I'd assume Corbo is intelligent enough to understand what the 'or' logical function stands for. In other words, Lethal is perfectly acceptable in Best UMS Helper category.
I disagree. What is the reasoning behind including the prepositional phrase "at the mapping forums" only with the "best" helper? I think it makes more sense that Corbo intended that preposition to go with both most helpful and best and just didn't want to repeat himself.
In other words he wrote what he did as a shortcut to mean:
This goes to the person that helps the most at the mapping forums or the best at the mapping forums, this includes melee as well.
I understand if you don't think the two statements are equivalent and that Corbo did intend for it to be just "helps the most" vs "helps the best at the mapping forums", however, my point is that why does best get to go with the mapping forums and not most?
Anyway, I think assigning "intelligence" with the proper logical usage of "or" is poisoning the well a bit. The usage of "or" that applies "at the mapping forums" with most and best would be a common thing for many people to do, including the most intelligent people. Corbo wasn't engaging in a formal argument when he was writing the topic so I'm assuming he was writing casually.
In other words, I don't think you can assume a certain interpretation of Corbo's statement simply because you assume an intelligent person would favor one usage over another.
Even if Corbo was intelligent enough to know how the logical function or works he could have just had a lapse when he wrote that sentence. You can't assume everyone is perfect all of the time.
And as I already stated an argument about an author's intention will get everyone nowhere. The only thing we can do is wait for Corbo to provide his input on this once and for all.
Also I question the usage of or in the first place. Using the phrases "helps the most" and "helps the best" can be considered redundant depending on how you define help. If there is only one degree of help then the person that would help the most is the one that helps the best. However, if you choose to categorize help into "good" help and "bad" help or how thorough someone is in helping, then I suppose you can make the quality over quantity argument. In that case helping the most would be different from helping the best.
Also, Kaias, we've been assuming that "helps the best" means the best helper. However, if you want to get into semantics, as you tried to do, "helps the best" could mean "helps the best people" or the best whatever. Anyway this just shows how a discussion over semantics is pointless and that we should just shut up until Corbo clarifies his statement.
Post has been edited 1 time(s), last time on Dec 27 2008, 7:14 pm by Mayor.
None.