[IMG=http://img519.imageshack.us/img519/5697/iwindowsloginmi2.png] [img]http://img89.imageshack.us/img89/7416/deskdowszf3.png[/img] :D Windows OSX! I made it, and Mr.sexydude err Prawker helped me with all the windows apps. Thanks :D , Opinions??

Windows OSX!

I made it, and Mr.sexydude err Prawker helped me with all the windows apps.

Thanks , Opinions??

/universe implodes Is this real? It could very well be some Vista and OSX screenshots mashed together... And I think merging two OSes together is unneccesary and probably illegal.

/universe implodes

Is this real? It could very well be some Vista and OSX screenshots mashed together...

And I think merging two OSes together is unneccesary and probably illegal.

He didn't merge them... <_< It is so easy to fake it. I WUB IT!!!!

He didn't merge them... <_< It is so easy to fake it. I WUB IT!!!!

Great, you've turned a decent computer into a piece of shit. Kudos?

Great, you've turned a decent computer into a piece of shit. Kudos?

This idea has already been beaten to death.

This idea has already been beaten to death.

[quote=chui]Great, you've turned a decent computer into a piece of shit. Kudos?[/quote] If you want to argue about Mac OS X and Mac hardware and how they are a "pieces of shit" I would love to.. ;) Just because you don't use it and don't like it doesn't mean it's a piece of shit.

Quote from chui

Great, you've turned a decent computer into a piece of shit. Kudos?

If you want to argue about Mac OS X and Mac hardware and how they are a "pieces of shit" I would love to.. Just because you don't use it and don't like it doesn't mean it's a piece of shit.

Didn't he start with a Mac?

Didn't he start with a Mac?

[quote=~:Deathawk:~][quote=chui]Great, you've turned a decent computer into a piece of shit. Kudos?[/quote] If you want to argue about Mac OS X and Mac hardware and how they are a "pieces of shit" I would love to.. ;) Just because you don't use it and don't like it doesn't mean it's a piece of shit.[/quote] I don't use it because I don't need a mac and I like playing PC games. I don't like it because ... read my previous sentence.

Quote from ~:Deathawk:~

Quote from chui

Great, you've turned a decent computer into a piece of shit. Kudos?

If you want to argue about Mac OS X and Mac hardware and how they are a "pieces of shit" I would love to.. Just because you don't use it and don't like it doesn't mean it's a piece of shit.

I don't use it because I don't need a mac and I like playing PC games. I don't like it because ... read my previous sentence.

It is not Mac OS X or Mac hardware's fault that they do not play games, they are perfectly fine, they are not shit. They are more than capable of running games. If the only thing wrong with them is that you don't need one and they don't play games that aren't programmed for them, then you should SHUT THE HELL UP, LOL! If anything, it is programmers fault for not programming their programs to run on multiple platforms.

It is not Mac OS X or Mac hardware's fault that they do not play games, they are perfectly fine, they are not shit. They are more than capable of running games. If the only thing wrong with them is that you don't need one and they don't play games that aren't programmed for them, then you should SHUT THE HELL UP, LOL!

If anything, it is programmers fault for not programming their programs to run on multiple platforms.

They don't do it because its very time consuming for an extra 2% income.

They don't do it because its very time consuming for an extra 2% income.

So how the hell does that make the operating system and the hardware off less quality? Oh wait.. All that means is that the operating system is less popular. Sort of like Linux compared to Windows, so I'm guessing you think Linux is a piece of shit too? But you know what does make something less quality? Having to use two gigabytes of RAM for an operating system just for it to run smoothly. Or having to deal with problems like security. What does that remind you of?

So how the hell does that make the operating system and the hardware off less quality?

Oh wait..

All that means is that the operating system is less popular. Sort of like Linux compared to Windows, so I'm guessing you think Linux is a piece of shit too?

But you know what does make something less quality? Having to use two gigabytes of RAM for an operating system just for it to run smoothly. Or having to deal with problems like security. What does that remind you of?

Sorry, I use Windows 2k, I don't need 2gigs of ram or have any security issues. And I think Linux is great, it can do everything Windows can without hogging up as much resources.

Sorry, I use Windows 2k, I don't need 2gigs of ram or have any security issues. And I think Linux is great, it can do everything Windows can without hogging up as much resources.

Regardless of whether you use it or not, the fact is that Windows Vista takes about two gigabytes for it to run smoothly and is much more vulnerable to viruses than Mac OS X and whatever else you want to throw in there. Whether you get viruses or not, does not matter either. Windows 2000 does have security issues. So if you want an OS to comment on, start there. So wait... you think Mac OS X is a piece of shit since it can't play games.. then, we come to the conclusion that OS X can't play games because it's not as popular as Windows.. then we come to the conclusion that OS X and Linux are both not as popular as Windows. So with that being said, Linux suffers the same problem that OS X has (it can't play games not programmed for it) yet you don't call Linux shitty. So basically, you just dislike Mac because you have no clue what you are talking about.

Regardless of whether you use it or not, the fact is that Windows Vista takes about two gigabytes for it to run smoothly and is much more vulnerable to viruses than Mac OS X and whatever else you want to throw in there. Whether you get viruses or not, does not matter either. Windows 2000 does have security issues. So if you want an OS to comment on, start there.

So wait... you think Mac OS X is a piece of shit since it can't play games.. then, we come to the conclusion that OS X can't play games because it's not as popular as Windows.. then we come to the conclusion that OS X and Linux are both not as popular as Windows. So with that being said, Linux suffers the same problem that OS X has (it can't play games not programmed for it) yet you don't call Linux shitty.

So basically, you just dislike Mac because you have no clue what you are talking about.

I don't know why you keep saying Linux can't play games, It doesn't have all the compatibility issues Mac users struggle over. The right Linux build works fine with most games playable on Windows. Furthermore I am not using Vista, and I don't know why you would compare operating systems released 6 years apart, whereas I'm comparing two OS's released 1 year apart. And again [b]I do not have security issues[/b]. I don't know why some people do, but in the years I have used 2k I can't recall a single time someone has hacked into my computer or stolen any of the information on it. The very worst thing I've seen is a Trojan virus which didn't live more than a few hours and didn't accomplish anything except to redirect every shortcut link to another folder. And lastly, I never once said OSX was a piece of shit. You're assuming that based on the fact I called the way his windows is setup a piece of shit. What he has done is officially duplicate another operating system over his current one, I assume, using programs he legally and/or illegally obtained over the internet. Its both useless because Windows pretty much has all the features he just added and more harmful to his computer due to the extra memory he's eating up.

I don't know why you keep saying Linux can't play games, It doesn't have all the compatibility issues Mac users struggle over. The right Linux build works fine with most games playable on Windows.

Furthermore I am not using Vista, and I don't know why you would compare operating systems released 6 years apart, whereas I'm comparing two OS's released 1 year apart. And again I do not have security issues. I don't know why some people do, but in the years I have used 2k I can't recall a single time someone has hacked into my computer or stolen any of the information on it. The very worst thing I've seen is a Trojan virus which didn't live more than a few hours and didn't accomplish anything except to redirect every shortcut link to another folder.

And lastly, I never once said OSX was a piece of shit. You're assuming that based on the fact I called the way his windows is setup a piece of shit. What he has done is officially duplicate another operating system over his current one, I assume, using programs he legally and/or illegally obtained over the internet. Its both useless because Windows pretty much has all the features he just added and more harmful to his computer due to the extra memory he's eating up.

And if you haven't noticed people have started programming more games for mac seeing as how much more interest it's been getting. On a side note that template doesn't look like osx a whole lot And also mac is also a PC.

And if you haven't noticed people have started programming more games for mac seeing as how much more interest it's been getting.

On a side note that template doesn't look like osx a whole lot

And also mac is also a PC.

[quote]I don't know why you keep saying Linux can't play games, It doesn't have all the compatibility issues Mac users struggle over. The right Linux build works fine with most games playable on Windows.[/quote] Linux can't run a lot of games natively. A lot of companies have do not program games for Linux natviely. And lol, if you're telling me running games in Cedega/WINE is even worth considering, then you're really wrong. It doesn't compare to running native at all. A lot of games do not work too. Also, it's not like Mac does not have games running for it too. [quote]Furthermore I am not using Vista, and I don't know why you would compare operating systems released 6 years apart, whereas I'm comparing two OS's released 1 year apart. And again [b]I do not have security issues[/b]. I don't know why some people do, but in the years I have used 2k I can't recall a single time someone has hacked into my computer or stolen any of the information on it. The very worst thing I've seen is a Trojan virus which didn't live more than a few hours and didn't accomplish anything except to redirect every shortcut link to another folder.[/quote] Ermm, I don't understand with this two OS's released 6 years apart and all that stuff.. Care to elaborate..? I do not care about your personal experience, there are more security holes in XP/2000/Vista WHATEVER than there is on OS X. [quote]And lastly, I never once said OSX was a piece of shit. You're assuming that based on the fact I called the way his windows is setup a piece of shit. What he has done is officially duplicate another operating system over his current one, I assume, using programs he legally and/or illegally obtained over the internet. Its both useless because Windows pretty much has all the features he just added and more harmful to his computer due to the extra memory he's eating up.[/quote] So wait, you deny calling OS X a piece of shit this far into the argument? Okay. However, if his computer runs fine or without any slowdown, I don't see a problem with making it more functional and better looking.

Quote

I don't know why you keep saying Linux can't play games, It doesn't have all the compatibility issues Mac users struggle over. The right Linux build works fine with most games playable on Windows.

Linux can't run a lot of games natively. A lot of companies have do not program games for Linux natviely.

And lol, if you're telling me running games in Cedega/WINE is even worth considering, then you're really wrong. It doesn't compare to running native at all. A lot of games do not work too. Also, it's not like Mac does not have games running for it too.

Quote

Furthermore I am not using Vista, and I don't know why you would compare operating systems released 6 years apart, whereas I'm comparing two OS's released 1 year apart. And again I do not have security issues. I don't know why some people do, but in the years I have used 2k I can't recall a single time someone has hacked into my computer or stolen any of the information on it. The very worst thing I've seen is a Trojan virus which didn't live more than a few hours and didn't accomplish anything except to redirect every shortcut link to another folder.

Ermm, I don't understand with this two OS's released 6 years apart and all that stuff.. Care to elaborate..?
I do not care about your personal experience, there are more security holes in XP/2000/Vista WHATEVER than there is on OS X.

Quote

And lastly, I never once said OSX was a piece of shit. You're assuming that based on the fact I called the way his windows is setup a piece of shit. What he has done is officially duplicate another operating system over his current one, I assume, using programs he legally and/or illegally obtained over the internet. Its both useless because Windows pretty much has all the features he just added and more harmful to his computer due to the extra memory he's eating up.

So wait, you deny calling OS X a piece of shit this far into the argument?

Okay. However, if his computer runs fine or without any slowdown, I don't see a problem with making it more functional and better looking.

[quote=~:Deathawk:~]Ermm, I don't understand with this two OS's released 6 years apart and all that stuff.. Care to elaborate..? I do not care about your personal experience, there are more security holes in XP/2000/Vista WHATEVER than there is on OS X.[/quote] You're comparing OSX, released in 2001, to Vista, released in 2007. Also, just because no one gives a shit about OSX doesn't mean there aren't security holes all over. For all you know it might be more vulnerable than Windows but you never will know because we can safely assume the greater majority of all hackers and virus authors only target Windows and Windows based operating systems purely because they dominate the market. Sure you can claim macs have less problems in these fields, but like I just said ...

Quote from ~:Deathawk:~

Ermm, I don't understand with this two OS's released 6 years apart and all that stuff.. Care to elaborate..?
I do not care about your personal experience, there are more security holes in XP/2000/Vista WHATEVER than there is on OS X.

You're comparing OSX, released in 2001, to Vista, released in 2007.

Also, just because no one gives a shit about OSX doesn't mean there aren't security holes all over. For all you know it might be more vulnerable than Windows but you never will know because we can safely assume the greater majority of all hackers and virus authors only target Windows and Windows based operating systems purely because they dominate the market. Sure you can claim macs have less problems in these fields, but like I just said ...

... I think I'm going to start a quest to h4x0r Macs now, just because of this argument. And iWindows... NO.

... I think I'm going to start a quest to h4x0r Macs now, just because of this argument.

And iWindows... NO.

[quote=chui][quote=~:Deathawk:~]Ermm, I don't understand with this two OS's released 6 years apart and all that stuff.. Care to elaborate..? I do not care about your personal experience, there are more security holes in XP/2000/Vista WHATEVER than there is on OS X.[/quote] You're comparing OSX, released in 2001, to Vista, released in 2007. Also, just because no one gives a shit about OSX doesn't mean there aren't security holes all over. For all you know it might be more vulnerable than Windows but you never will know because we can safely assume the greater majority of all hackers and virus authors only target Windows and Windows based operating systems purely because they dominate the market. Sure you can claim macs have less problems in these fields, but like I just said ...[/quote] What do you think Tiger, Lepoard, Puma etc are? They are upgrades, like XP to Vista, etc. OS X is built on a better kernel, at least. :\

Quote from chui

Quote from ~:Deathawk:~

Ermm, I don't understand with this two OS's released 6 years apart and all that stuff.. Care to elaborate..?
I do not care about your personal experience, there are more security holes in XP/2000/Vista WHATEVER than there is on OS X.

You're comparing OSX, released in 2001, to Vista, released in 2007.

Also, just because no one gives a shit about OSX doesn't mean there aren't security holes all over. For all you know it might be more vulnerable than Windows but you never will know because we can safely assume the greater majority of all hackers and virus authors only target Windows and Windows based operating systems purely because they dominate the market. Sure you can claim macs have less problems in these fields, but like I just said ...

What do you think Tiger, Lepoard, Puma etc are? They are upgrades, like XP to Vista, etc.
OS X is built on a better kernel, at least. :\

Go ahead and compare them: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_kernels They are about the same. Also, Linux wipes the floor with both NT and XNU.

Go ahead and compare them:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_kernels

They are about the same. Also, Linux wipes the floor with both NT and XNU.