Site Forums Starcraft I Files Starcraft II Files Wiki
Staredit Network > Forums > Serious Discussion > Topic: Protected or Unprotected?
Protected or Unprotected?
Aug 18 2008, 5:01 am
By: A_of-s_t
Pages: < 1 2 3 4 … 5 >
 
Polls
Protected Or Unprotected
Protected Or Unprotected
Answer Votes Percentage % Voters
Should be able to use protection 30
 
86%
None.
Should NOT be able to use protection 5
 
15%
None.
Please login to vote.
Poll has 35 votes. You can vote for at most 1 option(s).

Aug 21 2008, 3:06 pm BiOAtK Post #21



I don't understand anti-protection people, and I have lived with them (my parents) my whole life.
You should be allowed to have sex anyway (that's not rape and things like it) you want, you can't trust a decision made 2000 years ago to be any good at all in modern times.

There's something called free will, and no, God cannot give us free will if he knows the future. It's not free then.



None.

Aug 21 2008, 3:13 pm MillenniumArmy Post #22



I highly doubt this should be an issue for us to be talking about because I'm pretty sure none of you guys are going to get any action no matter how hard you try.


no but seriously, I don't seem to see what's wrong with protection. Pretty much the only major group that seems to be against the use of protection are Catholics.



None.

Aug 21 2008, 5:38 pm Demented Shaman Post #23



Quote from MillenniumArmy
no but seriously, I don't seem to see what's wrong with protection. Pretty much the only major group that seems to be against the use of protection are Catholics.
Don't forget Mormons. :rolleyes:



None.

Aug 21 2008, 7:33 pm Brontobyte Post #24



Quote from MillenniumArmy
I highly doubt this should be an issue for us to be talking about because I'm pretty sure none of you guys are going to get any action no matter how hard you try.


no but seriously, I don't seem to see what's wrong with protection. Pretty much the only major group that seems to be against the use of protection are Catholics.


Religion fucks up everything. If someone wants to use protection, let them. If they want to enjoy sex with there partner and choose not to use a form of contraception, let them.

Religion + (INSERT TEXT HERE) = SCREWED UP!



None.

Aug 21 2008, 7:43 pm BiOAtK Post #25



'Cept Buddhism. :D



None.

Aug 21 2008, 10:36 pm rockz Post #26

ᴄʜᴇᴇsᴇ ɪᴛ!

Davidism too.



"Parliamentary inquiry, Mr. Chairman - do we have to call the Gentleman a gentleman if he's not one?"

Aug 21 2008, 11:43 pm Falkoner Post #27



Quote
Don't forget Mormons. :rolleyes:

Quote
Yes, but sex should only be done between married couples, protection is when they want to enjoy each other, but not have a kid, it's not for teens and unmarried people to have sex with no consequences.

Did I say no?



None.

Aug 22 2008, 2:24 am Demented Shaman Post #28



Quote from Falkoner
Quote
Don't forget Mormons. :rolleyes:

Quote
Yes, but sex should only be done between married couples, protection is when they want to enjoy each other, but not have a kid, it's not for teens and unmarried people to have sex with no consequences.

Did I say no?
Quote from Falkoner
Yes, but sex should only be done between married couples, protection is when they want to enjoy each other, but not have a kid, it's not for teens and unmarried people to have sex with no consequences.




None.

Aug 22 2008, 2:50 am Kaias Post #29



Quote from name:Donkey Punch
Quote from Falkoner
Quote
Don't forget Mormons. :rolleyes:

Quote
Yes, but sex should only be done between married couples, protection is when they want to enjoy each other, but not have a kid, it's not for teens and unmarried people to have sex with no consequences.

Did I say no?
Quote from Falkoner
Yes, but sex should only be done between married couples, protection is when they want to enjoy each other, but not have a kid, it's not for teens and unmarried people to have sex with no consequences.
= Alright but shouldn't be doing before marriage anyway.

Besides the point though. If they were not allowed it would deter some adolescents but not near all. People really invested are going to anyway, may as well allow them a better chance and not spreading STDs if they are going to.



None.

Aug 22 2008, 3:49 am Demented Shaman Post #30



Quote from Kaias
Quote from name:Donkey Punch
Quote from Falkoner
Quote
Don't forget Mormons. :rolleyes:

Quote
Yes, but sex should only be done between married couples, protection is when they want to enjoy each other, but not have a kid, it's not for teens and unmarried people to have sex with no consequences.

Did I say no?
Quote from Falkoner
Yes, but sex should only be done between married couples, protection is when they want to enjoy each other, but not have a kid, it's not for teens and unmarried people to have sex with no consequences.
= Alright but shouldn't be doing before marriage anyway.

Besides the point though. If they were not allowed it would deter some adolescents but not near all. People really invested are going to anyway, may as well allow them a better chance and not spreading STDs if they are going to.

Quote from Falkoner
Yes, but sex should only be done between married couples, protection is when they want to enjoy each other, but not have a kid, it's not for teens and unmarried people to have sex with no consequences.




None.

Aug 22 2008, 4:11 am Falkoner Post #31



That doesn't make me anti-protection, it makes me pro abstinence.



None.

Aug 22 2008, 4:16 am Demented Shaman Post #32



Quote from Falkoner
That doesn't make me anti-protection, it makes me pro abstinence.
I don't care what you call it. Let's remember what the original post was that I was responding to.

Quote from MillenniumArmy
Pretty much the only major group that seems to be against the use of protection are Catholics.

Quote from Falkoner
Yes, but sex should only be done between married couples, protection is when they want to enjoy each other, but not have a kid, it's not for teens and unmarried people to have sex with no consequences.
SEEMS LIKE AGAINST THE USE OF PROTECTION TO ME. :whistling1:



None.

Aug 22 2008, 4:23 am Falkoner Post #33



Not against the use of protection:
Quote
protection is when they want to enjoy each other, but not have a kid

Only against sex between unmarried people.



None.

Aug 22 2008, 4:36 am WoAHorde Post #34



Quote from Falkoner
Not against the use of protection:
Quote
protection is when they want to enjoy each other, but not have a kid

Only against sex between unmarried people.

May I ask why? Walking into a marriage with no experience is going to fuck you over if you don't have any clue to what you are doing.



None.

Aug 22 2008, 4:39 am Falkoner Post #35



Quote
Walking into a marriage with no experience is going to fuck you over if you don't have any clue to what you are doing.

Having sex doesn't require experience to do it properly, it's not that difficult of a process.



None.

Aug 22 2008, 4:45 am Demented Shaman Post #36



Quote from Falkoner
Not against the use of protection:
Quote
protection is when they want to enjoy each other, but not have a kid

Only against sex between unmarried people.
Nice you even misquote yourself. :lol:

Quote
protection is when they want to enjoy each other, but not have a kid, it's not for teens and unmarried people to have sex with no consequences.




None.

Aug 22 2008, 4:49 am Falkoner Post #37



It's not a misquote, I am not against protection, only against unmarried people having sex, which protection often encourages.



None.

Aug 22 2008, 5:16 am DT_Battlekruser Post #38



Quote
May I ask why? Walking into a marriage with no experience is going to fuck you over if you don't have any clue to what you are doing.

Never a truer word said, if you stopped focusing on sex and abstracted that for a minute.

But seeing as I'm here to state an opinion in this thread, being against contraceptives is just stupid. It's people's right to use them if they want to, and whatever you feel morally about premarital, underage, or other kinds of sex, as long as it's consensual it shouldn't be everyone else's business to try to prohibit it. Personally, though, I don't look down on premarital sex so much as people who brag about it and try to use their sexual "experience" to belittle others.



None.

Aug 22 2008, 5:52 am Moose Post #39

We live in a society.

Quote from Falkoner
Yes, but sex should only be done between married couples, protection is when they want to enjoy each other, but not have a kid, it's not for teens and unmarried people to have sex with no consequences.
What about married teenagers?

Also, the comments about one could think this topic is about mapping protection got old fast. They are off-topic and such comments do not belong in Serious Discussion. For those who like to remain informed, several such posts have been deleted and they will continue to be deleted.



https://www.collaborativefund.com/blog/how-this-all-happened/
https://thelastpsychiatrist.com/2012/11/hipsters_on_food_stamps.html
https://youtu.be/vyiXaCRwZTs
https://thelastpsychiatrist.com/2011/09/how_to_be_mean_to_your_kids.html
http://lab.cccb.org/en/renata-avila-the-internet-of-creation-disappeared-now-we-have-the-internet-of-surveillance-and-control/

Aug 22 2008, 5:58 am Falkoner Post #40



Quote
What about married teenagers?

As long as they're lawfully married, although most cases of married teens is only because they had sex and accidentally got the girl pregnant.



None.

Options
Pages: < 1 2 3 4 … 5 >
  Back to forum
Please log in to reply to this topic or to report it.
Members in this topic: None.
Global Shoutbox
[09:38 pm]
NudeRaider -- Ultraviolet
Ultraviolet shouted: NudeRaider sing it brother
 trust me, you don't wanna hear that. I defer that to the pros.
[2024-4-27. : 7:56 pm]
Ultraviolet -- NudeRaider
NudeRaider shouted: "War nie wirklich weg" 🎵
 sing it brother
[2024-4-27. : 6:24 pm]
NudeRaider -- "War nie wirklich weg" 🎵
[2024-4-27. : 3:33 pm]
O)FaRTy1billion[MM] -- o sen is back
[2024-4-27. : 1:53 am]
Ultraviolet -- :lol:
[2024-4-26. : 6:51 pm]
Vrael -- It is, and I could definitely use a company with a commitment to flexibility, quality, and customer satisfaction to provide effective solutions to dampness and humidity in my urban environment.
[2024-4-26. : 6:50 pm]
NudeRaider -- Vrael
Vrael shouted: Idk, I was looking more for a dehumidifer company which maybe stands out as a beacon of relief amidst damp and unpredictable climates of bustling metropolises. Not sure Amazon qualifies
 sounds like moisture control is often a pressing concern in your city
[2024-4-26. : 6:50 pm]
Vrael -- Maybe here on the StarEdit Network I could look through the Forums for some Introductions to people who care about the Topics of Dehumidifiers and Carpet Cleaning?
[2024-4-26. : 6:49 pm]
Vrael -- Perhaps even here I on the StarEdit Network I could look for some Introductions.
[2024-4-26. : 6:48 pm]
Vrael -- On this Topic, I could definitely use some Introductions.
Please log in to shout.
©2003-2024 Staredit Network.
Starcraft & Starcraft II are trademarks of Blizzard Entertainment.
Site Index | Terms of Service | Privacy Policy | Contributions


Members Online: Roy