See my first response in this topic.
"I think, therefore I am."
You think, which I don't know, therefore I don't know you are.
I think, therefore I am, which does not contradict the possibility of me dreaming.
Is solipsism is flawed, or the "Life is a dream" prospect contradictory with it?
Oh yes, that's because life is real isn't it... and you might die.... funny...
"ono, he doesn't believe that some hypothetical possibility is actually true!"
What one believes has nothing to do with whether or not you can disprove what they're presenting.
So stfu with that argument.
BAM, BOOM, OCCAM'S RAZOR LIVES TO TELL ANOTHER TAIL OF SUCCESS!!
A decent response? Cheers for A_of-s_t!
However...
"In science, Occam’s razor is used as a heuristic (rule of thumb) to guide scientists in the development of theoretical models rather than as an arbiter between published models."
It doesn't disprove, it only says that something's not yet worth taking precedence over others.
So...
AFTER OCCAM'S RAZOR
until further evidence otherwise, for all practical intents and purposes I shall assume I just exist.
Which doesn't really provide anything in the way of a concrete, "Dream-reality idea is flawed because of ..."
First and foremost... Why the hell does it matter?
Why the hell does SEN mafia matter?
I don't see you complaining about that thread either.
None.