Staredit Network > Forums > Technology & Computers > Topic: Making new comp
Making new comp
Jan 4 2012, 4:28 am
By: Wing Zero
Pages: < 1 « 2 3 4
 

Jan 17 2012, 12:54 pm NudeRaider Post #61

We can't explain the universe, just describe it; and we don't know whether our theories are true, we just know they're not wrong. >Harald Lesch

Well if it is indeed the registy, try using a system restore point from before the problem. Games might have to be reinstalled, but savegames should be unaffected.




Jan 18 2012, 1:51 am Wing Zero Post #62

Magic box god; Suck it Corbo

I ran prime95 while the hardware monitor was on, and as soon as the processor hits a certain temperature, the comp shuts down. So it is an overheating problem. I don't have room for any more fans on the case so what else can i do?




Jan 18 2012, 2:00 am Lanthanide Post #63



What "certain temperature"?

Check that you installed the CPU heat sink properly. It may not be properly/tightly anchored to the motherboard.



None.

Jan 18 2012, 5:45 am Wing Zero Post #64

Magic box god; Suck it Corbo

I think it was around 60 degrees Celsius




Jan 18 2012, 6:20 am Lanthanide Post #65



That's not very hot, it shouldn't really be shutting your computer down at that temperature.



None.

Jan 18 2012, 6:29 am Wing Zero Post #66

Magic box god; Suck it Corbo

Well it consistantly crashes when it reaches that temperature. I'll upload a couple pictures of the comp tomorrow, hopefully that'll help you guys spot something I missed.




Jan 18 2012, 1:47 pm rockz Post #67

ᴄʜᴇᴇsᴇ ɪᴛ!

underclock your ram. and repeat. Then underclock your cpu and repeat. It's likely your ram is incorrectly timed.



"Parliamentary inquiry, Mr. Chairman - do we have to call the Gentleman a gentleman if he's not one?"

Jan 18 2012, 7:54 pm Wing Zero Post #68

Magic box god; Suck it Corbo

Quote from rockz
underclock your ram. and repeat. Then underclock your cpu and repeat. It's likely your ram is incorrectly timed.
How would I do this?




Jan 19 2012, 5:48 pm rockz Post #69

ᴄʜᴇᴇsᴇ ɪᴛ!

Go into BIOS or UEFI (whichever you have, it looks like it's a bios) and scroll around. There should be a setting there on overclocking or clock control. Something will talk about ram timings, or maybe ram speed. Set it to lower the MHz or the CPU:RAM ratio.

I now realize this is all pretty vague, but BIOSes are almost all different, which is why UEFI is taking its place.



"Parliamentary inquiry, Mr. Chairman - do we have to call the Gentleman a gentleman if he's not one?"

Jan 19 2012, 8:24 pm Wing Zero Post #70

Magic box god; Suck it Corbo

My ram is at 9 9 9 24 right now, what should I set it to?




Jan 19 2012, 9:15 pm rockz Post #71

ᴄʜᴇᴇsᴇ ɪᴛ!

It's at 1600 MHz, you should set it to 1333 MHz for now. You might also kick the voltage up to 1.5 V (ddr3 is normally 1.5V, and your ram says it functions at 1.25 V), but I don't know if that will help.



"Parliamentary inquiry, Mr. Chairman - do we have to call the Gentleman a gentleman if he's not one?"

Jan 20 2012, 5:38 am Wing Zero Post #72

Magic box god; Suck it Corbo

Quote from rockz
It's at 1600 MHz, you should set it to 1333 MHz for now. You might also kick the voltage up to 1.5 V (ddr3 is normally 1.5V, and your ram says it functions at 1.25 V), but I don't know if that will help.
You rock man! It seems to be stable now, I managed to get it to 64 degrees without crashing. It's still too soon to tell if its all clear but thanks everyone for helping me out, I would never have attempted this on my own :cube:




Jan 21 2012, 9:30 pm rockz Post #73

ᴄʜᴇᴇsᴇ ɪᴛ!

Very glad to hear it worked. My RAM doesn't perform at stock speed either. I'm not sure what you did, but try various settings on the RAM first to see where it won't perform at. I would do this now so that you don't have to bother with it later.

When overclocking (or underclocking) RAM, what you're really dealing with is response time--how fast does data go in and then back out again? There's a few methods for this and the whole process makes things pretty vague:

First is the actual clock speed of the RAM (1600 MHz etc...). This is the speed of each clock cycle, and is not controlled by the RAM per se. It's actually controlled by a ratio between the RAM the clock speed of the CPU. Sandy Bridge computers (the new intel processor) all have their base clock (or bus speed) locked down for a number of reasons, and there was a big hubbub about it when they came out. That clock is 100 MHz (on my AMD it's 200 MHz and I can change that). From there, there is a "multiplier" which kicks up the speed to something they can advertise, ie a 40x multiplier for 4 GHz. The important part for RAM is the base clock though. From there a ratio kicks in and increases that base clock to a certain amount.

So once you have the memory speed set, there's also RAM timings. Read up if you want, but I'll summarize here. The two most important timings are the CAS latency and the Command Rate. CAS Latency is the 1st number listed, usually for ddr3 it's at 7-10. The command rate is the last one, and it's either 1T or 2T. The lower the timing the better. Note that older DDR RAM at say 400 MHz could have a CAS latency of 2-3, so the numbers aren't really comparable between different clock rates.

So here's the graphic for CAS Latency VS Clock speed. Note that the faster the clock speed, the higher the CAS Latency usually is, making faster ram a losing battle. But here's the kicker:
CL 2 @ 400 MHz = 2/(200*1e6) = 10 ns delay
CL 7 @ 1333 MHz means 7/(666*1e6) = 10.5 ns delay
The clock rates are halved because it's "Double Data Rate". Yeah it's pretty much BS. The "faster" clock speed RAM isn't actually as fast as the DDR1 stuff. As you get higher, you'll notice that the CAS Latency increases significantly, or the voltage increases. Also note that the voltage directly influences power consumption: P = I * V or P = I^2 R, so if you increase the voltage, the resistance isn't going to go down at all, which means you're only going to be using more current, thus increasing power consumption. However at +0.25 V you won't be noticing too much of an increase. It's only really important in battery limited situations.

I'm sure there's other benefits to having DDR3 over DDR1, and it might really be faster in some cases, but I really don't think your RAM has much to do with the computer's overall performance. Obviously you want to put decent RAM in a good computer, but even the fastest RAM is still going to be limited by other things: your HDD, CPU, and GPU are all usually bottlenecks before RAM. There are many reviews on RAM which only show, say 58 fps with the lowest RAM, and 61 fps with $70 more expensive RAM. Your money is better spent elsewhere, like on HDD, CPU, or GPU.

Also, heat spreaders are gimmicks. The only thing that matters is price/GB and how much you need.

Post has been edited 1 time(s), last time on Jan 21 2012, 9:42 pm by rockz.



"Parliamentary inquiry, Mr. Chairman - do we have to call the Gentleman a gentleman if he's not one?"

Jan 21 2012, 10:59 pm NudeRaider Post #74

We can't explain the universe, just describe it; and we don't know whether our theories are true, we just know they're not wrong. >Harald Lesch

What qualifies a DDR3 as a DDR3 anyway? What's the difference to DDR1?

answering my own question:
Quote
Technological advantages [of DDR3] compared to DDR2

Higher bandwidth performance, up to 2133 MT/s standardized
Slightly improved latencies as measured in nanoseconds
Higher performance at low power (longer battery life in laptops)
Enhanced low-power features


Post has been edited 1 time(s), last time on Jan 21 2012, 11:35 pm by NudeRaider.




Jan 21 2012, 11:18 pm Excalibur Post #75

The sword and the faith

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DDR3_SDRAM This should shed some light on the subject.




SEN Global Moderator and Resident Zealot
-------------------------
The sword and the faith.

:ex:
Sector 12
My stream, live PC building and tech discussion.

Jan 21 2012, 11:27 pm Aristocrat Post #76



Quote from rockz
There are many reviews on RAM which only show, say 58 fps with the lowest RAM, and 61 fps with $70 more expensive RAM. Your money is better spent elsewhere, like on HDD, CPU, or GPU.



Note that "worse" RAM can actually bench higher, so any differences can be chucked up to statistical variations.



None.

Options
Pages: < 1 « 2 3 4
  Back to forum
Please log in to reply to this topic or to report it.
Members in this topic: None.
[2024-4-27. : 9:38 pm]
NudeRaider -- Ultraviolet
Ultraviolet shouted: NudeRaider sing it brother
trust me, you don't wanna hear that. I defer that to the pros.
[2024-4-27. : 7:56 pm]
Ultraviolet -- NudeRaider
NudeRaider shouted: "War nie wirklich weg" 🎵
sing it brother
[2024-4-27. : 6:24 pm]
NudeRaider -- "War nie wirklich weg" 🎵
[2024-4-27. : 3:33 pm]
O)FaRTy1billion[MM] -- o sen is back
[2024-4-27. : 1:53 am]
Ultraviolet -- :lol:
[2024-4-26. : 6:51 pm]
Vrael -- It is, and I could definitely use a company with a commitment to flexibility, quality, and customer satisfaction to provide effective solutions to dampness and humidity in my urban environment.
[2024-4-26. : 6:50 pm]
NudeRaider -- Vrael
Vrael shouted: Idk, I was looking more for a dehumidifer company which maybe stands out as a beacon of relief amidst damp and unpredictable climates of bustling metropolises. Not sure Amazon qualifies
sounds like moisture control is often a pressing concern in your city
[2024-4-26. : 6:50 pm]
Vrael -- Maybe here on the StarEdit Network I could look through the Forums for some Introductions to people who care about the Topics of Dehumidifiers and Carpet Cleaning?
[2024-4-26. : 6:49 pm]
Vrael -- Perhaps even here I on the StarEdit Network I could look for some Introductions.
[2024-4-26. : 6:48 pm]
Vrael -- On this Topic, I could definitely use some Introductions.
Please log in to shout.


Members Online: Zergy, Roy, MetalGear, jun3hong