First:
I was reading through all the ToS and things that they link off to, and I noticed something interesting:
Posting of unprotectors or links to unprotectors is not allowed.
Found it in
this place.
I'm sure it was a good idea at the time, but there are plenty of links to unprotectors all over the site, and I feel this should be removed/changed.
Secondly:
http://www.staredit.net/wiki/Nuclear_Strike_Damagehttp://www.staredit.net/wiki/Nuclear_Missile_DamageThese wikis were EXTREMELY helpful and informative, but I didn't need to read it twice to understand it. =P
So what I'm saying is get rid of one of them... (Yes that's right, I'm talking to all you sexy admins out there)
The only tangible difference between them is the presence of an extra "enter" keystroke between the picture and the following paragraph.
Thanks in advance all of you,
TiKels
PS: Don't report/ban me please (It always happens when I post)
"If a topic that clearly interest noone needs to be closed to underline the "we don't want this here" message, is up to debate."
-NudeRaider
I guess this topic won't be bugged.
For #1: I'll notify Moose
For #2: someone should merge them in a way.
I cannot do these.
Please report errors in the Staredit.Network forum.
TiKels, as much as I completely agree with you on #1, Moose obviously does not, judging by the deletion of the three unprotectors I've uploaded to the DLDB at different times.
None.
We can't explain the universe, just describe it; and we don't know whether our theories are true, we just know they're not wrong. >Harald Lesch
SEN still officially disapproves of unprotectors, but sometimes they just slip through.
Where are links to unprotectors? I have yet to see any.
Currently Working On: My Overwatch addiction.
Every time I post, you have 2 links to a page which is a click away from a page with basically every unprotector available. That's 13376 links to unprotectors, at least.
None.
For #2: someone should merge them in a way.
There are physically identical to every keystroke (except an enter between the picture and the next paragraph), not even presented in a different fashion... There's nothing to merge, one should be deleted.
"If a topic that clearly interest noone needs to be closed to underline the "we don't want this here" message, is up to debate."
-NudeRaider
Every time I post, you have 2 links to a page which is a click away from a page with basically every unprotector available. That's 13376 links to unprotectors, at least.
I still don't count those as links to unprotectors all over the site, let alone two links being "plenty."
Currently Working On: My Overwatch addiction.
Hey ho, lock this yo!
(Always wanted to say that/use that Smilie)
"If a topic that clearly interest noone needs to be closed to underline the "we don't want this here" message, is up to debate."
-NudeRaider
Hey ho, lock this yo!
(Always wanted to say that/use that Smilie)inb4lock.
Isn't that considered spam? (Tries to get you to delete your "inb4lock post")
"If a topic that clearly interest noone needs to be closed to underline the "we don't want this here" message, is up to debate."
-NudeRaider
