None.
Diminishing Returns
Polls
Should I implement diminishing returns for rewards in a team shared kills map?
Should I implement diminishing returns for rewards in a team shared kills map?
| Answer | Votes | Percentage | % | Voters |
| Yes | 8 | 100% |
None.
|
|
| No | 0 | 0% |
None.
|
Poll has 8 votes. You can vote for at most 1 option(s).
Discuss.
What's that? 
None.
Care to explain? 
None.
Diminishing returns = you get less reward per kill/kills
Rewards = benefits making you stronger
Team shared kills = you and your team share kills
What more do you need?
Oh right, the monsters you fight get stronger as well.
Rewards = benefits making you stronger
Team shared kills = you and your team share kills
What more do you need?
Oh right, the monsters you fight get stronger as well.
None.
Quote from LegacyWeapon
Diminishing returns = you get less reward per kill/kills
Rewards = benefits making you stronger
Team shared kills = you and your team share kills
What more do you need?
Rewards = benefits making you stronger
Team shared kills = you and your team share kills
What more do you need?
This would be good is the other player/team was owing the other team, to help balance the game for noobs.
None.
Quote from 
Brontobyte
BrontobyteQuote from LegacyWeapon
Diminishing returns = you get less reward per kill/kills
Rewards = benefits making you stronger
Team shared kills = you and your team share kills
What more do you need?
Rewards = benefits making you stronger
Team shared kills = you and your team share kills
What more do you need?
This would be good is the other player/team was owing the other team, to help balance the game for noobs.
Most defenses have diminishing returns in the form of upgrades.
None.
ᴄʜᴇᴇsᴇ ɪᴛ!
About to say: wrong forum. But then I reread the forum title. Yes, diminishing returns is a good thing.
"Parliamentary inquiry, Mr. Chairman - do we have to call the Gentleman a gentleman if he's not one?"
We can't explain the universe, just describe it; and we don't know whether our theories are true, we just know they're not wrong. >Harald Lesch
Quote from name:
Yes, diminishing returns is a good thing.
Without diminishing returns it would only pull you back farther and farther once you get a small disadvantage.
I guess this is what roughly what Bronto meant but my point is that I think it doesn't only apply for noobs.
Post has been edited 1 time(s), last time on Aug 9 2008, 7:46 pm by NudeRaider.
Yeah, that's the best thing for maps like RPGs and such, esoecially competetive ones, since it makes sure no player gets way ahead and completely beats out the others. Of course, I donno how it will work with shared kills...
None.
I've changed the system to split kills. For example, if you have a team of 3 and one player has three kills, the system recognizes this as each player having one kill.
Options
Pages: 1
Back to forum
Please log in to reply to this topic or to report it.
Members in this topic: None.
[2024-5-06. : 5:02 am]
Oh_Man -- because it adds anotherr level of player decision-making where u dont wanna walk too far away from the medic or u lose healing value[2024-5-06. : 5:01 am]
Oh_Man -- initially I thought it was weird why is he still using the basic pre-EUD medic healing system, but it's actually genius[2024-5-06. : 3:04 am]
Ultraviolet -- VraelVrael shouted: I almost had a heart attack just thinking about calculating all the offsets it would take to do that kind of stuff
With the modern EUD editors, I don't think they're calculating nearly as many offsets as you might imagine. Still some fancy ass work that I'm sure took a ton of effort[2024-5-05. : 9:35 pm]
Vrael -- I almost had a heart attack just thinking about calculating all the offsets it would take to do that kind of stuff
Members Online: Ultraviolet, 
O)FaRTy1billion[MM], Roy, Excalibur
Ultraviolet, O)FaRTy1billion[MM], Roy, Excalibur