omg that's rediculous

My rule was an odd numbered post (37), therefore you must do the inverse of what it says. This means you've made me inactive and active, which violates Rule 6. We're both out.

Jjf is now inactive, because his rule wasn't made up of quotes from existing or previously existing rules in this thread, and because execution is before evaluation, which lead to his rule going into effect only to contradict itself right after.

@Sac: Your rule violated rule 6 because if it's true then it violates itself and if it's false then it'd inverse itself and so on, and my post was AFTER your inversion rule, so I'm still in and you're out.

This rule is invalidated. It's too complicated.

Because of execution before evaluation, his own rule violated itself right after it was executed.

ahh I see
Any rule I make after this one is the inverse of what it says.

Don't we already have a game like this?

For any rule posted after this, if it violates "Rule 6: Logically indeterminate rules are against the rules (i.e., rules that cannot be determined if they violate or do not violate the rules). ", it is invalidated immediately without execution or evaluation.

Thank you

Archiving them Immutables

Nah, I wouldn't cheat.

If "Rules must be made up of quotes from existing or previously existing rules in this thread. " remains false, the following rule will come into effect: any player will gain the power to render Azrael inactive if he doesn't reply within 0.000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000001 nanosecond of me posting this post.

I render Azrael inactive. This is not a rule.

Your rule fails ;_;

Yeah you're right. You need to come back. Sacrieur is hereby active.

Any rules from now on made by Azrael.Wrath must not include any vowels or consonants. Azrael's posts must follow this rule, but he doesn't have to. This rule will be executed every time anyone makes a rulein this thread, and its execution precedes the execution of any other rule.

Sacriuer is now active, however, is rules do not execute until I quote them.

The second clause of your rule is incomprehensible.

I wish you could see the irony in this...

The second Is in my previous post Is now his.

Since I'll be leaving, a few last words: because it is now against the rules for there to be any consonants or vowels in Azrael's rules, if he posts one with consonants or vowels or both, he'd violate it, and consequentially his "I can not become inactive" rule will be violating "Rule 5: Players become inactive if they are shown to violate any previous rules." because of "Rule 0: All immutable rules are immutable and override any other rules created by players." .

New rule: If Azrael has once been inactive, he cannot be active again. This rule will be executed even if it is invalidated, negated or nullified.