Having levelable units a good idea?
Post #1 PunWisp Mar 27 2012, 1:29 am
Post #2
Ahli
Mar 27 2012, 1:46 am
|
Nothing yet! Almost done. Very powerful, very strong.
|
It really depends on the map's combat system how this will turn out.
If you throw this system into a default melee game, you will buff protoss because their units tend to live longer than for example Zerg units. But it will encourage stronger, beefy units like carriers and battle cruisers because they can benefit the most with these systems as the bonus is concentrated into one unit and kept alive until the whole unit dies instead of having the bonus split on multiple marines that crumble during the fight. In general, it shouldn't have a to big impact in a melee game except if you design all combat dynamics around that system. It will benefit players that keep their units alive. But sadly that's hardest for Zerg players as most of their units die like flies during combat while other races tend to keep their units alive more easily. So this bonus shouldn't be inceased on a kill basis, it should use an xp amount, so units need to kill multiple Zerglings to become stronger. Else Zerg becomes much weaker than the other races. In some situations these changes can have a big impact, too. For example in PvZ, a Zealot that kills a Zergling early game might start to 2 hit zerglings after leveling. Basically this would make the Zealot stronger by 33% versus Zerglings. ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Post #3 PunWisp Mar 27 2012, 2:28 am
|
I was thinking of applying it to melee games.
As for protoss I would agree. Since Protoss is stronger, could make it so protoss units that are killed give more xp from another race equivelent. So something like.. EXP GAIN Zerglings = 1xp Marines = 2xp Zealots = 3xp I think a better idea for these is to not give the leveling system to cannon fodder units. So marines/marauders, lings/roaches, zealots/stalkers. Instead give them to higher tiered units, such as siege tanks/battleships/thors/ghosts, Hydralisks/Ultras/Broods/corruptors, Archons/Collossus/Carriers/mothership. Something like that for the units who actually level. The cannon fodder units it may not be worth giving it to them, just because they are that, cheap cannon fodder, they wouldn't be hard to kill unless mass, and massing them may make this idea OP. Or if all units have leveling abilities, just require a lot of xp to level. Higher the tier unit, the more xp. Of course this can drastically change gameplay, and could create different styles of playing. Such as a small group of ghosts sniping out units to gain xp/levels. Or a collossus becoming considerably more powerful. However you can change what units have what attributes, so you can have it so some units only become harder to kill. Such as a ultra gaining more armor & health, siege gaining more HP, with slight splash dmg increase. Collossus with just more damage. Not all units need to have the same stat gains. ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Post #4
Jack[RCDF
Mar 31 2012, 9:11 pm
|
Skin to bone, steel to rust, ash to ashes, dust to dust.
|
That reminds me of Command and Conquer's veterancy system. I quite enjoyed that, although I don't think it would mesh well with SC2 proleague it'd be fun in more casual games and campaigns.
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Red classic. I have mostly left SEN except for the Temple Siege 2 forum (hidden to most of you). I am available via PM still, and Skype as JackRCDF. If it is important to you, you will find a way. Otherwise, you will find an excuse. -Unknown Magnificent! Perhaps you shouldn't be on SEN as much, too... Better than the iPad! |
0 members in this topic (italic members are currently writing a reply): None
+ guest(s)
+ guest(s)
[11:41 am]
[08:15 am]
[07:56 am]
[07:49 am]
[07:18 am]
[05:41 am]
[05:25 am]





![[close]](/images/up.gif)