(ok think we're pushing the quote limit now)
Yes, bears occasionally wander into urban areas, are video taped on a regularly basis and witnessed by numerous people. We have corpses and pretty dang hard evidence of bears. I don't see the connection to "Bigfoot."
Wait a minute, this argument is starting to go in a loop; let's recap.
If "Bigfoot" exists, where are all the corpses?
"Maybe they bury their dead?"
Then where are all the graves?
"Maybe they only live in uncivilized areas."
Then why are there countless sightings?
Frankly, I don't see the relevance of your bear comparison. I ask you now, what is your theory of the existence of "Bigfoot?"
I will assume that this is what you think (please correct me, I'll probably get something wrong):
Bigfoot is an endangered species, they bury their dead in obscure places and have never been a widespread species.
I ask then (as previously noted), why are there so many sightings? It follows from the fact of the sightings and your assumption that "Bigfoot" is real that either Bigfeets enjoy popping out and exposing them to individual humans only to return to their desolate places of isolation to bury their dead in secret well disguised graves, or that those sightings, pictures and videos are all fake.
This is still plausible, Bigfoot exists but all the sightings are fake and they bury their dead in obscure locations. However, under this theory, the existence of Bigfoot is about as plausible as the existence of the technologically advanced underground mole people (which most people will agree probably don't exist).
This post is a bit long, sorry, but please reply to the entirety of it.
None.