I see you've started to describe yourself in the second person.
You apparantly can't comprehend what I am talking about. Here is the scope of things if you can't understand.
-Centreri consoled someone for the loss of their mother
-You told Centreri not to fall for emotional appeal.
-I respond saying his argument wasn't changed by emotional appeal anyways
-You thought I was talking about redhead
-I wasn't
-You said you weren't referring to his argument and said my post was useless
-I said if you weren't referring to his argument, and you were instead referring to his opinion, it wouldn't be on topic anyways so I said your post was useless.
-You said I wasn't providing proof for why your post was useless
-I then clarified that personal opinion had nothing to do with the topic
-You then said I wasn't getting the right information from your message
-I asked for the supposed right information
-You said absolutely nothing, except a few sentences about why you thought I was talking about redhead
-I then prompted for the information again
-You still said absolutely nothing.
So if you can't get it the first two times, I'll ask you a third time:
What excuse do you have?
Lol owned. Btw, PwnPirate, you are wrong. You guys should really take these things to the pm box. (but at that point I don't think you guys would even bother
) Although it can be amusing to read from time to time, it is a bit much when you two do this in every single topic you converse in.
I don't know why I should respect your advice when you jump in the fray yourself and partake in a discussion that you are telling
us to stop. But if you really want to know I did take the last topic to PM, then devilesk basically just said I was an idiot and blocked me without even attempting to tell me he didn't want to argue. I'll admit I'm a bit stubborn in arguments, but I never delve into insult without provocation. If he's going to be rude, I have no problem defending myself.
Post has been edited 8 time(s), last time on Sep 24 2007, 12:19 am by PwnPirate.
None.