hmmm, didnt want to read all 7 pages of this discussion, but i did skim through it to see the general discussion and i have come across a few misunderstandings/flawed arguements
ANTI-MARIJUANA
1. that driving under the influence of alcohol is not as damning and family seperating as driving under the influence of marijuana when you get caught
2. that the US/Canadian/your government is infallible or does not share any type of blame in the laws it creates and enforces, only law breakers are to blame
3. that the US/Canadian/your government has the responsibility, time, manpower, or money, to make every american a clean responsible individual
4. that an arguement against both legal and illegal drugs proves that an illegal drug is not on the same harm level as legal drugs
5. that personal opinion, experience, or belief proves that an illegal drug is not more harmful than legal drugs
basically, if your reason for siding with weed being illegal rests with the premise of it being:
harmful to family or other bystanders...... some legal drug-users hurt others, some illegal drug-users hurt no-one
against the law and only used by lawbreakers......... (see: martin luther king*)
harmful to the user and therefore the users should be controlled.......... but what about the unclean, self-destructive, and/or irresponsible legal-drug users
harmful period, and alot of harmful things should be outlawed......... fairly sound arguement, but there are other factors
harmful in my opinion/personal experience/religious book.......... everyone has an experience, you cancel each other out
than you are commiting a flawed arguement and you have only an (probably weak) opinion to state.
that said, there are also a few misunderstandings/flawed arguements
PRO-MARIJUANA
1. that the maturity/naivity/of those using marijuana/alcohol is relevant to the legality of the drug
2. that the US/Canadian/your government is corrupted, so it takes all or most of the blame in the laws it creates and enforces
3. that the US/Canadian/your government shouldnt guide those less informed/fortunate they have no business in individuals lives
4. that an arguement against legal drugs proves that an illegal drug is not on the same harm level as legal drugs
5. that personal opinion, experience, or belief proves that an illegal drug is less harmful than legal drugs
basically, if your reason for siding with weed being legal rests with the premise of it being:
used by idiots (iyo)....... some legal drug-users are idiots, some illegal drug-users are very smart
against the law because the government is greedy/corrupt........ (see: rodney king*)
personally, i agree with #3!......... but what about the unclean, self-destructive, and/or irresponsible
beneficial compared to alchohol so it should be legal......... fairly sound arguement, but there are other factors
beneficial in my opinion/personal experience/religious book......... everyone has an experience, you cancel each other out
than you are commiting a flawed arguement and you have only an (probably weak) opinion to state.
basically,
if your heart rate jumps to 220 and you nearly blow your load when someone posts for or against your opinion,
or if you are a cold calculating debator genius (iyo) , you are all making the mistake of not showing both sides in your arguement, and therefore making good points with weak explanation, or flawed points with strong explanation. if you are going to prove a point on a complex issue like this, it will take more than a one line sentence response to a bunch of quotes. that said, i will try to make an arguement or two for marijuana without making the logical mistakes already made in this topic and while staying objective(un-biased).
alcohol is a drug. it is
processed from many different substances through distilleries.
marijuana is a controlled substance. it is
grown in many different ways to produce different product. however, street dealers will lace this product with many dangerous drugs such as cocaine, lsd, etc. to get more money for a weaker product. my best comparison is how fresh fruit is more expensive than fruit kept fresh by preservatives.
therefore, alcohol can be abused like vicadin can be abused, and marijuana can be overly consumed like a potassium overdose from bananas.
alcohol is mainly legal, taxed, and socially accepted. there are unregulated alcohols like moonshine and absynth to name two that are illegal and more harmful/potent
marijuana is mainly illegal, untaxed, and not socially accepted. there are regulated amounts of marijuana, like medicinal marijuana, and those in holland, that are not very harmful/potent
my arguement is, because marijuana and alcohol mainly balance out in pros and cons, they should balance out in legality.but to address those who wish for all harmful addictive abused drugs to be illegal ill say this; in our society, the philosophy and for the most part, the law, limits correcting self harm to only the faster methods. this means shooting yourself and dealing/using cocaine are illegal because they can lead to a fast highly visible death, while compulsive gambling and OTC(over-the-counter) drug or alcohol addiction are legal because they do not get enough air time on fox, cnn, cbs, or abc. to illegalize all harmful drugs is enough of an infringement on personal freedom as this: being born fat will lead to a lifestyle of eating fatty foods and heart attack, so the government should institute a weight loss plan.
i like to drink, and i binge on occasion, but i act responsibly, have a plan, and friends that act as my backup should i go overboard. because i only drink on average 6-7 nights a month, my pocketbook stays intact and my lifestyle stays safe.
i can no longer smoke weed, because i work for the government, and besides them randomly drug testing, i am responsible enough to weigh the risk and wait for 3-7 years. but when i did, i once again acted responsibly and had a plan, and friends as a backup. i even smoked and drank at the same time. all with pocketbook and lifestyle intact.
so why should i have to give up my vices for the less responsible individual? since when has group punishment been an effective deterrent, yet alone a justified course of action?
marijuana should be legal because people should be responsible, and for a government to regulate harmless (neglecting self harm) behaviors like smoking marijuana by bannining them altogether is as absurd as banning bachelors from having multiple partners because it could lead to STDs. someone can smoke marijuana and drive/stab/steal/sloth their way to self destruction but they can also do that with alcohol. so once again i restate my point; marijuana and alcohol mainly balance out in pros and cons, they should balance out in legality.*martin luther king displayed civil disobedience by breaking the law while acting calm and coherent
*rodney king was a victim of police brutality, but he was also drunk and belligerent during the incident
Post has been edited 3 time(s), last time on Jul 21 2008, 2:54 am by hdogg86.
None.