Death Counters
Jun 22 2008, 12:22 am
By: Brontobyte  

Jun 22 2008, 12:22 am Brontobyte Post #1



For one of my newer maps, which is a remake of an older map to which is a secret, I want to implicate three different levels of difficulty. Easy - 30 lives/slowest spawn speed, Medium - 20 lives/normal spawn rate, and Hard - 10 lives/fastest spawn rate. I planed on using death counters and setting different add speeds for each level. Easy - +1, Medium +3, and Hard +5. I wanted to just use one set of creation triggers that will be set to exactly 15. Now this will mean each will have to run at different amounts of time for it to equal 15. Easy - 15 times, Medium - 5 times, and Hard - 3 times.

Now that you understand this, I wanted to know if that will be too fast for the Hard level. I wanted to just use one trigger with a set amount, but now I think I will have to have different sets of time for each of them. What do you think?



None.

Jun 22 2008, 12:26 am Impeached Post #2



Perhaps you should multiply all DC amounts by ten. Then, for hard, you could make it 25 or 35 instead of just 3.



None.

Jun 22 2008, 12:33 am Brontobyte Post #3



Quote from Impeached
Perhaps you should multiply all DC amounts by ten. Then, for hard, you could make it 25 or 35 instead of just 3.
What would I then have the Creation triggers for? I want to only have one trigger that creates the units for each of the levels an a set exact amount for the death counter. If I have it for any amount It will go too fast for Hard or too slow for Easy.

My Method:
Easy - +1 @15 = 15x
Medium - +3 @15 = 5x
Hard - +5 @15 = 3x

Which one do you want me to multiply by ten? The addition triggers or the exact value for each of the levels.



None.

Jun 22 2008, 1:35 am Impeached Post #4



All the DCs can be multiplied by ten or even one hundred, the conditions, everything. This will give you more room for error. You can have 1.5 instead of 1, or even 1.75 if you multiply it all by 100.

So if you think 3 DC is too fast, you can make it 3.5 (35). I'm not giving you advice on balance, but telling you a way you could fine-tune it more.



None.

Jun 22 2008, 2:36 am Brontobyte Post #5



Quote from Impeached
All the DCs can be multiplied by ten or even one hundred, the conditions, everything. This will give you more room for error. You can have 1.5 instead of 1, or even 1.75 if you multiply it all by 100.

So if you think 3 DC is too fast, you can make it 3.5 (35). I'm not giving you advice on balance, but telling you a way you could fine-tune it more.

I know what you mean now. Instead of having it in the "tens" place make everything to the "hundredths" place, sort of like a decimal. :D I get it in some way but can you explain how I would set up the addition triggers and the conditions for the creation trigger?



None.

Jun 22 2008, 3:32 am Impeached Post #6



Condition: Easy Picked
Effect: Subtract [10] of [DELAY]
Preserve

Condition: Moderate Picked
Effect: Subtract [20] of [DELAY]
Preserve

Condition: Hard Picked
Effect: Subtract [30] of [DELAY]
Preserve

Spawn Trigger
Condition: 0 Deaths of [DELAY]
Effect: [Spawn]
Effect: Set [DELAY] to [GENERIC AMOUNT (say 300)]



None.

Jun 22 2008, 3:41 am Brontobyte Post #7



Ok, thanks now I understand it. :D I actually think that this would be a good idea. I am afraid though that the extremes, Easy and Hard, will either happen too slow or too fast...



None.

Jun 22 2008, 3:52 am Impeached Post #8



That's what testing is for. ;)

And multiplying by 100 or 1000, for extreme fine-tuning.



None.

Jun 22 2008, 4:17 am Brontobyte Post #9



Quote from Impeached
That's what testing is for. ;)

And multiplying by 100 or 1000, for extreme fine-tuning.

I will try the 100 first, then if worst comes to worst, I might have to change the ratio between each of the different difficulties.

EX: Instead of it being Easy = 1, Medium = 3, Hard = 5, I might just change it to: Easy = 2, Medium = 4, Hard = 6.

I also like the idea of instead of adding to get a value, subtracting, I will have to use the at least or at most for these. I will try different methods and different combinations to see what works the best for my given situation. :D



None.

Options
  Back to forum
Please log in to reply to this topic or to report it.
Members in this topic: None.
[06:51 pm]
Vrael -- It is, and I could definitely use a company with a commitment to flexibility, quality, and customer satisfaction to provide effective solutions to dampness and humidity in my urban environment.
[06:50 pm]
NudeRaider -- Vrael
Vrael shouted: Idk, I was looking more for a dehumidifer company which maybe stands out as a beacon of relief amidst damp and unpredictable climates of bustling metropolises. Not sure Amazon qualifies
sounds like moisture control is often a pressing concern in your city
[06:50 pm]
Vrael -- Maybe here on the StarEdit Network I could look through the Forums for some Introductions to people who care about the Topics of Dehumidifiers and Carpet Cleaning?
[06:49 pm]
Vrael -- Perhaps even here I on the StarEdit Network I could look for some Introductions.
[06:48 pm]
Vrael -- On this Topic, I could definitely use some Introductions.
[06:48 pm]
Vrael -- Perhaps that utilizes cutting-edge technology and eco-friendly cleaning products?
[06:47 pm]
Vrael -- Do you know anyone with a deep understanding of the unique characteristics of your carpets, ensuring they receive the specialized care they deserve?
[06:45 pm]
NudeRaider -- Vrael
Vrael shouted: I've also recently becoming interested in Carpet Cleaning, but I'd like to find someone with a reputation for unparalleled quality and attention to detail.
beats me, but I'd make sure to pick the epitome of excellence and nothing less.
[06:41 pm]
Vrael -- It seems like I may need Introductions to multiple companies for the Topics that I care deeply about, even as early as Today, 6:03 am.
[06:38 pm]
Vrael -- I need a go-to solution and someone who understands that Carpets are more than just decorative elements in my home.
Please log in to shout.


Members Online: Vrael, Roy, NudeRaider