Relatively ancient and inactive
Nothing about India and Pakistan eh? Everyone's too scared of nukes to really have a world war again. As much as Europe hates the US, all of Europe and the US would unite in the war, since it's stupid to challenge the most powerful nation in the world. The only way to beat the US is through terrorism/guerrilla warfare in a US occupied nation.
That being said, the only way to actually do any damage to the US with a nuke would be terrorism, and it's fucktardedly hard to actually get said nuke into the US. The best way would be to weather the canadian/alaskan north and ship it through the canadian border. Alternatively, I suppose you could just blow up a port, but good luck with that.
I already mentioned India and Pakistan in passing - it's just that India and China are taking a rather passive foreign stance right now. You don't really know what they'll do, especially China. As to getting the nuke over the border... you obviously haven't heard about Russia's thousands of nuclear warheads and a ton of missiles to carry them to boot. I'm pretty sure that a few Topol-M and, in a few years, the currently-tested Bulava missiles will be able to bypass pretty much all barriers. It's very hard to defend against a well-designed missile carrying a nuclear warhead, and the US doesn't have the capability yet. Even the interceptor missiles, such as those to be stationed in Poland, are rather ineffective - they work by predicting where the missile will be based on angle, speed, etc. Topol-M and Bulava can change direction in flight (probably not 90 degrees in a few seconds, but certainly enough) and deploy decoys.
The nice thing is, I was under the impression that the FOAB, a Russian thermobaric bomb that matches a small nuclear weapon in power, was going to be attached to a missile so it can now destroy you wherever you live without starting a nuclear war. Well, nice from my perspective - nasty Americans. I don't think that technology is functional yet, though. The US is doing something similar - key word trident.
From a nuclear superpower, no one's safe.
And, yeah, Matt... you might've heard about the nasty side-effects of nuclear weapons.
I'd also like to point out that Russia doesn't really have a large financial crisis - just a probably temporary stock market crisis. There's nothing fundamentally wrong in Russia as there is in the US - no companies suddenly collapsing, etc. Additionally, Russia has the 3rd largest financial reserves (piggybank money) at $500 billion after China (with 1.8 trillion $$) and India. That allows it to prevent these sorts of crashes by lending money to banks and all that. The US, at $9.7 trillion in debt (Most countries have both debt and reserves - however, the US's debt is huge compared to its reserves right now), can't really afford to pump more and more money into banks.
http://www.cnn.com/2008/BUSINESS/09/19/russia.stock.exchange.ap/index.html
Post has been edited 2 time(s), last time on Sep 20 2008, 2:58 am by Centreri.
None.