"Do you know which of these doors is in front of the treasure?"
If you get the truth-teller, they'll tell you which door has the treasure. If you get the liar, they'll say they don't know.
None.
We can't explain the universe, just describe it; and we don't know whether our theories are true, we just know they're not wrong. >Harald Lesch
"Do you know which of these doors is in front of the treasure?"
If you get the truth-teller, they'll tell you which door has the treasure. If you get the liar, they'll say they don't know.
So you only 50% of getting the treasure. Which isn't our goal.
Also your question implies another (where is the door). But there's only 1 question allowed, so the knight will just say yes.
Nude, you already got the question right. And fatal's your answer does not work... because asking the knight if he knows which door will not get him to tell you which door the treasure behind. He'll just say yes or no.
None.
How much wood could woodchuck chuck if a woodchuck could chuck wood?
None.
Using the formula: (W + I) * C where W = the constant of wood, which is well known to be 61, as agreed in many scientific circles. I = the variable in this equation, and stands for the word "if" from the original problem. As there are three circumstances, with 0 equaling the chance that the woodchuck cannot chuck wood, 1 being the theory that the woodchuck can chuck wood but chooses not to, and 2 standing for the probability that the woodchuck can and will chuck wood, we clearly must choose 2 for use in this equation. C = the constant of Chuck Norris, whose presence in any problem involving the word chuck must there, is well known to equal 1.1 of any known being, therefore the final part of this calculation is 1.1. As is clear, this appears to give the answer of (61 + 2) * 1.1 = (63) * 1.1 = 69.3. However, Chuck Norris' awesome roundhouse kick declares that all decimal points cannot be used in formulas such as this, and so it must be rounded to the final solution of 69 units of wood.
None.
Using the formula: (W + I) * C where W = the constant of wood, which is well known to be 61, as agreed in many scientific circles. I = the variable in this equation, and stands for the word "if" from the original problem. As there are three circumstances, with 0 equaling the chance that the woodchuck cannot chuck wood, 1 being the theory that the woodchuck can chuck wood but chooses not to, and 2 standing for the probability that the woodchuck can and will chuck wood, we clearly must choose 2 for use in this equation. C = the constant of Chuck Norris, whose presence in any problem involving the word chuck must there, is well known to equal 1.1 of any known being, therefore the final part of this calculation is 1.1. As is clear, this appears to give the answer of (61 + 2) * 1.1 = (63) * 1.1 = 69.3. However, Chuck Norris' awesome roundhouse kick declares that all decimal points cannot be used in formulas such as this, and so it must be rounded to the final solution of 69 units of wood.
Gotta love Chuck Norris jokes xD
None.
We can't explain the universe, just describe it; and we don't know whether our theories are true, we just know they're not wrong. >Harald Lesch
What is it?
George Bush has a short one, Arnold Schwarzenegger a long one, couples often use it together, bachelors have it for themselves, Madonna has none and the pope never uses it.
We can't explain the universe, just describe it; and we don't know whether our theories are true, we just know they're not wrong. >Harald Lesch
Oh c'mon, a little more imagination please.
We can't explain the universe, just describe it; and we don't know whether our theories are true, we just know they're not wrong. >Harald Lesch
Lies.
A train of thought?
Couples think together
Bush has a small thought line.
Arnold has a huge one.
Madonna has none,
And the pope never uses his. LOL
None.
We can't explain the universe, just describe it; and we don't know whether our theories are true, we just know they're not wrong. >Harald Lesch
yes.
Your turn, swarm.
@Viet well so close
You are in your house. The clock says 7:30 PM. Then you drive to the store. It takes 10 minutes. When you get there, your watch says 7:30 PM.
DUN DUN DUN.
None.
Your watch and your clock are 10 minutes apart from each other?
The store is one-sixth of a timezone away and you cross that distance at amazing speeds because your car is secretly the Concorde?
None.
Your watch and your clock are 10 minutes apart from each other?
The store is one-sixth of a timezone away and you cross that distance at amazing speeds because your car is secretly the Concorde?
He said it takes 10 minutes