Let me spell it out.
When you decide that the first thing you want to do is get 225 minerals for a war factory, You've also decided that you will also basically be at lv1 until you reach it. you aren't going to be in the way of the enemy who actually upgraded.
7 is a gross exaggeration. Try 0. You can burst into their base with a teammate focusing with you on the weak pylon(-3 cannons). If the 1 cannon firing at your ranged hero is really bothering you, you can always just take that pylon out too.
As of right now reavers are only useful at ending the game for a team already in the lead.
Question: Was cannon damage reduced to 50 in 1.4MT when broods were put back to 50?
'Kay, you've obviously never played vs reavers, so stop talking about them? 200 minerals is a fucking cake-walk to get quickly.
Oh, and by the time you kill that pylon that's hosting 3 cannons of death, 2 reavers'll have spawned. Or...better yet, I'll have created another pylon for 15minerals. ZOMG!
Marine's upgrade will be +2. I'd have no problem with HP going back up after that.
Anyway, I see people (well, dR.uNKen, anyway) picking a fast class, running in a lane, getting spawns from that spawn to chase, then running to another lane to take XP from multiple paths. It's kinda lame and IMO something should be done about that.
HPAttack rines are easy enough to kill, you want to drop them to +2? ...=/ If anything keep it's +3, and lower it's heatlh to like 3500~, Beef up it's first spell by a fourth mine, make the last spell summon two mines per interval, and re-do it's L2, give ghosts more damage.
Or you could like make the SCV have a timer, when the timer hits 0, the SCV poofs. Just give it some variance for bunkers. Make it have a valid spell side path, instead of just bruting everything. But this is irrelevant, cause the only things that really need balancing are Assault, Medic, and Archer. They're all quite weak.
Assault is 'assault' and yet it gets raped by anything large.
Medic, well it's ok for 3:3, but it's 100% useless in 2:2.
Archer, well, my thoughts on archer have already been expressed. Lul. 'Anyone with an ounce of micro' > Archer.
Post has been edited 1 time(s), last time on Dec 23 2008, 7:44 am by SFSKabam.
None.