Maybe you guys should realize this is a rediculous question designed to make no sense, therefore it requires a rediculous answer, 11.
No, it's OVER NINE THOUSAAAAAAAAAND. Corbo said so himself.
ALL PRAISE YOUR SUPREME LORD CORBO
Maybe you guys should realize this is a rediculous question designed to make no sense, therefore it requires a rediculous answer, 11.
But seriously its some kind of reaction test to see if you try to figure it out, get angry, give up, be patient, etc... or what kind of crazy solutions you use to justify your answer. Case closed.
Maybe you guys should realize this is a rediculous grammar designed to make no sene, therefore it requires a rediculous quote, 9001.
fuck you all
I think this topic has been pretty entertaining. I just sat here and read the entire thing in 5 minutes. That's a good 5 minutes well spent I think.
I believe this whole thing was started to get us to do exactly what we just did. Freak out about it, and how it doesn't make sense.
None.
Just here for the activity... well not really
Maybe you guys should realize this is a rediculous question designed to make no sense, therefore it requires a rediculous answer, 11.
But seriously its some kind of reaction test to see if you try to figure it out, get angry, give up, be patient, etc... or what kind of crazy solutions you use to justify your answer. Case closed.
Maybe you guys should realize this is a rediculous grammar designed to make no sene, therefore it requires a rediculous quote, 9001.
So you're saying that "How many dots in a triangle?" is secretly wrong because it should be "How many dots ARE in a triangle?"
guy lifting weight (animated smiley):
O-IC
OI-C
"Oh, I see it"
ALL PRAISE YOUR SUPREME LORD CORBO
Ah, yes, now I get it
But you could just as easily say 6 then, depending on the API you're using. Interesting, explain?
fuck you all
Maybe you guys should realize this is a rediculous question designed to make no sense, therefore it requires a rediculous answer, 11.
But seriously its some kind of reaction test to see if you try to figure it out, get angry, give up, be patient, etc... or what kind of crazy solutions you use to justify your answer. Case closed.
Maybe you guys should realize this is a rediculous grammar designed to make no sene, therefore it requires a rediculous quote, 9001.
So you're saying that "How many dots in a triangle?" is secretly wrong because it should be "How many dots ARE in a triangle?"
I pointed that out to him, actually.
ALL PRAISE YOUR SUPREME LORD CORBO
Ah, yes, now I get it
But you could just as easily say 6 then, depending on the API you're using. Interesting, explain?
If you're not doing a vector-based shape drawing algorithm then you have to do 3 lines. But now that I think about it, anything these days should only need 4 points to make a triangle. It's still "3 points" if you can count a circular reference Actually vector based programs only need two points to create any polygon. Just a center point and a "radius" since they inscribe them in a circle
fuck you all
I'm pretty sure its an infinite amount of dots since lines are made up of an infinite amount of dots, there are three lines. Therefore, there are an infinite amount of dots.
Social Analysis
Not math. Stop trying to be smart and realize he's duping you.
None.
Social Analysis
Not math. Stop trying to be smart and realize he's duping you.
The whole experiment is null anyway because he has no control group and he is interfering with the experiment itself.
since lines are made up of [...] dots
What?
A line is an infinite amount of dots or points, a plane is an infinite amount of lines, and a cube (or any other 3D object) is made of an infinite amount of planes.
>.> Duh.
We can't explain the universe, just describe it; and we don't know whether our theories are true, we just know they're not wrong. >Harald Lesch
So are you going to tell us what your analysis was about exactly and what the results were?
And (if relevant) what the correct answer to the poll is - along with a brief explanation?
l
enter
click
click
click
c
enter
Dots are the clicks.
"Parliamentary inquiry, Mr. Chairman - do we have to call the Gentleman a gentleman if he's not one?"