Moose, Centreri constantly wants to be right, even if in the wrong. He's not worthy of SD (he is if you add T.)
None.
Since when was telling someone you want to be disrespectful -- respectful?
Moose, Centreri constantly wants to be right, even if in the wrong. He's not worthy of SD (he is if you add T.)
Moose, Centreri constantly wants to be right, even if in the wrong. He's not worthy of SD (he is if you add T.)
Quote
CAFG called you trigger happy 
.
.What's wrong with being trigger happy?
Lol@the rest of this thread.
None.
tl;dr
You know what would solve all of the complaints about strictness in SD? bring back LD
You know what would solve all of the complaints about strictness in SD? bring back LD
None.
Thigh high affectionado
Quote from name:Deathman101
tl;dr
You know what would solve all of the complaints about strictness in SD? bring back LD
You know what would solve all of the complaints about strictness in SD? bring back LD
And doing so would reunite the bond between null and SD once again, as they had found a center known as LD.
Bring back the welcome forum as well. I've PM'd you my reasons...
None.
aka idmontie
How about we just turn SEN into 4chan?
Just want to say that I totally agree with what devilesk/urine/noob/PresidentObama said.
If your thread gets closed, tough.
If your posts get deleted, tough.
If you have a problem with moderation or rules, tough.
It's not the end of the world. Life goes on and there's still plenty you can do other than spending time acting all smart and intelligent in such forums with people you don't know.
If there is one minor thing I'd like to point out, it is that to me personally it seems as though some moderators use (unintentionally or not) their personal or perhaps even biased views as justifications for their actions (a while ago I PMed moose some examples so I hope at least he would understand.) It's not a recent thing, I've noticed it a lot for the past several months or so. Seems to me that moderators are more likely to hand out justice to threads and posts made by people whose point of views and/or arguments they disagree with than those whose point of views and/or arguments they agree with. Not saying that what they do is wrong, but when I see people of various sides of discussions or issues commit about the same reprehensible deeds sometimes I only see one side getting more "justice" rained down upon them.
Now if you get banned or suspended for any of the above, then that's somewhat of a different story...
Quote
The forum is called Serious Discussion not Intelligent Debate.
Serious != Intelligent
Discussion != Debate
Serious != Intelligent
Discussion != Debate
If your posts get deleted, tough.
If you have a problem with moderation or rules, tough.
It's not the end of the world. Life goes on and there's still plenty you can do other than spending time acting all smart and intelligent in such forums with people you don't know.
If there is one minor thing I'd like to point out, it is that to me personally it seems as though some moderators use (unintentionally or not) their personal or perhaps even biased views as justifications for their actions (a while ago I PMed moose some examples so I hope at least he would understand.) It's not a recent thing, I've noticed it a lot for the past several months or so. Seems to me that moderators are more likely to hand out justice to threads and posts made by people whose point of views and/or arguments they disagree with than those whose point of views and/or arguments they agree with. Not saying that what they do is wrong, but when I see people of various sides of discussions or issues commit about the same reprehensible deeds sometimes I only see one side getting more "justice" rained down upon them.
Now if you get banned or suspended for any of the above, then that's somewhat of a different story...
None.
Quote from name:MilleniumArmy
Just want to say that I totally agree with what devilesk/urine/noob/PresidentObama said.
Quote
The forum is called Serious Discussion not Intelligent Debate.
Serious != Intelligent
Discussion != Debate
Serious != Intelligent
Discussion != Debate
Well, to have a serious discussion you kinda need some intelligence and to be able to debate.
Quote from name:SD Rules
The goal of the Serious Discussion and these rules is to foster an environment fit for a higher caliber of intelligent discussion and debate not found in the other forums.
Quote from name:MilleniumArmy
If there is one minor thing I'd like to point out, it is that to me personally it seems as though some moderators use (unintentionally or not) their personal or perhaps even biased views as justifications for their actions (a while ago I PMed moose some examples so I hope at least he would understand.) It's not a recent thing, I've noticed it a lot for the past several months or so. Seems to me that moderators are more likely to hand out justice to threads and posts made by people whose point of views and/or arguments they disagree with than those whose point of views and/or arguments they agree with. Not saying that what they do is wrong, but when I see people of various sides of discussions or issues commit about the same reprehensible deeds sometimes I only see one side getting more "justice" rained down upon them.
None.
We live in a society.
The SD rules have been updated. Several clarifications and changes were made in other rules, but Rule 7 was for the most part rewritten.
Also, Serious Discussion is not necessarily a poor way of naming the forum after what it describes because "serious" has many applicable meanings:
(or it's a terrible name because the word has too many meanings and is ambiguous 
)
Post has been edited 4 time(s), last time on Apr 13 2009, 6:30 am by Mini Moose 2707.
Also, Serious Discussion is not necessarily a poor way of naming the forum after what it describes because "serious" has many applicable meanings:
Main Entry: se·ri·ous
Pronunciation: \ˈsir-ē-əs\
Function: adjective
Etymology: Middle English seryows, from Anglo-French or Late Latin; Anglo-French serious, from Late Latin seriosus, alteration of Latin serius weighty, serious; probably akin to Old English swę̄r heavy, sad
Date: 15th century
1: thoughtful or subdued in appearance or manner : sober <a quiet, serious girl>
2a: requiring much thought or work <serious study> b: of or relating to a matter of importance <a serious play>
3a: not joking or trifling : being in earnest <a serious question> b: <archaic> pious c: deeply interested : devoted <a serious musician>
4 : not easily answered or solved <serious objections> b: having important or dangerous possible consequences <a serious injury>
5: excessive or impressive in quality, quantity, extent, or degree <serious stereo equipment> <making serious money> <serious drinking>
Pronunciation: \ˈsir-ē-əs\
Function: adjective
Etymology: Middle English seryows, from Anglo-French or Late Latin; Anglo-French serious, from Late Latin seriosus, alteration of Latin serius weighty, serious; probably akin to Old English swę̄r heavy, sad
Date: 15th century
1: thoughtful or subdued in appearance or manner : sober <a quiet, serious girl>
2a: requiring much thought or work <serious study> b: of or relating to a matter of importance <a serious play>
3a: not joking or trifling : being in earnest <a serious question> b: <archaic> pious c: deeply interested : devoted <a serious musician>
4 : not easily answered or solved <serious objections> b: having important or dangerous possible consequences <a serious injury>
5: excessive or impressive in quality, quantity, extent, or degree <serious stereo equipment> <making serious money> <serious drinking>
)Post has been edited 4 time(s), last time on Apr 13 2009, 6:30 am by Mini Moose 2707.
https://www.collaborativefund.com/blog/how-this-all-happened/
https://thelastpsychiatrist.com/2012/11/hipsters_on_food_stamps.html
https://youtu.be/vyiXaCRwZTs
https://thelastpsychiatrist.com/2011/09/how_to_be_mean_to_your_kids.html
http://lab.cccb.org/en/renata-avila-the-internet-of-creation-disappeared-now-we-have-the-internet-of-surveillance-and-control/
https://thelastpsychiatrist.com/2012/11/hipsters_on_food_stamps.html
https://youtu.be/vyiXaCRwZTs
https://thelastpsychiatrist.com/2011/09/how_to_be_mean_to_your_kids.html
http://lab.cccb.org/en/renata-avila-the-internet-of-creation-disappeared-now-we-have-the-internet-of-surveillance-and-control/
You should name it "SRS DISCUSHUN" to take away a little more SRS.
As a wise man once said, "Why so serious?"
As a wise man once said, "Why so serious?"
None.
aka idmontie
I reiterate:
Quote
How about we just turn SEN into 4chan?
[10:34 am]
NudeRaider -- SEN doesn't rely on spammers initiate its sleep cycle. It hat fully automated rest and clean-up phases. Please understand that this is necessary for the smooth operation of the site. Thank you.[2024-5-16. : 8:36 pm]
Ultraviolet -- Inf, we've got a job for you. ASUS has been very naughty and we need our lil guy to go do their mom's to teach them if they fuck around, they gon' find out
Members Online: 8charlottee392ee2, 8audreye1922gp2, RIVE
RIVE