Staredit Network > Forums > GalaxyWiki Project > Topic: Your articles
Your articles
Aug 24 2010, 11:24 pm
By: payne
Pages: < 1 « 2 3 4 5 6 >
 

Nov 9 2010, 12:30 am payne Post #61

:payne:

How much were we getting paid per wiki? 20 minerals?



None.

Nov 9 2010, 12:31 am DevliN Post #62

OVERWATCH STATUS GO

10, unless they were stellar. I'm giving 20+ mainly to the http://www.staredit.net/topic/12553/ articles.



\:devlin\: Currently Working On: \:devlin\:
My Overwatch addiction.

Nov 9 2010, 12:34 am payne Post #63

:payne:

Quote from DevliN
10, unless they were stellar. I'm giving 20+ mainly to the http://www.staredit.net/topic/12553/ articles.
You hax. What have you done for people that have produced only 1 wiki? Minimal amount of minerals sent via SEN is of 20. :P



None.

Nov 9 2010, 12:35 am DevliN Post #64

OVERWATCH STATUS GO

I didn't give people my minerals. I sent minerals via SEN's reward contribution system. http://www.staredit.net/?p=store&area=logs



\:devlin\: Currently Working On: \:devlin\:
My Overwatch addiction.

Nov 9 2010, 10:12 pm payne Post #65

:payne:

To help you out, I'll start a second encase box for newly created wikis. ^^



None.

Nov 10 2010, 2:59 pm Devourer Post #66

Hello

Improved the libraries.
http://www.staredit.net/starcraft2/Trigger_Libraries



Please report errors in the Staredit.Network forum.

Nov 10 2010, 4:30 pm payne Post #67

:payne:

Talking of it, anyone has Libraries to list?



None.

Nov 12 2010, 3:57 am payne Post #68

:payne:

http://www.staredit.net/starcraft2/Required/Unfinished_Wikis

It should be much easier to know what's required from now on. :)



None.

Nov 12 2010, 6:42 am DevliN Post #69

OVERWATCH STATUS GO

That requires that page to be updated constantly. It would be easier to just use http://www.staredit.net/starcraft2/Special:WantedPages and/or http://www.staredit.net/starcraft2/Category:Stubs

EDIT1:
Also, finished http://www.staredit.net/starcraft2/Attaching_a_Model_to_a_Unit with the Data Editor version.

EDIT2:
And I made an article for http://www.staredit.net/starcraft2/Host_Site_Operations since we didn't already have one. I'll fill in the ones I know off the top of my head, and do some research for others as well.

Post has been edited 2 time(s), last time on Nov 12 2010, 8:08 am by DevliN.



\:devlin\: Currently Working On: \:devlin\:
My Overwatch addiction.

Nov 12 2010, 8:03 pm payne Post #70

:payne:

Quote from DevliN
That requires that page to be updated constantly. It would be easier to just use http://www.staredit.net/starcraft2/Special:WantedPages and/or http://www.staredit.net/starcraft2/Category:Stubs
I find it much better than WantedPages and Stubs. It is all organized and nice. It gives details as of what needs to be changed as well.
Moreover, WantedPages is just a mess... in the beginning stage the of wiki, everyone would "ask" for ridiculous things. :/

And no worry, I had in mind to keep it updated. ;)



None.

Nov 12 2010, 8:06 pm DevliN Post #71

OVERWATCH STATUS GO

I don't see how WantedPages isn't organized, though. We do need articles for at least 15 of the top 20 listed. And "Stubs" is supposed to be used for what you're trying to accomplish with the "Unfinished Wikis" page, that's how wikis work. So I think it would be easier to just add [[Category:Stub]] to articles that need to be finished or expanded.



\:devlin\: Currently Working On: \:devlin\:
My Overwatch addiction.

Nov 12 2010, 10:09 pm Jack Post #72

>be faceless void >mfw I have no face

I gotta agree with devlin, clever people designed wikis and stubs and WantedPages to fill the hole, no point digging a second hole next to it just so you can fill it again. As it were.



Red classic.

"In short, their absurdities are so extreme that it is painful even to quote them."

Nov 12 2010, 10:19 pm DevliN Post #73

OVERWATCH STATUS GO

I finished the (Attachment) portion of http://www.staredit.net/starcraft2/Host_Site_Operations as best I could, after testing each value on a few units. If anyone has any more info on the operations in red, feel free to edit them. Ultimately I may make a page for each unit in the game and show the effects of each "SOpAttachWeaponXX" value on them. That will be extremely time consuming, so that's a project I'll take on down the line.

EDIT:
I'm going to be redoing my Game Variants article soon, but in the meantime I started http://www.staredit.net/starcraft2/Game_Attributes as well. Whatever I don't finish on it in the next 20 minutes I'll finish tonight after I run some errands. Please don't touch that one until I'm done, everyone. :D

Post has been edited 1 time(s), last time on Nov 13 2010, 12:19 am by DevliN.



\:devlin\: Currently Working On: \:devlin\:
My Overwatch addiction.

Nov 13 2010, 2:36 am Jack Post #74

>be faceless void >mfw I have no face

Done this, needs a bit more polishing and all the linked filetypes need to be done http://www.staredit.net/starcraft2/Filetypes

And these need deleting. http://www.staredit.net/starcraft2/DDS http://www.staredit.net/starcraft2/DDS_(Filetype) http://www.staredit.net/starcraft2/MPQ_(Format)



Red classic.

"In short, their absurdities are so extreme that it is painful even to quote them."

Nov 13 2010, 6:34 am DevliN Post #75

OVERWATCH STATUS GO

I deleted 'em for ya.

Thanks to discussion on the Host Site Operations article, I'm questioning the importance of the article. In all honestly, I wanted to make it to explain what all the SOp things were (not just attachments), but I feel like it might not be worthwhile now. Oh well.

Also, I'm resuming work on the Game Attributes page. It's funny that when I started this I thought they did one thing, and now as I'm going back and looking at them again I see that they do something completely different. Go me. :><:



\:devlin\: Currently Working On: \:devlin\:
My Overwatch addiction.

Nov 13 2010, 6:45 am aalleecc248 Post #76



I did this, as payne had requested: http://www.staredit.net/starcraft2/UI_Frames

Showing the close measurements of the UI Frames.



None.

Nov 13 2010, 7:02 am DevliN Post #77

OVERWATCH STATUS GO

Contrary to the note on there, I don't think the resolution affects custom dialogs. I tested the map on my 1920x1080 and my 1440x900 monitors, and it looked the same on both.



\:devlin\: Currently Working On: \:devlin\:
My Overwatch addiction.

Nov 13 2010, 8:11 am payne Post #78

:payne:

Quote from DevliN
Contrary to the note on there, I don't think the resolution affects custom dialogs. I tested the map on my 1920x1080 and my 1440x900 monitors, and it looked the same on both.
The "Unit Information" relative to Bottom has to be changing, imo. :O

Anyways, I've done some work on the Custom UI wiki: http://www.staredit.net/starcraft2/Custom_UI



None.

Nov 13 2010, 8:17 am DevliN Post #79

OVERWATCH STATUS GO

I see "Custom UIs" as being custom user interfaces, like what you would see in OneTwo's WoW SC2 map. I think the article should be more about creating something like that rather than placing some dialog boxes for a store.

Or hell, if someone can make a tutorial on how to make the hero choosing interface on Blizzard DotA, that would be great:




\:devlin\: Currently Working On: \:devlin\:
My Overwatch addiction.

Nov 13 2010, 8:22 am payne Post #80

:payne:

I'm pretty sure you guys will be against that, but ProGammer did allow us to use all of his material in exchange of due credits.
-> http://forums.sc2mapster.com/resources/project-workplace/14010-blizz-dota-hero-selection-interface/#p1



None.

Options
Pages: < 1 « 2 3 4 5 6 >
  Back to forum
Please log in to reply to this topic or to report it.
Members in this topic: None.
[04:05 am]
O)FaRTy1billion[MM] -- the setting exists, it's just hidden in a weird place
[04:04 am]
O)FaRTy1billion[MM] -- instead change "Microtile Overlay" to "Impassable"
[04:04 am]
O)FaRTy1billion[MM] -- er, wait, idk why i was looking for height
[04:03 am]
O)FaRTy1billion[MM] -- below the minimap should be a thing that says "Overlay Settings" with a little + button in the corner, press the + to expand it, uncheck Use Defaults, then change "Tile Overlay" to "Height"
[03:57 am]
Sylph-Of-Space -- Unless I'm dum (possible)
[03:57 am]
Sylph-Of-Space -- It would be so so so nice if SCMDraft had some kind of dedicated "walkability" view for the tilesets.
[03:53 am]
Sylph-Of-Space -- :'( dont cry for me cat-gentina
[09:18 pm]
Ultraviolet -- 🔪🐈
[12:34 pm]
NudeRaider -- curiosity kills the cat!
[2024-5-19. : 6:18 am]
Sylph-Of-Space -- No complaints here, i'm just curious!
Please log in to shout.


Members Online: nagayecx28