QA 49
Feb 18 2009, 3:32 pm
By: chuiu  

Feb 28 2009, 4:51 am chuiu Post #21



No, left is before right is after. I think the overseer is probably the only change that didn't matter. They should work on it a little more.



None.

Feb 28 2009, 7:37 pm Syphon Post #22



What I want to know about the new overseer is what is the player colour? The eyes?



None.

Feb 28 2009, 9:45 pm Biophysicist Post #23



I like the Dark Pylon, it would be so useful in UMS. I wonder if its spells work on non-Protoss units.

I wonder about the Orbital Command, it seems like it would be possible to mass Mules and screw with your opponents...



None.

Mar 1 2009, 1:02 am BiOAtK Post #24



I like the new graphics much better than the old ones.
Dark Pylon seems useless right now.
They're trying to get us to micro burrowing roaches with Zerg? In SC2, Zerg are complete macro now.



None.

Mar 1 2009, 3:04 am Biophysicist Post #25



I disagree about the Dark Pylon being useless... Faster mining is useful, at least. The energy-restore could also combo nicely with High Templar if you could build one close enought to the enemy's base. Same goes for the cloak spell and almost any unit.



None.

Mar 1 2009, 4:34 am Vi3t-X Post #26



The Dark Pylon is rigged. For an extra 50 minerals and Gateway prerequisite, you can:

Mine faster (thus, faster macro in general).
Cast faster (Mass Psi Storm).

All functions that Pylons can do.

This also means that:

Units can Warp into this pylon sector and warp back out. Proxy Heal Pylon. If the shield battery is still present, look at that. You have a genuine templar god.
Not to mention it also provides Psi.

And it looks cooler. :-_-:



None.

Mar 1 2009, 5:17 pm InsolubleFluff Post #27



Could you post a screenshot of the Dark Pylon, please? (Just the pylon, not the entire website. PSP will not load it.)



None.

Mar 1 2009, 6:17 pm Biophysicist Post #28




Thar yah go, Shocko.



Also, concerning the Dark Pylon:
Quote from From the StarCraft Wiki
Blizzard was not entirely happy with the dark pylon in February 2009, as they felt Null Shield was uncompetitive.


Post has been edited 2 time(s), last time on Mar 1 2009, 6:18 pm by James Buchanan. Reason: FOR AIUR



None.

Mar 1 2009, 10:05 pm InsolubleFluff Post #29



;o purty. Thank you kindly :)



None.

Options
  Back to forum
Please log in to reply to this topic or to report it.
Members in this topic: None.
[09:18 pm]
Ultraviolet -- 🔪🐈
[12:34 pm]
NudeRaider -- curiosity kills the cat!
[06:18 am]
Sylph-Of-Space -- No complaints here, i'm just curious!
[2024-5-18. : 11:05 pm]
Ultraviolet -- :wob:
[2024-5-18. : 3:55 pm]
Zoan -- :wob:
[2024-5-18. : 10:34 am]
NudeRaider -- SEN doesn't rely on spammers initiate its sleep cycle. It hat fully automated rest and clean-up phases. Please understand that this is necessary for the smooth operation of the site. Thank you.
[2024-5-18. : 3:45 am]
Sylph-Of-Space -- Does the shoutbox get disabled when there's spammers?
[2024-5-17. : 6:47 am]
NudeRaider -- lil-Inferno
lil-Inferno shouted: nah
strong
[2024-5-17. : 5:41 am]
Ultraviolet -- 🤔 so inf is in you?
[2024-5-17. : 4:57 am]
O)FaRTy1billion[MM] -- my name is mud
Please log in to shout.


Members Online: Ultraviolet, NudeRaider