Christian = Believers in Christ being the son of God, that's all there is to it.

Too bad that's not what Christianity is...
"Christianity (from the Greek word Xριστός, Khristos, "Christ", literally "anointed one") is a monotheistic religion[1] centered on the life and teachings of Jesus as presented in the New Testament"

Eh, I put it badly there, sorry about that.

Lets not worry about who is right or wrong and lets not call anyone cults
That video gives a really really really darn good perspective DANG!


< Mormon / LDS / Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints / I got more names if you really want

Rahaha! My vote has tipped the favor on the sides of atheism! We win.

I am Christian. And it made it 15:15 again.

I'm other. All religions/lack thereof suck, and I can easily make fun of pretty much any I want. I laugh at the Christians that think the Big Bang theory is invalid while their creation is precise. I suppose you could argue I'm agnostic, but that refers more to a branch of a particular belief. Also, it's a method of not choosing I find disturbing...

The Athiest group is suppose to be 16 but I voted other because I couldn't vote Buddhist and Atheist.

Agreed

You must really hate yourself if you make fun of yourself all the time. Your logic is EXTREMELY fallible, unless the argument you're trying to make is that everything sucks. You can believe in something, you can not believe in something, you can kind of believe in something but have disagreements with it, but by no means can you neither believe and not believe something AND have an opinion, which is what it sounds like you're trying to say you do.

WUT. You can't be everyman?!

You essentially said you don't subscribe to any theistic denomination, nor atheism. That puts you in agnostic land. Except, according to you, you're not. You find the "method of not choosing ... disturbing", but you do not choose.

You don't even have to analyze it that far. 'All religions/lack thereof suck' is enough to lay bare his contradiction.

That could imply agnosticism, which refutes atheism and theism on the basis that we can't know.

Have you considered that he's joking a bit?

You obviously don't know poison

You've vastly overestimated him.

Clearly, the fact that you are taking part in this discussion implies that Nora Roberts has given birth to a large seven winged flying pig. Also, all christians clearly are conspiring to steal all the cookies from the cookie jar, and aetheists will never share their extensive knowledge of how to build microscopic cans of chicken noodle soup, even if the agnostics were to bribe them with large rotating displays of fabulous colors and some ice cream. This state of events implies that the only true Buddha can be anyone not participating in this chat, and that subscribing to any particular denomination will devalue the total of your assets in gold, whether it be anything from aetheism to buddhism to christianity. Also, Jesus called and told me to tell you that he loves you.

These are hard facts, and cannot be disputed by a bunch of angsty teenagers posting on a starcraft website in a topic where the rules of life do not apply: so don't even try.

Well said, but what does this mean for those who do not have religion?

Also, will my pets be affected?

The value of their gold assets will remain slightly larger than those of other denominations.

Only the following pets will be affected by the implications presented above:
Cats, Orangutans, Goldfish larger than 6 inches long, Rodents (including Guinea Pigs and Squirrels), Tire Irons, Wombats, Octopie, Swedish Fish, Snakes, Bears, Telephone Poles, Furbies, Nano Pets, Giga Pets, Fempto Pets, and Hampsters.

Note: Rock pets will only suffer from approximately half as many of the effects of the above implications.
Note2: Dogs are too cool for you.

Agnostics are so damn good

That's not how it works. Mutual exclusion. You can't be both, sorry xp

Maybe it means you're agnostic, but if proof of God is shown you believe what Mormons do