[quote=Falkoner]OS Map 2 isn't VB, so you could use that once all the kinks are worked out.[/quote]Uh... Yes it is. lol, I didn't notice LW already responded to this. I'm not completley used to the layout. :P

Quote from Falkoner

OS Map 2 isn't VB, so you could use that once all the kinks are worked out.

Uh... Yes it is.

lol, I didn't notice LW already responded to this. I'm not completley used to the layout.

Cmon IP, that's just in serious discussion, where I'm turning into a running joke. Then how come it's so much faster than the old one? I thought you had changed codes...

Cmon IP, that's just in serious discussion, where I'm turning into a running joke.

Then how come it's so much faster than the old one? I thought you had changed codes...

I couldn't get winmpq or mpq2k running under wine. If you're going to do that IP you'll have to use a windows vps unfortunately. Rexy, mpq2k was command line and I found it to be much better than winmpq (winmpq is basically mpq2k with a gui).

I couldn't get winmpq or mpq2k running under wine. If you're going to do that IP you'll have to use a windows vps unfortunately.

Rexy, mpq2k was command line and I found it to be much better than winmpq (winmpq is basically mpq2k with a gui).

[quote=Falkoner]Then how come it's so much faster than the old one? I thought you had changed codes...[/quote] Even within VB you can improve your code.

Quote from Falkoner

Then how come it's so much faster than the old one? I thought you had changed codes...

Even within VB you can improve your code.

Yeah.... BY DELETING IT! haha

Yeah....




BY DELETING IT!

haha

[quote=spinesheath][quote=Falkoner]Then how come it's so much faster than the old one? I thought you had changed codes...[/quote] Even within VB you can improve your code.[/quote]1. It's not MUCH faster than the original. It just feels faster due to text output. 2. It deals with strings a lot smarter than it used to.

Quote from spinesheath

Quote from Falkoner

Then how come it's so much faster than the old one? I thought you had changed codes...

Even within VB you can improve your code.

1. It's not MUCH faster than the original. It just feels faster due to text output.
2. It deals with strings a lot smarter than it used to.

I have such code. One is C++ and Qt the other is C and WinAPI. It looks like your fine though.

I have such code. One is C++ and Qt the other is C and WinAPI.

It looks like your fine though.

I would love to see it as a reference :).

I would love to see it as a reference .

[quote=LegacyWeapon]1. It's not MUCH faster than the original. It just feels faster due to text output. 2. It deals with strings a lot smarter than it used to.[/quote] The original was in C++ though wasn't it? I wish I could help with this but I'm still too noob with C++ lol only thing I can do it open a file. Extracting all the information you need is beyond me :><:

Quote from LegacyWeapon

1. It's not MUCH faster than the original. It just feels faster due to text output.
2. It deals with strings a lot smarter than it used to.

The original was in C++ though wasn't it?

I wish I could help with this but I'm still too noob with C++ lol only thing I can do it open a file. Extracting all the information you need is beyond me

No... the original was also in VB. You can find the source at its official website.

No... the original was also in VB. You can find the source at its official website.

[quote=Yoshi da Sniper]I couldn't get winmpq or mpq2k running under wine. If you're going to do that IP you'll have to use a windows vps unfortunately. Rexy, mpq2k was command line and I found it to be much better than winmpq (winmpq is basically mpq2k with a gui).[/quote] Yes, it is faster, but I can't find the version that works by itself. :[ If you'd like to send it to me... :}

Quote from Yoshi da Sniper

I couldn't get winmpq or mpq2k running under wine. If you're going to do that IP you'll have to use a windows vps unfortunately.

Rexy, mpq2k was command line and I found it to be much better than winmpq (winmpq is basically mpq2k with a gui).

Yes, it is faster, but I can't find the version that works by itself. :[

If you'd like to send it to me...