|
Members in Shoutbox
None.
Shoutbox Search
Shoutbox Commands
/w [name] > Whisper
/r > Reply to last whisper /me > Marks as action Shoutbox Information
Moderators may delete any and all shouts at will.
|
Global Shoutbox
Please log in to shout.
[2015-3-11. : 1:23 am]  Sand Wraith -- * my previous shout was wrt this. And no, this is an extremely dangerous position to hold that you present, although I suppose it is consistent with the sort things you've said.[2015-3-11. : 1:23 am]  Azrael -- You misunderstood him, SW. He was trying to make a passive-aggressive comment about me in third-person, and was referencing the fact I "flamed you" earlier.[2015-3-11. : 1:23 am] Fire_Kame -- RoyRoy shouted: Prove... my lack of attentiveness? you're not helping your case[2015-3-11. : 1:22 am]  Moose -- RoyRoy shouted: I take full responsibility for my lack of attentiveness in regards to flaming in the Shoutbox earlier, and I apologize. Prove it.[2015-3-11. : 1:21 am] Sand Wraith -- jjf28jjf28 shouted: well roy thought you were old enough to tell az to calm his tits on your own I was hoping he'd see how badly he was behaving by my refutations. zsnakezzzsnakezz shouted: so this is a common thing sand? No. I never cried about how being "attractive is a privilege." If you're referring to my reply to Cap'n Will's post, it was a thinly veiled compliment. If you're referring to my previous thoughts in the shoutbox, I figured they would read as largely interested in describing it.[2015-3-11. : 1:21 am] jjf28 -- Fire_KameFire_Kame shouted: Sand Wraith The only way to win is not to play no pain no gain[2015-3-11. : 1:21 am] Fire_Kame -- RoyRoy shouted: SEN is California, then: no lockpicks allowed. You've never owned a Civic I take it[2015-3-11. : 1:20 am] Fire_Kame -- Sand WraithSand Wraith shouted: Roy Where was this when Azrael flamed me? The only way to win is not to play[2015-3-11. : 1:20 am] Roy -- I take full responsibility for my lack of attentiveness in regards to flaming in the Shoutbox earlier, and I apologize.[2015-3-11. : 1:18 am] Roy -- Sand WraithSand Wraith shouted: Roy Where was this when Azrael flamed me? MIA.[2015-3-11. : 1:18 am] jjf28 -- well roy thought you were old enough to tell az to calm his tits on your own[2015-3-11. : 1:17 am] Sand Wraith -- RoyRoy shouted: No flaming, kay thanks. Where was this when Azrael flamed me?[2015-3-11. : 1:17 am] DT_Battlekruser -- lockpicks are legal in California; the state must prove intent to commit burglary in order to convict you for having them[2015-3-11. : 1:17 am] Sand Wraith -- AzraelAzrael shouted: Thanks for that totally reasonable comparison. Just like with gay rights to marriage certificates and Catholics, right? (You know, ignoring the categorical implication that all Catholics care to stamp over gay rights.)[2015-3-11. : 1:17 am] Azrael -- I could literally not care less if you think maps are valuable or not. I doubt anyone does.[2015-3-11. : 1:16 am] Azrael -- If you don't want people talking to you, maybe you should shut the fuck up? Especially about a topic that obviously doesn't concern you one way or the other. The fact that you don't personally have a vested interest in SC maps doesn't reduce their value to those that do.[2015-3-11. : 1:15 am] DT_Battlekruser -- lockpicks can be used for many things - if you lock your keys in your car; for fun; etc. they don't have to be used for illegitimate purposes[2015-3-11. : 1:14 am] Azrael -- zsnakezzzsnakezz shouted: these are starcraft maps, not vaults full of money Whoa, no way![2015-3-11. : 1:14 am] jjf28 -- be fair Az, you love weaving legit and absurd trolling points together  [2015-3-11. : 1:13 am] DT_Battlekruser -- An analogy in the real world might be whether it should be legal to purchase or carry lockpicks. The law on the books in most jurisdictions is that posession of "burglary tools" with the intent to use them in a "burglary" (itself a crime which requires the intent to steal something or commit another felony) is illegal[2015-3-11. : 1:13 am] Sand Wraith -- Azrael has been making absurd arguments from the start since I've wanted to simply talk about it.[2015-3-11. : 1:12 am] Roy -- That's the same argument for people against getting their children vaccinated, interestingly enough.[2015-3-11. : 1:11 am] DT_Battlekruser -- zsnakezzzsnakezz shouted: i mean, lets say we were taking a legal standpoint I mean there are obviously two angles - what use of unprotectors is moral, and how do adopt an official policy that best promotes that?[2015-3-11. : 1:11 am] Sand Wraith -- I don't even mind protecting maps either. I've done it before. I just can't believe that a good majority agree that hosting an unprotector in some way (implementation aside), is a pretty decent idea, and yet here is Azrael, spewing abuse and vitriol at me, claiming I'm selfish, while also ignoring what I've said both in the past and now.[2015-3-11. : 1:11 am] zsnakezz -- they should be allowed, for old content, but there is no way of enforcing that[2015-3-11. : 1:09 am] Roy -- zsnakezzzsnakezz shouted: i mean, lets say we were taking a legal standpoint The legal standpoint is that SEN makes the rules for what it hosts.[2015-3-11. : 1:09 am] jjf28 -- DT_BattlekruserDT_Battlekruser shouted: good lord, I don't want to read a 9-page thread. I forget this debate.. was there ever a faction that believed authors shouldn't have the right to restrict the creation of derivative works? zsnakezzzsnakezz shouted: no, map makers have no right towards locking their work mm, there's almost no one that argues the opposite, the discussion is rather on allowing/disallowing unprotectors on SEN[2015-3-11. : 1:08 am] Sand Wraith -- **ARGUABLY. Sand WraithSand Wraith shouted: DT_Battlekruser Payne. [2015-3-11. : 1:08 am] Sand Wraith -- DT_BattlekruserDT_Battlekruser shouted: good lord, I don't want to read a 9-page thread. I forget this debate.. was there ever a faction that believed authors shouldn't have the right to restrict the creation of derivative works? Payne.[2015-3-11. : 1:07 am] DT_Battlekruser -- good lord, I don't want to read a 9-page thread. I forget this debate.. was there ever a faction that believed authors shouldn't have the right to restrict the creation of derivative works?[2015-3-11. : 1:03 am] Roy -- "Hosting unprotectors for a 20 year old game seems silly." Oh no, the arguments! |
so courteous
Members Online: O)FaRTy1billion[MM]
O)FaRTy1billion[MM]