!
I remember that! I had this nice moon background.
Yeah! What happened to that? The current v5 isn't really anything like the promise land.
None.
Funny how you've been downgraded Ultimo, whereas I, who didn't show up until 10 months later (or so) am a vet. Also, that pic made me a little sad
.
Also, I voted no. We don't need it. If you want it, classic is pretty close...
the annoying 2 different greens is the only thing that bothers me about the default.
It's the same colour.
Use a browser that isn't IE.
None.
You mean the option of using it, not forcing it back to that way right?
Stolen from Jamal, I wish we had our names like that still.
I wonder why I wasn't logged on that day o.0
Any of y'all remember the blue and white sen way back when?
None.
It's the same colour.
Use a browser that isn't IE.
No, it's not. 0c2a0c != 0b2a0b != 142e12. Marine2.png has some gamma in it or something or other which makes firefox think it should display 142e12 instead of 0b2a0b. IE displays it as 0b2a0b, as does opera, and chrome. Firefox and safari both display it as 142e12.
Original image
How it looks in firefox
How it should look.
Also, the green in the picture still doesn't match the green in the skin, even when rendered properly (0c2a0c vs 0b2a0b).
"Parliamentary inquiry, Mr. Chairman - do we have to call the Gentleman a gentleman if he's not one?"
I don't know why people are voting no, it's not like it is mandatory to use the classic skin.
None.
We can't explain the universe, just describe it; and we don't know whether our theories are true, we just know they're not wrong. >Harald Lesch
I don't know why people are voting no, it's not like it is mandatory to use the classic skin.
Because I
don't mind having it back, but it's not like I would
want it back.
V4's skin looks pretty backwards to me. And a skin won't make a fully functional website anyway...
But, boy did we have a lot more people back then.
None.
It's the same colour.
Use a browser that isn't IE.
No, it's not. 0c2a0c != 0b2a0b != 142e12. Marine2.png has some gamma in it or something or other which makes firefox think it should display 142e12 instead of 0b2a0b. IE displays it as 0b2a0b, as does opera, and chrome. Firefox and safari both display it as 142e12.
Original image
How it looks in firefox
How it should look.
Also, the green in the picture still doesn't match the green in the skin, even when rendered properly (0c2a0c vs 0b2a0b).
Looks fine in Firefox to me. I even zoomed in on it and couldn't notice any kind of a difference.
Screw the skin, bring back v4.
None.
Echo
Vrael -- It is, and I could definitely use a company with a commitment to flexibility, quality, and customer satisfaction to provide effective solutions to dampness and humidity in my urban environment.
