Staredit Network > Forums > Games > Topic: League of Legends: Tournament Thread
League of Legends: Tournament Thread
Mar 8 2011, 12:05 am
By: Lingie
Pages: < 1 2 3 4 5 >
 

Mar 10 2011, 8:23 pm Jack Post #41

>be faceless void >mfw I have no face

I vote Triple Mode. Also, doubt I'm in, I'll see about my brother though. I assume we can reschedule matches to suit everyone, right?



Red classic.

"In short, their absurdities are so extreme that it is painful even to quote them."

Mar 10 2011, 9:12 pm DevliN Post #42

OVERWATCH STATUS GO

That's an interesting concept, Lingie. I like it.

Hopefully we get 30 people to join.



\:devlin\: Currently Working On: \:devlin\:
My Overwatch addiction.

Mar 10 2011, 9:18 pm Riney Post #43

Thigh high affectionado

Quote from DevliN
That's an interesting concept, Lingie. I like it.

Hopefully we get 30 people to join.

You mean DM right? :hurr:



Riney#6948 on Discord.
Riney on Steam (Steam)
@RineyCat on Twitter

-- Updated as of December 2021 --

Mar 10 2011, 9:25 pm DevliN Post #44

OVERWATCH STATUS GO

Quote from Riney
Quote from DevliN
That's an interesting concept, Lingie. I like it.

Hopefully we get 30 people to join.

You mean DM right? :hurr:
Nope. I'm not saying that it is an interesting idea that he came up with, I'm saying it would be an interesting idea for the tournament and addressing that to Lingie. :)



\:devlin\: Currently Working On: \:devlin\:
My Overwatch addiction.

Mar 10 2011, 10:25 pm poison_us Post #45

Back* from the grave

I say 32 and 8 teams of "4" with one observer to record for each team.




Mar 10 2011, 10:28 pm DevliN Post #46

OVERWATCH STATUS GO

Or 30 and 10 teams of 3. :D

I dunno why but 4 seems odd to me. 2 in mid on the 5v5 map? Woo!



\:devlin\: Currently Working On: \:devlin\:
My Overwatch addiction.

Mar 10 2011, 10:56 pm Jack Post #47

>be faceless void >mfw I have no face

Quote from DevliN
Or 30 and 10 teams of 3. :D

I dunno why but 4 seems odd to me. 2 in mid on the 5v5 map? Woo!
lrn2jungle.



Red classic.

"In short, their absurdities are so extreme that it is painful even to quote them."

Mar 10 2011, 11:12 pm DevliN Post #48

OVERWATCH STATUS GO

wut? I have jungled before and I've been in games where I've had to solo a lane because of a jungler, but typically the jungler will return for ganks, so the game is ultimately still 5v5.

So again, the idea is just odd to me. Could be interesting in terms of MIAs, though.



\:devlin\: Currently Working On: \:devlin\:
My Overwatch addiction.

Mar 11 2011, 12:13 am poison_us Post #49

Back* from the grave

It could be 2 top, 2 mid, 2 bot, or 2 jungle. Wouldn't have to be any particular one, though, players shouldn't be required to have a jungler on their team. What I mean by this is people can either have a 2-man lane or have a jungler, though the 2-man would be at a disadvantage if their opponent isn't jungling.




Mar 11 2011, 12:33 am OlimarandLouie Post #50



Or we could do 5v5s and just use the replay system we talked about earlier.



None.

Mar 11 2011, 12:38 am DevliN Post #51

OVERWATCH STATUS GO

The more I think about it, 4v4 would annoy me but would probably be really fun and nerve-wracking if the other team has a jungler. ^^

I'm also all for the 5v5 with replay concept, and I also have Fraps if need be.



\:devlin\: Currently Working On: \:devlin\:
My Overwatch addiction.

Mar 11 2011, 12:55 am Lingie Post #52



Alright, me and Geminai just had an intellectual conversation about the game modes, and we decided that it would be nifty to combine two of the game modes; Draft, and One Time Mode.

In this sense, you would only be allowed to play a hero once throughout the whole tournament, and then you'd be subjected to bans in Draft Mode. If we played 3 of the random brackets, that means in round 9, there would be 12 heroes you cannot play. This way, players cannot play the same hero through the whole game, and players must adapt with new heroes. Discuss.



Lingie#3148 on Discord. Lingie, the Fox-Tailed on Steam.

Mar 11 2011, 1:39 am OlimarandLouie Post #53



People might run out of available heroes to play?



None.

Mar 11 2011, 2:38 am Lingie Post #54



If people wanted to play Draft mode they'd need 14. Thats not an issue at all.



Lingie#3148 on Discord. Lingie, the Fox-Tailed on Steam.

Mar 11 2011, 3:56 am DevliN Post #55

OVERWATCH STATUS GO

I'm not even that good with that many champs. I'd be better off random-smashing BRAVERY style, I bet. :)

What about a combo of Draft and Triple (Triple, as in each player chooses 3 champs at the beginning and can only choose from those 3)?



\:devlin\: Currently Working On: \:devlin\:
My Overwatch addiction.

Mar 11 2011, 3:59 am Raitaki Post #56



Quote from DevliN
I'm not even that good with that many champs. I'd be better off random-smashing BRAVERY style, I bet. :)

What about a combo of Draft and Triple (Triple, as in each player chooses 3 champs at the beginning and can only choose from those 3)?
The use-each-champ-once rule is better, cuz it'll save us from people who plays their champs REALLY well (like RIney's Gangplank or Olimar's Kassadin)



None.

Mar 11 2011, 3:59 am OlimarandLouie Post #57



How about you are not allowed to play one champion more than twice?



None.

Mar 11 2011, 4:02 am Raitaki Post #58



Quote from OlimarandLouie
How about you are not allowed to play one champion more than twice?
I was saying this exactly :massimo:



None.

Mar 11 2011, 4:14 am DevliN Post #59

OVERWATCH STATUS GO

What? When did you say that?

I do like the more than twice idea, because that lowers the amount of champs that I own that I suck at significantly.

I still prefer Triple, though. ^^



\:devlin\: Currently Working On: \:devlin\:
My Overwatch addiction.

Mar 11 2011, 4:18 am Raitaki Post #60



Quote from DevliN
What? When did you say that?

I do like the more than twice idea, because that lowers the amount of champs that I own that I suck at significantly.

I still prefer Triple, though. ^^
The problem is 1) Many others don't suck with new champs as much as you do, and 2) Many others own with their usual champs more than you do. Conclusion: one-use-each rule ^^



None.

Options
Pages: < 1 2 3 4 5 >
  Back to forum
Please log in to reply to this topic or to report it.
Members in this topic: None.
[08:36 am]
Brusilov -- Hey, what happened to EUDDB? Is there a mirror for it somewhere? Need to do a little research.
[11:31 pm]
Vrael -- :wob:
[08:42 pm]
Ultraviolet -- :wob:
[2024-5-08. : 10:09 pm]
Ultraviolet -- let's fucking go on a madmen rage bruh
[2024-5-08. : 10:01 pm]
Vrael -- Alright fucks its time for cake and violence
[2024-5-07. : 7:47 pm]
Ultraviolet -- Yeah, I suppose there's something to that
[2024-5-06. : 5:02 am]
Oh_Man -- whereas just "press X to get 50 health back" is pretty mindless
[2024-5-06. : 5:02 am]
Oh_Man -- because it adds anotherr level of player decision-making where u dont wanna walk too far away from the medic or u lose healing value
[2024-5-06. : 5:01 am]
Oh_Man -- initially I thought it was weird why is he still using the basic pre-EUD medic healing system, but it's actually genius
[2024-5-06. : 3:04 am]
Ultraviolet -- Vrael
Vrael shouted: I almost had a heart attack just thinking about calculating all the offsets it would take to do that kind of stuff
With the modern EUD editors, I don't think they're calculating nearly as many offsets as you might imagine. Still some fancy ass work that I'm sure took a ton of effort
Please log in to shout.


Members Online: DiearAnother