That's odd...yesterday, I was able to play without crashing right after restarting Starcraft. Perhaps the crash is only on Windows?
Yes, then I guess it's
only Windows crash only on top of everything...
New version: ALPHA8Changes list:
- Broodling changed to Scourge.
- Lings spawn probability increased from 1/64 to 5/256.
- Attempted to fix "Extractor Unplaceable" error when making Machine Shops. Made it better, but haven't fully fixed the issue.
- Terran Marine
- Attack increased from 6 to 18.
- Armor increased from 0 to 14.
- Hitpoints decreased from 60 to 45.
- Zerg Scourge (in comparance to the former Zerg Broodling)
- Armor increased from 4 to 17.
- Hitpoints decreased from 35 to 15.
- Zerg Hydralisk
- Attack increased from 15 to 25.
- Terran Machine Shop
- Armor decreased from 2 to 0.
- Build time decreased from 12000 to 9000.
- Mineral cost decreased from 650 to 600.
- Gas cost increased from 300 to 450.
- Zerg Creep Colony
- Armor increased from 3 to 15.
- Initial HP increased from 12% to 20%.
- Zerg Sunken Colony
- Armor increased from 4 to 16.
- Mineral cost decreased from 23 to 20.
- Gas cost decreased from 17 to 15.
As always, download is available at the head post.
Post has been edited 4 time(s), last time on May 25 2011, 5:27 am by Wormer.
Some.
I have to play this some more
I do have some suggestions.
None.
I have to play this some more
I do have some suggestions.
Suggestions are great! When are you online?
EDIT:New version: ALPHA9.Changes list:
- Terran Marine
- Hitpoints increased from 45 to 53
- Zerg Scourge
- Hitpoints decreased from 15 to 13
- Terran Machine Shop
- Mineral cost decreased from 600 to 400
- Gas cost decreased from 450 to 300
- Psi Disrupter
- Armor increased from 3 to 5
- Bulid time decreased from 30000 to 20000
Some.
an idea for forcing the thing to act...
You could implement an overly sensative scanner... The scanner scans occasionaly (say, a set # of times per game), and always picks up the-thing, as well most of the other players; the player(s) not scanned is/are essentially made a target(s). If the thing does not get them he'll have a harder game ahead of him...
Also makes the not-scanned player paranoid, adding dimension to the game
looks great
i'll have to try it
TheNitesWhoSay - Clan Aura -
githubReached the top of StarCraft theory crafting 2:12 AM CST, August 2nd, 2014.
an idea for forcing the thing to act...
You could implement an overly sensative scanner... The scanner scans occasionaly (say, a set # of times per game), and always picks up the-thing, as well most of the other players; the player(s) not scanned is/are essentially made a target(s). If the thing does not get them he'll have a harder game ahead of him...
Also makes the not-scanned player paranoid, adding dimension to the game
looks great
i'll have to try it
Wait-wait can you please explain how it works better? I don't get it.
Some.
So every x minuets the scanner goes off
the scanner identifies (pings? temporarily reveals?) the-thing and a bunch of other players, but one or two of the true anti-viral guys are not identified
So now everyone knows the person not scanned, is not the thing
TheNitesWhoSay - Clan Aura -
githubReached the top of StarCraft theory crafting 2:12 AM CST, August 2nd, 2014.
So every x minuets the scanner goes off
the scanner identifies (pings? temporarily reveals?) the-thing and a bunch of other players, but one or two of the true anti-viral guys are not identified
So now everyone knows the person not scanned, is not the thing
Okay, so you want to reveal who is NOT the thing every x minutes, right? I was thinking of this as an option... As well as revealing different players for different people. For example in a game of 4 players (Red, Blue, Teal and Purple) Red is told Teal is NOT the thing, Blue is told Red is NOT the thing, and teal is told Blue is NOT the thing. It may work... However I didn't like something about this, can't tell what for sure now, but something was wrong when I thought about it. I think it seemed for me too easy to discover who is the thing after this. But taking the overall level of an average player I may reconsider this idea. It's still something a bit more complex than a simple timer but not too complex as the other ideas.
Some.
FoxWolf1
