False. The "something else" refers to the next 4 words:
Ah. I wasn't aware that clues never took the form of hidden double-meanings.
...
Oh, wait, they quite easily can. =\
None.
Grand Moderator of the Games Forum
/abstain
Too busy with Warhammer Online
My Suspect list :
1) Dapperdan - He seems to jump into bandwagons after one clue
2) Greo - Supported by Dapperdan
3) Devilesk - O e d clue and highly suspescious
None.
My Suspect list :
1) Dapperdan - He seems to jump into bandwagons after one clue
2) Greo - Supported by Dapperdan
3) Devilesk - O e d clue and highly suspescious
1) I started the bandwagon before it was a bandwagon.
2) I don't support him. I think his clue intrepretations suck.
3) Maybe.
None.
devilesk [9:13 P.M.]: i am
devilesk [9:13 P.M.]: mafia
All the evidence we need!
None.
I like this too (your interpretation). Also, Darkling was extremely quick to stick up for TassadarZeratul, and very vehement about it. This strong pairing gives us a potential to kill two birds with one stone: if TassadarZeratul is mafia, I think the chances of Darkling being mafia go up exponentially, when added to the weight of evidence already against him (how do the mafia disappear? because they are darklings.)
You forget Zergling. Thats a double edged clue, and I would respect more evidence, since my name isn't exactaly "Zergling". Then again, I liked the clue against TZ, but I twisted it around, tried to make it more.. Plausible. Besides DTBK, I still abstained, I haven't voted anyone new yet.
Besides, you're voting for him. I smell hypocracy!
Lingie#3148 on Discord. Lingie, the Fox-Tailed on Steam.
I call manipulation on DT_Battlekruser!
Using sentences such as " I good be wrong, but I think he's on our side" is, for me, very suspicious, trying to influence people by manipulating their unconscious though
Plus, placing so much votes against others with only the Day 1 message seems very suspicious too
None.
I call manipulation on DT_Battlekruser!
Using sentences such as " I good be wrong, but I think he's on our side" is, for me, very suspicious, trying to influence people by manipulating their unconscious though
Plus, placing so much votes against others with only the Day 1 message seems very suspicious too
What, you expect us to NOT lynch someone based on the Day 1 clues?
How, exactly, would you achieve this?
Edit to avoid double-posting: I'll take this oppourtunity to vote for
TassadarZeratul. It's a long shot, but we have to lynch someone, and the leads against him aren't
completely ridiculous.
Post has been edited 1 time(s), last time on Sep 21 2008, 1:56 am by HailFire.
None.
The majestic mayor's mansion sits in the middle of the town, a symbol of order.
Look at PCFredZ contributions in his profile everyone. "Majesty ii rpg". Bingo Bango. I think this is the best clue we have so far, and for this reason, I change my vote to PcFredz. It's
just subtle enough to be a legit clue.
For vote counters: I vote PCFredZ.
None.
I think the MM words leads directly to a [MM] member.
But everyone, DEVILESK IS FOR VOTE.
None.
Hmmm....so much evidence against so many people....Can someone post the total amount of votes each person voted so far.
None.
ALL PRAISE YOUR SUPREME LORD CORBO
I think the MM words leads directly to a [MM] member.
Yes, we're the MMafia remember?
Anyway,
I'm voting HailFire. for the things that happened in the shoutbox.
fuck you all
I'm changing again from voting Hailfire to voting
Quote from Lol Word Effects
TassadarZeratul.
.
I'm kind of stuck between Greo and devilesk, but I'm kinda leaning towards Greo... He's changed his vote A LOT and been rather... Erm... Pissy.
I was kind of thinking of the zergling burrowing thing, though.
None.
Down with devilesk first, then Greo.
None.
I would like a vote tally as well. I'm confused on who's voting for who.
None.