He hasn't done anything worthy of a ban. I really can't blame him. Back in the day when I was way into sc and my b.net stopped working, I was just as frustrated and just as desperite to get it working again. The diversity topic is a little out there, but it's about starcraft, so w/e.

I don't really like him... I probably should take back my vote cause I said yes. But I change my mind, he shouldn't be banned. He seems to spam a lot, and just post irrelevant and completely random things... But that doesn't mean he should be banned.

Most of you obviously weren't around for YaeXirillion.

I was around. Hell, I still know what he looks like.

My! How ironic is this! Me in a thread that's intent on banning me?! And apparently I'm the minority?! How intriguing! However, I'd also wish to state some things that piss me off. And now, it's not the fact that some wish me banned, because obviously everyone is entitled to their opinion. But, it's also the fact on how you can simply say I am something, and apparently I am that. I'm not a furry, what I am though is sort of like a puppeteer. A little lesson. Obviously when anyone is online, they act on their alter ego, someone they really aren't in real life. No matter how hard you try, you'll still probably act differently online then you do in real life. Instead of me being just one personality, I prefer having numerous.

I can be ridiculously cheerful, which often times blinds people into thinking I'm ignorant.
However I can probably throw nearly epic tantrums.
And, I suppose it can be argued I'm a whore for profession when I wish to be.

With this little bit of information, I also wish to notify to ClansAreForGays that you missed my reviews. Don't they all seem bitchy? And they've all been written on good days. Well, that's yet another ego! (And no, my bitchery in them isn't to be taken seriously. The tone is to keep the readers attention.) It seems other then me and three people not a lot of people have taken reviewing at all seriously, and have made them only the same length as a bloody comment. So, you practically can call me Staredit.nets only reviewer, since I've posted review after review, not just stopping at one.

And to further bitch about that Furry thing. Does me being open minded make me a Furry? No, it just doesn't make me a thick headed twat. I don't care what others do, just as long as it doesn't hurt other people or creatures. It's also quite pathetic to have that as a reason to ban someone. Are you related to Hitler? I also wish to notify you I'm not retarded, I have what you call ''Asperger Syndrome.'' if you don't know what that is, go ahead and check it up. I'm sure you'll be quite surprised! And also, I'm not retarded just because my text usually has an over-the-top eerie amount of cheerfulness. And at least when I'm pissed, I get pissed in a civilized way instead of randomely cursing out swearwords non related to each other, nor do I use caps.

And if you do call me retarded, for the love of god don't do a typo on that same sentence! That just insults yourself and makes you look foolish. ("And I can say with certainty that his is a bonafide retard." I'm pretty sure you meant to type. "This is a bonafide retard." Right?) Just to add insult to injury, your post only had four lines, and that's if the last one can be considered a full one.

I mean, for the love of god! You call me a retard exactly three words after a typo! Just look at how much I wrote, do you see any typos? That's eight paragraphs, no mistakes. So, here's a bit of math for you. Three sentences make a paragraph. I have eight paragraphs. How much more are the odds of me screwing up a single word, a single letter more then you? I'm not saying I'm smart, but I'm merely stating that it's unwise to call someone a retard if you can't even do that in particular right. Aw well. I suppose I'll just continue with my little post. Regardless on who I'm writing to, it cheers me up immensely. Now, I'm not sure if it's quite accurate to call me a cancer. I still do have my contributions after all, so perhaps at most, at best you should call me a nuisance.

Now! It's time for my very own, unbiased verdict on if I should be:



Firstly, I never voted, and I won't vote whether I should be banned or not. Because, in such a case my answer would be quite obvious. Now lets take a look, I do agree that I can and I am annoying towards some, or many people. At the same time however, I'm not all that bad if you're fine with someone that's almost always either cheerful or sarcastic, mocking and joking about something.

Someone else noted I spam a lot, I say quite the difference. Spam is when you basically say a bunch of crap with no meaning, often in repetition with only the purpose as to annoy other people. Meanwhile, what I type always has at least something worth reading in it, joking or not. But I do agree with you I should learn to edit instead of double posting, but I do have a reason behind this. I hardly use any other forums, and sadly I never actually noticed "edit" until people were bitching about it recently due to my numerous humiliating mistakes. A few of my flaws is that I hold grudges, and that when I get pissed off, I can really get pissed off. Trust me, when you see me taking a spaz, but that tantrum still being literate, that is still taking a lot of will power as opposed to what I really want to do.

Obviously, from what you're all quite aware is that I'm not very good with computers. Sorry, but if it's right to justify someone is stupid just because they don't know much about computers then it's also right to justify that killing someone is all right if the murderer can get away with it. I also am quite aware my loads of writing can be annoying, and not everyone will take the time to read it. At the same time however, it's also fair to assume I put thought into what I write. That way, my opinions can not always be entirely biased.

Final Words - No matter how unbiased someone can try to be, there will always be a bias. So of course, I don't believe I should be banned. However, I don't think it's worth posting up an entire thread with only intent to ban someone. Because obviously eventually, I the one you wish banned would reply to such a thread. And also, it's easy to condemn someone with just a bunch of posts, especially when some of those people that see such posts already had a bad first impression, and for some the first they see are a bunch of distorted figures of the real person, and that again is a bad impression they receive. Basically, I can't say this threads concept is very mature either. Throughout history, it's always been close minded people that caused suffering over others. Sometimes it's best to judge people on what's to be seen of them instead of what has already been seen of them.


Edited -

I give a thanks to those against the ban. And hell, I even give compliments to those which can actually state their reasons why they find I should be banned.

Post has been edited 1 time(s), last time on Jan 25 2009, 11:03 am by lSHaDoW-FoXl.

Quoted for truth. This sentence can represent anyone, including me, in any situation of any forum.

Despite that I have never seen your posts before, this post is brilliant.

The above hug block of text is just so much cancer. It completely speaks for itself without my need to chop up and comment. My only regret is that I will never able to un-read that.

I was hoping against hope that every other active member might feel the same way which is the only way something like this would have succeeded. A narrow majority is not enough. I give up, please lock.

Can you somehow stop saying anything with an undertone of me being retarded without a typo? I mean honestly.

"The above hug(E) block of text is just so much cancer. It completely speaks for itself without my need to chop (it) up and comment. My only regret is that I will never able to un-read that."

Instead of saying it's cancer, can you actually propose something as proof that it actually is and prove a point? Other then just saying it's bad like a five year old? Anyone can just randomely say something is bad or wrong, why not actually support that opinion. This is a forum after all, not a kindergarten class. I'm quite doubtful you read that, and am quite sure you just skipped it and are just saying that in hopes people will just find your post.

I vote we just ban him for the lulz. Make SEN one big SEN Mafia and consider this day 1's lynch. More serious reasons when I am not on my PSP.

I propose we all take a lesson from our dear president. I don't feel like finding where he said this, but it's something along the lines of:
"I don't always respond to stuff. Sometimes I write out an entire response, then don't bother pushing submit because it's pointless."

Also, anyone who has more than 2.38 posts per day is a spammer, no question about that.
Then quit arguing. CAFG has admitted defeat, you are here to stay. Hopefully you will shape up, so CAFG (and most other people) will like you better. I don't think a topic to ban someone will EVER succeed, but it will at least communicate that there is a problem, and is a drastic step in resolving that problem.

CAFG, this isn't 4chan (however much I want to push it in that direction). Use more appropriate terms than 'cancer' to describe FoX. I'm against banning him, simply because your descriptions of him annoy me.

@FoX: tl;dr

I changed my mind, on looking at his posts again, it seems I was remembering wrong. You're not nearly as bad as I thought you were, and definetly not worthy of being banned.

*votes NO and encouraged others to do the same, not that it will matter*

Someone should lock this and punch CAFG...

I think this is way offensive and in this fact, kidblaze also isn't really popular but he even should not be banned, too.
People change, give him time.
I vote for No

EDIT: this.

Post has been edited 2 time(s), last time on Jan 25 2009, 1:22 pm by DeVouReR.

Some of you are missing why Shadow fox is outright annoying. I partially agree with CAFG, actually. It's not just the patch topic. I was going to send you a pm shadow, but instead, I'll do it here:
You need to calm down. You have like posting ADD. Learn to edit, not double and triple post. Especially to add frivolous little tidbits.

And your whole little colorful representation of the word 'Banned' just quirks me. I won't bother reading your post.

Well, the main problem is, if shadow fox personally think he deserves to be banned, then there's a problem. Being a nuisance is one thing, but being aware that you're a nuisance but persisting is another. If not banned, he should take a lesson from this and stop being annoying.

There were a few.

Shadowfox looks like a bot. Get to the point and stop whining about every little thing. People here generally don't like crybabies.

Give him a week or two.
Suspension if needed.
Give him a week or two.
Death if needed.

Awesome, you actually remember me saying that.

Anyway, I can say that Shadow's posts aren't stupid. If you want stupid go look back at members like ggg or durk-a-dur. I think CAFG just dislikes the way Shadow posts. I see Shadow's posts as having a sort of feminine rambling quality to them at times, but that's up to the interpretation of the reader. Generally, they do contain good and relevant points and they are not just pure spam or trolling. I also believe that they're written with good intentions.

Post has been edited 2 time(s), last time on Jan 25 2009, 4:10 pm by Barack Obama.

WE GOT A STALEMATE

Well I'm convinced, EPIC CHEMO GOGOGO

Can someone summarize that huge wall of text? too lazy to read.
GG. since it doesn't matter(INB4 It never did) now I would've voted to not ban. Maybe if he had some eloquence here he could get away with half the posts that he posted.