[quote=name:Falkoner][url=http://www.staredit.net/topic/2754/]New topic for discussion[/url] Sorry for spamming up your topic, lil-inferno, it was in the name of StarCraft![/quote] That won't work. It's like telling kids if they're going to rough-house around, then play outside.

Quote from Falkoner

New topic for discussion

Sorry for spamming up your topic, lil-inferno, it was in the name of StarCraft!

That won't work. It's like telling kids if they're going to rough-house around, then play outside.

[quote=name:Impeached][quote=name:Falkoner][url=http://www.staredit.net/topic/2754/]New topic for discussion[/url] Sorry for spamming up your topic, lil-inferno, it was in the name of StarCraft![/quote] That won't work. It's like telling kids if they're going to rough-house around, then play outside.[/quote] Nah, it will work. A new topic [i]is [/i]better since it is its own topic dedicated to the discussion and it makes more sense to do it that way.

Quote from ws-Impeached

Quote from Falkoner

New topic for discussion

Sorry for spamming up your topic, lil-inferno, it was in the name of StarCraft!

That won't work. It's like telling kids if they're going to rough-house around, then play outside.

Nah, it will work. A new topic is better since it is its own topic dedicated to the discussion and it makes more sense to do it that way.

lil-inferno, if only you can add me through MSN (Windows Live Messenger), I'm willing to give you the zip file containing a few amount of maps if you still can't download anything from the download database.

lil-inferno, if only you can add me through MSN (Windows Live Messenger), I'm willing to give you the zip file containing a few amount of maps if you still can't download anything from the download database.

[quote=name:KrAzY]lil-inferno, if only you can add me through MSN (Windows Live Messenger), I'm willing to give you the zip file containing a few amount of maps if you still can't download anything from the download database.[/quote] Or, alternatively, you could just upload the zip on [url=www.mediafire.com]

Quote from KrAzY

lil-inferno, if only you can add me through MSN (Windows Live Messenger), I'm willing to give you the zip file containing a few amount of maps if you still can't download anything from the download database.

Or, alternatively, you could just upload the zip on http://www.mediafire.com

No thanks. :stfu:

No thanks.

[quote=name:KrAzY]No thanks. :stfu:[/quote] It takes about one minute :O .

Quote from KrAzY

No thanks.

It takes about one minute .

Fine. http://www.mediafire.com/?odotnmxluds There you go.

Fine. http://www.mediafire.com/?odotnmxluds

There you go.

Well, if [url=http://www.staredit.net/53389/]this[/url] is too simple for a concept map I have another one. It implements the idea of shareing resources between players. I know that resources' transformations is not a new thing but I've never seen the realization of shareing resources idea. This could be successfully used in melee-type games. The map: http://webfile.ru/1918721

Well, if this is too simple for a concept map I have another one.

It implements the idea of shareing resources between players. I know that resources' transformations is not a new thing but I've never seen the realization of shareing resources idea. This could be successfully used in melee-type games.

The map: http://webfile.ru/1918721

I didn't have the time yesterday to sift through all of those entires, sorry. I'll most likely get it done today.

I didn't have the time yesterday to sift through all of those entires, sorry. I'll most likely get it done today.

[quote=name:Wormer]Well, if [url=http://www.staredit.net/53389/]this[/url] is too simple for a concept map I have another one. It implements the idea of shareing resources between players. I know that resources' transformations is not a new thing but I've never seen the realization of shareing resources idea. This could be successfully used in melee-type games. The map: http://webfile.ru/1918721[/quote] Oooh, I didn't look at the map, but I assume that you detect when a player has more or less resources than the others, you reset their minerals to match that players, I like it, it's smexy :P

Quote from Wormer

Well, if this is too simple for a concept map I have another one.

It implements the idea of shareing resources between players. I know that resources' transformations is not a new thing but I've never seen the realization of shareing resources idea. This could be successfully used in melee-type games.

The map: http://webfile.ru/1918721

Oooh, I didn't look at the map, but I assume that you detect when a player has more or less resources than the others, you reset their minerals to match that players, I like it, it's smexy

Resource sharing has been realized by me and Antisleep. Where you been at? We had a whole discussion of it at maplantis, and it's in the maplantis wiki. [url=http://www.staredit.net/maplantis/index.php?sid=5976c4b1ba;wiki=118]Resource Sharing[/url] I had originally used the "most/least" and 2 computers to do this, but it requires 2 computers to do. The new method works with no computers, and I put it into a Space Pirate War map I edited. Have a [url=http://whathuh05.googlepages.com/SpacePirateWarEFf.scx]look[/url] if you really want to.

Resource sharing has been realized by me and Antisleep. Where you been at? We had a whole discussion of it at maplantis, and it's in the maplantis wiki.
Resource Sharing

I had originally used the "most/least" and 2 computers to do this, but it requires 2 computers to do. The new method works with no computers, and I put it into a Space Pirate War map I edited. Have a look if you really want to.

Wow! Haven't known this ^^ Very interesting... Thanks! I'll have a look at the map a bit later. Btw, I've just released the first (raw) version of the compiler for the MacroTriggers language I've designed for more convenient triggers codeing. Have a look at it at warbox forums ([url=http://www.warbox.us/viewforum.php?f=45]) and say what you think of it.

Wow! Haven't known this Very interesting... Thanks! I'll have a look at the map a bit later.

Btw, I've just released the first (raw) version of the compiler for the MacroTriggers language I've designed for more convenient triggers codeing. Have a look at it at warbox forums (http://www.warbox.us/viewforum.php?f=45) and say what you think of it.

[quote]I had originally used the "most/least" and 2 computers to do this, but it requires 2 computers to do. The new method works with no computers, and I put it into a Space Pirate War map I edited. Have a look if you really want to.[/quote] Really? I can't believe you guys made it like that at first, I don't see any reason to, it's quite simple to do it without computers. So Wormer, what does the language look like? Is it like: C: Player 1 brings 4 Terran Marine to Anywhere A: Kill All Men at Anywhere for Player 1 or what? I could write a Notepad++ file for it if it is, I've been wanting something like that.

Quote

I had originally used the "most/least" and 2 computers to do this, but it requires 2 computers to do. The new method works with no computers, and I put it into a Space Pirate War map I edited. Have a look if you really want to.

Really? I can't believe you guys made it like that at first, I don't see any reason to, it's quite simple to do it without computers.

So Wormer, what does the language look like? Is it like:

C:
Player 1 brings 4 Terran Marine to Anywhere
A:
Kill All Men at Anywhere for Player 1

or what? I could write a Notepad++ file for it if it is, I've been wanting something like that.

No, [u]I[/u] did it that way first, because its even more simple to comprehend than the other way. I had never used binary countoffs before that, so it's a learning experience when you do something new.

No, I did it that way first, because its even more simple to comprehend than the other way. I had never used binary countoffs before that, so it's a learning experience when you do something new.

[quote=name:Falkoner]So Wormer, what does the language look like? Is it like:[/quote] Well, Falkoner, I haven't got much time to describe it in all details now, but in general it is SCMD-like triggers synthax: [code]TRIGGER OWNERS: @P(1) CONDITIONS: Always() ACTIONS: PreserveTrigger() Wait(0) ENDT[/code] However it is typized language. For example you can't simply specify the integer number one in the OWNERS section. Inbuild operator @P constructs a player from the number one, the same applies for units, locations and etc. You can define variables to use them in your triggers. [code]PLAYER p = @P(1) INTEGER n = 1000 [/code] The language allows you easily multiplie triggers. One can specify binary countoffs like this: [code]UNIT dc = @U("Terran Marine") INTEGER nMaxDeg = 16 // count down values FOR i = nMaxDeg TO 0 BY -1 DO TRIGGER OWNERS: @P(1) CONDITIONS: Deaths(@CurrentPlayer, @AtLeast, 2^i, dc) ACTIONS: PreserveTrigger() SetDeaths(@CurrentPlayer, @Subtract, 2^i, dc) ENDT ENDL[/code] There is a number of other features. [quote=name:Falkoner]I could write a Notepad++ file for it if it is, I've been wanting something like that.[/quote] Thanks, I already have a Notepad++ synthax. There is a link to the archive at warbox. Have a look at it. I just don't want to spam the ladder again :D Let's move the discussion to warbox forums: [quote=name:Wormer]Have a look at it at warbox forums ([url=http://www.warbox.us/viewforum.php?f=45]) and say what you think of it.[/quote] [b]Edit:[/b] Well, I [i]think[/i] I can do something like the natural language synthax if it is really nessecary. But I just think it is simplier to write triggers in function-notation... [code] PLAYER Player1 = @P(1) UNIT Marine = @U("Terran Marine") TRIGGER OWNERS: Player1 CONDITIONS: Player1 brings @AtLeast 4 Marine to @Anywhere. ACTIONS: Kill @All @Men at @Anywhere for Player1. ENDT [/code]

Quote from Falkoner

So Wormer, what does the language look like? Is it like:

Well, Falkoner, I haven't got much time to describe it in all details now, but in general it is SCMD-like triggers synthax:

Code

However it is typized language. For example you can't simply specify the integer number one in the OWNERS section. Inbuild operator @P constructs a player from the number one, the same applies for units, locations and etc.

You can define variables to use them in your triggers.

Code

The language allows you easily multiplie triggers. One can specify binary countoffs like this:

Code

There is a number of other features.

Quote from Falkoner

I could write a Notepad++ file for it if it is, I've been wanting something like that.

Thanks, I already have a Notepad++ synthax. There is a link to the archive at warbox. Have a look at it.

I just don't want to spam the ladder again Let's move the discussion to warbox forums:

Quote from Wormer

Have a look at it at warbox forums (http://www.warbox.us/viewforum.php?f=45) and say what you think of it.

Edit:
Well, I think I can do something like the natural language synthax if it is really nessecary. But I just think it is simplier to write triggers in function-notation...

Code

[quote]I can't believe you guys made it like that at first[/quote] I've come to the realization that every idea that I can think of (that isn't so incredible that only I could think of it) has been thought up and created by somebody else. In other words, lots of people make stuff that nobody else knows about.

Quote

I can't believe you guys made it like that at first

I've come to the realization that every idea that I can think of (that isn't so incredible that only I could think of it) has been thought up and created by somebody else.
In other words, lots of people make stuff that nobody else knows about.

[quote]I've come to the realization that every idea that I can think of (that isn't so incredible that only I could think of it) has been thought up and created by somebody else. In other words, lots of people make stuff that nobody else knows about.[/quote] I meant that I'm surprised they did it the way they did the first time, since the way they ended up doing was exactly what I first thought of.

Quote

I've come to the realization that every idea that I can think of (that isn't so incredible that only I could think of it) has been thought up and created by somebody else.
In other words, lots of people make stuff that nobody else knows about.

I meant that I'm surprised they did it the way they did the first time, since the way they ended up doing was exactly what I first thought of.