Maybe you guys need a 4th person to point out that you'll never convince each other of anything.
It's quite flattering to see my name in every post, though
.
Normally it would have been a slight comment, maybe some criticism, and then we would have moved on, had it not been the tone of Devilesk's posts.
Because it is what happened, and is fact.
Nope, I say my version is what happened, because it is actually what happened:
-Devilesk gives his opinion/advice
-PwnPirate says his offer of advice was wrong
-Devilesk makes a reply to PwnPirate which is correct
-PwnPirate didn't know who devilesk was talking about, which made all his previous arguements null, he then says:
Devilesk literally did not make a post that was right because he assumed the wrong thing, so therefore your post is rock solid wrong.
LoL at the most fail arguing ever. If you can't realize that this is all opinions (other than the questions), with no evidence, then why am I bothering. (seeing as how you claim opinion has nothing to do with it, and I give no evidence)
Nope,
there are opinions with evidence, such as Devilesk's and mine. Your posts on the other hand frequently have no evidence. If they have no evidence, they are to be assumed wrong until shown otherwise (devilesk's favorite Occam's razor). Note how I put that in my other post also? You're just flat out wrong.
I don't hold grudges, especially on the internet. I truly believe you are wrong. It's awful feeble-minded of you to assume I base my arguements in current discussions on past opinions of people.
Another contradiction in the same post, I can see I can't reason with you, but I might as well tell you anyways. If you don't hold grudges, if you never base your arguments on other topics and you only use reasoning, you wouldn't have made a flame comment about how I am so "feeble-minded" and you wouldn't have blatantly made the same one-sided post you made in two other topics.
If you honestly aren't letting past opinions affect your post, then you and devilesk should retract all your statements about my poor usage of assumptions. You both have a terrible problem with posting clearly and you attempt to argue things in useless inaccurate metaphors that have shown in the past not to get the message across. Not only that but both of you also make illogical assumptions about many things also, so what right do you have to complain about my assumptions, which at least have base?
I see you're still refering to yourself in the second person.
I'm done with this shit, if this post isn't clear enough for you, then whatever. It was fun owning you in the arguement while it was still intelligible, thank you.
Another contradiction, you still are providing no evidence for this statement in itself, so you are wrong and again flaming.
He was talking to RedHead, a key member of the conversation. He was giving aforementioned person advice from his point of view on something extremely relevant to the current discussion. That is in no way useless, happy?
Not that you would know what he was referring to because he never stated it (and he blatantly posted that he was referring to Centreri), but it would still in every respect be useless, because:
1. It is still personal opinion with no evidence
2. This makes it ridiculously vague and ineffective, to which devilesk has himself to blame.
3. It would mean that devilesk could have
clearly stated his intentions and reasoning in the very start of his argument, which would put him at fault for creating this entire argument.
Post has been edited 4 time(s), last time on Sep 25 2007, 3:09 am by PwnPirate.
None.