|
Uh, I'm going to give the gods of balance a chance. If I don't like it, I won't play it. But from what I've seen, Blizzard never fucks up too big on balance.
EDIT: Chiu and Dethawk. You're both dumb. I am the superior. I understand that there are "DIFFERENT STROKES FOR DIFFERENT FOLKS". I don't play WC3, but I understand it is quite balanced (thus making it a good game in combination with its graphics and wide range of options in-game) and the professional scene is very similar to that of SC. I don't know anything about time wasting MMO's so I'm not going to bother talking about those. This post was edited 1 time, last edit by yenku: Nov 11 2007, 7:18 pm.
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() If you aren't outraged, you aren't paying attention.
"You can't tell me who I am cuz I'm working on that too. What's right for me just ain't right for you." Soldiers of Jah Army. |
|
NET WORTH
|
EDIT: Chiu and Dethawk. You're both dumb. I am the superior. I understand that there are "DIFFERENT STROKES FOR DIFFERENT FOLKS". I don't play WC3, but I understand it is quite balanced (thus making it a good game in combination with its graphics and wide range of options in-game) and the professional scene is very similar to that of SC. I don't know anything about time wasting MMO's so I'm not going to bother talking about those. Are you trying to say I don't understand why somebody couldn't like games such as WC3 and WoW? Because I can understand why they don't like the games, but to call them terrible? Perhaps my definition of terrible is different, but it sounds like is going farther than Chui.'s personal feelings towards the game. However, Chui has yet to actually make an argument why the games are "terrible".. so.. PS : It's Deathawk, with an A. <3 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
Overwin Winboat
|
I kind of agree with Deathawk on this one. I like WCIII. The graphics are a bit cartoony, but they're still enjoyable. The editor is great. There are many fantastic maps for it.
WoW? It may not be the best MMORPG, but its not terrible (though blizzard does screw up on balance on this one). Decent graphics, some fun quests... and a larger playerbase then just about anything else. |
|
He'll spear your brains if you step out of line.
|
Chui: You never really made an argument. Please go find it and post it if you don't want to look like an idiot. Just to counter a few....
Did you not even read my post? Make sure your eyes and brains work TOGETHER this time. See now? No, I said everything Blizzard makes is gold, as in, makes them lots of money. Furthermore, you seem to think that everything YOU think is lame is lame in the absolute. It is not so. Knowledge is the intersection of truth and belief. You have one (give you a hint, it's belief). In order to know a game is lame, you must also intake facts, in addition to your opinion. One good way of doing this is seeing what everyone else thinks. In the case of a game, if millions of people pay monthly for it, it can't be all that bad. Point: You can't go around saying everything you don't like sucks. Well, you can I guess, you just sound like a closed minded ignorant/arrogant idiot baby. Whao, that's a little flamy. Meh. Edit: Pay attention to that first part of my post, that's what I really wanted. ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() [quote=Felagund]The most dangerous weapon anyone can wield is self righteousness.[/quote]
I have a signature yay! |
|
Overwin Winboat
|
I saw a few instances of it. However, this is not the focus of the topic, so lets get back on topic, folks -
When you think about it, SC was also basically Rock/Paper/Scissors - High Templar or Lurkers take out squadrons of marine-class ground units or hydralisks, some armors are more susceptible to different attacks... Devourers were anti-air, Guardians were anti-ground, and you needed a combination of units to be any good. I really don't see how SCII is different. |