Staredit Network > Forums > Serious Discussion > Topic: Scopes Trial
Scopes Trial
This topic is locked. You can no longer write replies here.
Mar 28 2008, 4:11 am
By: Brontobyte
Pages: < 1 « 7 8 9 10 1112 >
 

Mar 30 2008, 6:31 pm Forsaken Archer Post #161



Quote
Infinity is never a number, not even in an infinite timeline.
So there is no point A yet somehow we got to point B?



None.

Mar 30 2008, 6:33 pm Demented Shaman Post #162



Quote from isolatedpurity
Quote
Infinity is never a number, not even in an infinite timeline.
So there is no point A yet somehow we got to point B?
Yes



None.

Mar 30 2008, 6:34 pm Forsaken Archer Post #163



That is illogical.



None.

Mar 30 2008, 6:37 pm Demented Shaman Post #164



Quote from isolatedpurity
That is illogical.
You get to point B from a point preceeding it. There is a point A, but it is not infinity.



None.

Mar 30 2008, 6:49 pm Forsaken Archer Post #165



Then define it. Without relativity to point B.



None.

Mar 30 2008, 6:51 pm Demented Shaman Post #166



Quote from isolatedpurity
Then define it. Without relativity to point B.
Define point B first.

You're just proving that in an infinite timeline things are only relative, which is what I said before.



None.

Mar 30 2008, 7:13 pm Syphon Post #167



Quote from isolatedpurity
Then define it. Without relativity to point B.

If there's no point B to be relative to, then point A is the present, making it, relatively, 0. So you don't need to define it relative to anything but itself. ;o

Imagine a Cartesian plane, x,y. On this plane there is a line of the form y = 0. The point (0,0) is the present, and any time, future or past can be defined relative to this point.

This point ALWAYS exists. And although you can define ANY point of the "time"line relative to (0,0), you cannot define them all, or the beginning of time (x = -∞), because time extends infinitely in both directions, and ∞ does not have an absolute value.

I really hope I won't have to draw a picture.



None.

Mar 30 2008, 7:16 pm Dapperdan Post #168



Quote from isolatedpurity
Blah. You are all missing the point entirely. Or dividing the point in pieces to divide and conquer the idea.

Or maybe, just maybe, you're just wrong, and shouldn't blame your failure to create logical arguments and analogies on everyone who happens to disagree with you?



None.

Mar 30 2008, 7:17 pm Forsaken Archer Post #169



Point B is now, or your 0,0. I want a point A.

Quote
Or maybe you're just wrong and shouldn't blame your failure to create logical arguments and analogies on everyone who happens to disagree with you?
No, that can't be it :) :lol: :)



None.

Mar 30 2008, 7:22 pm Syphon Post #170



Point A is a specific number before Point B, with a still infinite amount of points behind it.

Your logic is full of fail IP.



None.

Mar 30 2008, 7:31 pm Forsaken Archer Post #171



Fine :unsure:

Prove it.



None.

Mar 30 2008, 7:34 pm Brontobyte Post #172



Quote
Fine

Prove it.

Heres the best way to define infinity,

Place two points exactly one foot away from each other. Then divide the points distance by two. Keep repeating this untill they touch, oh yeah, they wont. :D Even if you see that they are touching, they really aren't. If you can understand this simple concept, you have got it.



None.

Mar 30 2008, 7:37 pm Demented Shaman Post #173



Quote from Brontobyte
Quote
Fine

Prove it.

Heres the best way to define infinity,

Place two points exactly one foot away from each other. Then divide the points distance by two. Keep repeating this untill they touch, oh yeah, they wont. :D Even if you see that they are touching, they really aren't. If you can understand this simple concept, you have got it.
Quote
cheeze477 (3:34:19 PM): http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Orders_of_magnitude_%28length%29
cheeze477 (3:34:28 PM): Planck length; size of a string; lengths smaller than this do not make any physical sense, according to current theories of physics
cheeze477 (3:34:36 PM): in case you guys didn't know
Of course only in terms of real life.



None.

Mar 30 2008, 7:37 pm cheeze Post #174



nvm



None.

Mar 30 2008, 7:37 pm Forsaken Archer Post #175



No, physically show me point A.
(this is me basically giving up -- I know you can't -- which is why an infinite time line is just a theory, just as a finite one is)



None.

Mar 30 2008, 7:38 pm Brontobyte Post #176



Quote from devilesk
Quote from Brontobyte
Quote
Fine

Prove it.

Heres the best way to define infinity,

Place two points exactly one foot away from each other. Then divide the points distance by two. Keep repeating this untill they touch, oh yeah, they wont. :D Even if you see that they are touching, they really aren't. If you can understand this simple concept, you have got it.
Quote
cheeze477 (3:34:19 PM): http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Orders_of_magnitude_%28length%29
cheeze477 (3:34:28 PM): Planck length; size of a string; lengths smaller than this do not make any physical sense, according to current theories of physics
cheeze477 (3:34:36 PM): in case you guys didn't know
Of course only in terms of real life.

Its the same concept of what infinity is.



None.

Mar 30 2008, 7:42 pm Brontobyte Post #177



Quote from isolatedpurity
No, physically show me point A.
(this is me basically giving up -- I know you can't -- which is why an infinite time line is just a theory, just as a finite one is)


A----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------B

Ok take a ruler and divide the distance of this ray by 2. They will never thouch. The number will just become really long, after the decimal point.

Another example:

Open your computers calculator function. Input the number 1. Then divide this number by 2. Repeat this for about ~100 times. The number will be something with a (number/decimal) x 10^-23948502 Your calculator will just give up on you after awhile.

Yet another example:

Google how long Pi is. It goes about ~1 billion something numbers after the decimal point. Their is no end because the number is irrational.



None.

Mar 30 2008, 7:44 pm cheeze Post #178



Do you know how a computer works? They have limited memory. The computer can only use 32 bits (unless you have 64 bit machine) to represent a number.



None.

Mar 30 2008, 7:46 pm Syphon Post #179



Quote from isolatedpurity
No, physically show me point A.
(this is me basically giving up -- I know you can't -- which is why an infinite time line is just a theory, just as a finite one is)



THERE IT IS!1

Don't edit my posts, Merrell.

Post has been edited 2 time(s), last time on Mar 30 2008, 9:20 pm by Syphon.



None.

Mar 30 2008, 7:52 pm cheeze Post #180



That's a float. That has even less representation than an integer, unless you're using a super computer, which is how pi is usually calculated to that far.

..What's the point of this?



None.

Options
Pages: < 1 « 7 8 9 10 1112 >
  Back to forum
Please log in to reply to this topic or to report it.
Members in this topic: None.
[09:38 pm]
NudeRaider -- Ultraviolet
Ultraviolet shouted: NudeRaider sing it brother
trust me, you don't wanna hear that. I defer that to the pros.
[07:56 pm]
Ultraviolet -- NudeRaider
NudeRaider shouted: "War nie wirklich weg" 🎵
sing it brother
[06:24 pm]
NudeRaider -- "War nie wirklich weg" 🎵
[03:33 pm]
O)FaRTy1billion[MM] -- o sen is back
[01:53 am]
Ultraviolet -- :lol:
[2024-4-26. : 6:51 pm]
Vrael -- It is, and I could definitely use a company with a commitment to flexibility, quality, and customer satisfaction to provide effective solutions to dampness and humidity in my urban environment.
[2024-4-26. : 6:50 pm]
NudeRaider -- Vrael
Vrael shouted: Idk, I was looking more for a dehumidifer company which maybe stands out as a beacon of relief amidst damp and unpredictable climates of bustling metropolises. Not sure Amazon qualifies
sounds like moisture control is often a pressing concern in your city
[2024-4-26. : 6:50 pm]
Vrael -- Maybe here on the StarEdit Network I could look through the Forums for some Introductions to people who care about the Topics of Dehumidifiers and Carpet Cleaning?
[2024-4-26. : 6:49 pm]
Vrael -- Perhaps even here I on the StarEdit Network I could look for some Introductions.
[2024-4-26. : 6:48 pm]
Vrael -- On this Topic, I could definitely use some Introductions.
Please log in to shout.


Members Online: Roy